Misplaced Pages

Herbert Dingle

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 213.107.15.23 (talk) at 20:42, 6 August 2007 (Undid revision 149615697 by 213.107.15.23 (talk)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 20:42, 6 August 2007 by 213.107.15.23 (talk) (Undid revision 149615697 by 213.107.15.23 (talk))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Herbert Dingle (18901978) was an English astronomer and president of the Royal Astronomical Society. He is best-known for his claim to have found an inconsistency in the theory of special relativity.

Born in 1890, Dingle was educated at Plymouth Science, Art and Technical Schools and Imperial College, London. He was a member of the British government eclipse expeditions of 1927 and 1932; and became Professor of Natural Philosophy, Imperial College in 1938, Professor of History and Philosophy of Science, University College London in 1946–1955 and President of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1951–1953. Appointed Professor Emeritus of History and Philosophy of Science in 1955, he died in 1978.

Originally a supporter of Einstein's work on the theory of relativity and an author of the textbook Relativity for All (1922), Dingle came to doubt its foundations after reading an account of the so-called twin paradox. According to this, a clock that moves relative to another will appear to run more slowly as judged by the stationary clock and inversely. Dingle claimed that Einstein's results were inconsistent with those worked out using a "commonsense" method. However, other experts — notably the astrophysicist Sir William H. McCrea — disagreed. The arguments between Dingle and McCrea in Nature are well-known

One article about Dingle's disagreements points out that his arguments were largely misunderstood and a recent biographical sketch of McCrea has labeled these friendly but heated exchanges as "part of the legend of the early days of relativity". Dingle's claim about special relativity was never accepted by the mainstream physics community, for which it is no longer an active area of debate.

References

  1. Dingle, H. (October 14 1967). "The Case against Special Relativity". Nature: 119. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  2. McCrea, W.H. (October 14 1967). "Why The Special Theory of Relativity is Correct". Nature: 122. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  3. Chang, H. "A Misunderstood Rebellion: The Twin-Paradox Controversy and Herbert Dingle's Vision Of Science", Studies In History and Philosophy of Science, Vol 24 (1993), pp 741-790
  4. Williams, Iwan (2003). McCartney, Mark and Whitaker, Andrew (ed.). Physicists of Ireland: Passion and Precision. IOP Publishing Ltd. pp. p. 252. ISBN 0750308664. {{cite book}}: |pages= has extra text (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)
  5. Will, Clifford M. (2006). "Special Relativity: A Centenary Perspective". In T. Damour, O. Darrigol, B. Duplantier and V. Rivasseau (ed.). Einstein, 1905-2005: Poincaré Seminar 2005. Birkhäuser Basel. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapter= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)
  • A Misunderstood Rebellion: The Twin-Paradox Controversy and Herbert Dingle's Vision Of Science by H. Chang, Studies In History and Philosophy of Science, Vol 24 (1993), pp 741-790.

External links

Stub icon

This article about a physicist of the United Kingdom is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Template:Euro-astronomer-stub

Stub icon

This article about a British scientist is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: