This is an old revision of this page, as edited by John Smith's (talk | contribs) at 08:57, 8 August 2007 (Undid revision 149888386 by 74.242.188.34 (talk)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 08:57, 8 August 2007 by John Smith's (talk | contribs) (Undid revision 149888386 by 74.242.188.34 (talk))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives |
Inuse
Yes, Des Browne to make an announcement. I didn't realise there was another debate in between - I thought it would be 10 mins at the most. The template isn't binding, if you want to make changes feel free. Mark83 12:11, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Arbitration
It depends what Giovanni's said. Assuming you're still willing to participate in mediation: If Giovanni will too, then try that. If not, then maybe another request for arbitration is in order. --Deskana (talk) 16:28, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
3RR
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Category:Nanking Massacre. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors.
Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 18:38, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Warning
If you and HongQiGong edit war on one more page, I'm blocking you both. I'm not protecting three pages because of the same dispute. Two is stupid already. --Deskana (talk) 18:40, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Your RfC
John, FYI, I've left a comment. Regards, --Folic Acid 18:59, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Request for Mediation
|
A Request for Mediation to which you are a party has been accepted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Mao: The Unknown Story 2.
|
- Hello John Smith's, I am writing to you because, as a party to this case, your input is required before mediation can begin, to do with an offer by an experienced non-Committee user to mediate. Please see the Parties' agreement to Tariqabjotu's offer section and provide your input, so that this case can progress. Further elaboration is provided at that link. Cheers, Daniel 08:24, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Request for Mediation
|
|
A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Nanking Massacre 2.
|
Re: your 3RR warning on User talk:HongQiGong
When using certain template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Nat Tang 01:06, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Re: Japan Self-Defense Forces
Thanks for catching that. Lothar of the Hill People 19:49, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
BCE/CE
Hi John, until a new decision is reached on BCE/CE, the rule it to maintain coherence within an article. The current rule has to be respected, not an hypothetical future one. Regards. PHG
- Hence the revert. Trying to impose BC/AD in that article goes against current Misplaced Pages rules and therefore consists in date-warring, however good your intentions may be. Regards PHG
Template:History by time period
I assume the above would apply to the Template:History by time period. Hyacinth 22:08, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
If every article that the template is used on and will plausibly be used on uses BC and AD then the template could be changed, though I would prefer that the articles be changed. Does Misplaced Pages or a WikiProject have a policy or guideline on this issue? Hyacinth 22:26, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Ok, done. Happy? Told you so. Btw, you were right, it only took 2 mins (but I just copied your format).Giovanni33 05:13, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Edit Summaries
Please use them. El_C 12:59, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thanks
No prob. Personally, I prefer BCE/CE but whatever is chosen its better not to be schizophrenic - nice edit and thanks for leaving a note. --sony-youth 08:02, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
3RR
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Han Dynasty. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors.
Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 19:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Aikido
Hi I just resubmitted the Aikido article for Featured article status. Appreciate it, based on your previous help, if you could take a look.Peter Rehse 08:23, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Japan taskforces
In order to encourage more participation, and to help people find a specific area in which they are more able to help out, we have organized taskforces at WikiProject Japan. Please visit the Participants page and update the list with the taskforces in which you wish to participate. Links to all the taskforces are found at the top of the list of participants.
Please let me know if you have any questions, and thank you for helping out! ···日本穣 08:52, 7 August 2007 (UTC)