This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DannyMuse (talk | contribs) at 08:35, 15 June 2005. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 08:35, 15 June 2005 by DannyMuse (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome!
Hi Duffer1! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Alai 05:28, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Timestamp in Signatures
To answer your question, you can add a timestamp to your signature by typing four tildes at the end of your message. See Misplaced Pages:Sign your posts on talk pages for a detailed description of how the tilde signature system works. -- uberpenguin 15:45, 2005 Jun 8 (UTC)
User Talk Pages
Just so you know, it's generally considered bad form to delete content from your talk page. Some people see that as hiding something. It's your page and you can do what you want with it, but most people archive their talk page instead of deleting it. Cheers, Kevin Rector (talk) 19:50, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
New Message re JW Pages
Hello Matthew McGhee. Interesting, my wife is a McGhee from Los Angeles, California. My name is Daniel O'Brien. We are members of the Moorpark Congregation in Ventura county.
At any rate, I appreciate your edits and your comments in reference to all the JW related pages. Tonight during the Service Meeting it occurred to me that we should add a section to the JW main page dealing with Apostates and the Evil Slave class. I looked in the Reasoning book under "Apostasy." There are some good points there that we could incorporate. My thought is this: by adding this to the Opposition to Jehovah's Witnesses section, but wording it as neutrally as possible, it will serve as a touchstone to expose the agenda of some of the editors that are obviously of that group. The more they try to deny it, the more their words and actions would tend to confirm it. We'll be able to explain more about our beliefs and any detractors will only serve to prove our point!
I'll try to make a draft attempt at this in the morning and perhaps I'll post it. I'll let you know! --DannyMuse 08:32, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)