Misplaced Pages

Talk:West Siberian Laika

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Coaster1983 (talk | contribs) at 02:12, 19 September 2007 (note). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 02:12, 19 September 2007 by Coaster1983 (talk | contribs) (note)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the West Siberian Laika article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
WikiProject iconDogs Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Canidae and commonly referred to as "dogs" and of which the domestic dog is but one of its many members, on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DogsWikipedia:WikiProject DogsTemplate:WikiProject DogsDogs
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Dogs To-do:

Here are some tasks you can do to help with WikiProject Dogs:

Recent Changes

I have noticed that the article has been drastically changed in the last week or so. Overall, I feel that the article's quality regressed from the previous version prior to edits made on September 11. Currently, the article has the following issues:

  • Poor organization. The behavior section has an almost unreadable block of text. This text contains the physical description of breed which should be in its own section
  • The article needs to be Wikilinked.
  • The dog breed infobox has been removed twice. This needs to stay in the article since all dog breed articles have this infobox.
  • Improper formating of images which results in a link instead of the image.
  • Two of the references point to forums, which are not considered reliable sources. They should be removed.
  • There is some subjectivity in the article. This needs to be rewritten in a neutral tone.

That all said, the article has been improved by the addition of references and more information about the breed. --Coaster1983 02:12, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Categories: