This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Causa sui (talk | contribs) at 18:04, 19 September 2007 (copying discussion from previous article talk). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:04, 19 September 2007 by Causa sui (talk | contribs) (copying discussion from previous article talk)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Like I said: No, the bittorrent tracker is one of the most visited sites on the entire internet. The band is practically unknown.
And it's a 2 way disambig, which are usually disambigued with the "This article is about the BitTorrent tracker. For the metal band, see Demonoid (band)" tag. And in this case when there's such a ridiculous margin of notability, demonoid clearly should not be a 2 entry disambiguation page but rather be the actual page for the tracker.
I just made this a REDIRECT to preserve the edit history, I'll let the admins merge and mop up, etc. Demonoid (BitTorrent) should be moved to Demonoid. --froth 02:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
This page is more active than the other page demonoid. Do you think that this should be named Demonoid or should there be a disambiguation? Xeysz ☼ 23:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
unambiguously disambiguousely disambiguous... probably. Cowicide 12:20, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Does this article really need that enormous image of the entire demonoid.com home page? It seems a little ridiculous dystopianray 01:51, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Please
see Talk:Demonoid re naming issues --froth 02:56, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Quality
Perhaps the quality of demonoid's torrents should be noted here. I've heard that their albums are mislabeled, in the best case being all lowercase letters, in the worst, poorly spelled and misdated. Anything? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.100.218.156 (talk) 15:20, 18 September 2007 (UTC)