This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 129.206.124.135 (talk) at 11:14, 29 April 2005. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:14, 29 April 2005 by 129.206.124.135 (talk)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This article contains some links to redirects and unwritten articles. Please do not remove these links, or if you do save the links on this talk page. I use these links to remember what I need to write. Optim 01:16, 18 Jan 2004 (UTC)
so, go ahead. There is a lot to do :-))) Umberto
I see the name Rosenkreutz alternating with Rosencreutz. Which is it? heidimo 02:33, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC)
They're interchangeable- just two differing anglicizations, both found in historical documents.
-FZ 21:27, 10 Jun 2004
Not even different anglicizations but just 17th century spelling variants. (flaig@sanctacaris.net)
Rosy Cross
Is it worth noting that the rose and cross are symbolic of the female and male genitalia? Pmurray bigpond.com 04:53, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Sure it is, but should not be overconsidered either. All successful initiatory societies owe at least part of their appeal to the fact that their symbolism is open to a wide range of explanations -- especially if there are so many different representations as there are of the "rose croix", from a cross within a rose to five roses on a cross. Maybe someone could present a few examples? I have (from Golodowin's "Dictionary of Symbols"), but they are under the publisher's copyright. (flaig@sanctacaris.net)