Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Morton devonshire (talk | contribs) at 18:50, 14 October 2007 (more accurate). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Loose Change is a documentary film written and directed by Dylan Avery, and produced by Korey Rowe with Jason Bermas. It claims that the September 11 attacks were planned and conducted by elements within the United States government, and bases these claims on perceived anomalies in the historical record of the attacks. The film was originally released through the creators' own company, Louder than Words, and received widespread attention after Loose Change 2nd Edition was featured on a Binghamton, New York local FOX affiliate, WICZ-TV (FOX 40).

The material claims contained within the film have been refuted by mainstream media outlets, independent researchers, and prominent members of the scientific and engineering community. Some of the pseudo-scientific theories presented in the film are supported by a minority of academics, mostly from within the Scholars for 9/11 Truth movement.

The original film has also been edited and re-released as "Loose Change 2nd Edition", and then subsequently re-edited again for the "2nd Edition Recut", each time to tighten the focus on certain key areas and to remove inaccuracies and copyrighted material. A further "Final Cut" version was planned for release on "the weekend preceding September 11th 2007" and planned to be screened in key cities in the United States. It was also made available online through pay-per-view.

History

Avery had originally been planning to make a movie about conspiracy theories related to the attacks of 9/11, called Loose Change. Avery stated that he began to believe that there was in fact an actual 9/11 cover-up, and changed the film into a documentary after discussions with his childhood friend Korey Rowe. Rowe, a soldier who served in Afghanistan and Iraq, became the producer of Loose Change while Jason Bermas became the film's researcher.

There have been two editions of the film released thus far. The first edition, made on a laptop computer, cost around $2000 USD to make and was released in April of 2005. This edition of the film featured material on a device (which the filmmakers refer to as a "pod") under the fuselage of Flight 175 that struck the South Tower of the World Trade Center. The "pod" was presented as evidence that the planes involved in the attack were replaced with remote-controlled drones. Official flight records were also presented as evidence that the aircraft involved are still in active service, though it is stated that the producers do not know what happened to the passengers of the flights.

The second edition, released in November of 2005 was made for an estimated $6000 USD. This edition was heavily revised and included a new introduction, as well as extra footage which Avery purchased on eBay. The "pod" segment was also removed. This film also took a different stand on Flight 93 than the first edition, which claimed the flight was intended to be shot down by a military aircraft, and instead claimed that Flight 93 actually landed at Cleveland Hopkins Airport.

In August of 2006 a recut version of Loose Change 2nd Edition was released, which corrected some errors in the original release, as well as removing some allegedly infringing material taken from the Naudet brothers documentary 9/11. This version is available for purchase and distribution through its official website. It can also be viewed for free online and downloaded from Google Video, where it held the first position in the top ranking of available videos until mid 2006.

According to Broadcast magazine, the video was to have a special screening at the UK Houses of Parliament on June 14, 2006. Michael Meacher, the British MP who had considered sponsoring the screening, decided against it. During that same month of June 2006, a former engineer from Microsoft developed a site, www.loose-change-911.com, to stream the movie in seven different languages.

On September 11, 2006 Dylan Avery and Jason Bermas appeared on Democracy Now! the War and Peace Report, to debate with James Meigs and David Dunbar, two of the editors of Popular Mechanics and the book Debunking 9/11 Myths.

After releasing the film, Avery, Rowe and Bermas set up an independent movie production company called Louder than Words. The company is also a member of the 9/11 Truth Movement.

Crew

Dylan Avery

Avery is from Oneonta, New York. After being denied admission twice by Purchase College's film school, Avery planned to make a movie about a group of friends who discover the September 11, 2001 attacks were an "inside job". Along the way Avery himself stated that he had become convinced of this theory.

Avery appeared on BBC's 9/11 Conspiracy Files in February 2007.

Korey Rowe

Korey Rowe is a producer of Loose Change. Rowe was born in Oneonta, New York. He is a former US soldier who served six months in Kandahar, Afghanistan and one year in Kuwait and Iraq. Rowe enlisted in the 101st Airborne Division in August 2001 and left in June 2005, then joining the production of Loose Change. On July 23, 2007, he was arrested in Oneonta, New York, based on a military warrant charging him with felony desertion. Two days later, he was returned to his unit at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, although he states that he received an honorable discharge and returned to uniform of his own accord, and that he is attempting to expunge his name completely from the system. Rowe was at the end of his active-duty enlistment in the summer of 2005 when he was told his unit would be re-deployed to Iraq. He left his unit to avoid serving a second tour of duty in Iraq which was required under the US Army’s controversial Stop-loss policy. Rowe's unit, the 187th Infantry Regiment, is due to return to Iraq in August 2007.

Jason Bermas

Jason Bermas is a graphic designer and producer of Loose Change located in Oneonta, New York. Jason Bermas also hosts his own Talk radio program on the GCN Network. on Tuesday and Wednesday evenings from 8-10 pm Eastern Time. Aside from film making he is also an activist who has demanded a new independent investigation into 9/11.

Presentation

Loose Change is approximately one hour and 22 minutes in length. The film consists of Dylan Avery narrating over photographs and news footage relating to 9/11, with an underscore of hip hop and other urban style music. Avery does not appear in the video, though is shown in the bonus features. Video and still footage used includes considerable video content from CNN, NBC, and FOX News, as well as a number of other sources.

The end of Loose Change 2nd Edition shows a clip from The American Scholar's Symposium that was aired on C-SPAN on June 25, 2006 at the Sheraton Hotel in Los Angeles. Jason Bermas, wearing the signature "Investigate 9/11" t-shirt that he designed is describing their plans to peacefully demonstrate at Ground Zero on September 11, 2006.

Content

The video opens with a brief description of past suspicious and questionable motives in the history of American government. This discussion includes mention of Operation Northwoods, a plan put forward during the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962 to create and utilise bogus terrorist attacks against the United States, which were to be blamed on Cuba, as a pretext for invasion of the country. Focus is particularly directed at the previously proposed plans to substitute real commercial airliners with pilotless drone aircraft in order to investigate the plausibility of covertly using them as weapons, whilst maintaining the cover of an accident.

Attention is also given to the Project for the New American Century, a neo-conservative think-tank, which released a report in 2000 titled "Rebuilding America's Defenses". In particular the film points out a line from that report which states "the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor". It also highlights the fact that during the same year the report was released, the Pentagon conducted the first of two training exercises which simulated a Boeing 757 crashing into the building. There is also mention that, from September 6 to September 10 an unusual amount of put options were placed on the stock of American Airlines, Boeing and United Airlines.

This is followed by an examination of the attacks on the Pentagon. The film opposes the official story of Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon, alleging that the path of destruction does not match that which a 757 would leave. In particular, it points out the size of the hole in the Pentagon caused by the crash, examining a lack of debris and landscape damage seemingly inconsistent with prior airliner crashes. It is also alleged that too few parts were recovered from the crash site to reliably ascertain that they were of a Boeing 757, and a certain flywheel observed at the site seemed too small to have been part of the aircraft's engine turbine. The wheel was officially declared to have been part of the APU but disputed by some experts as not to have come from the APU of a 757 but likely from an E-3 Sentry aircraft. It is also claimed that Hani Hanjour, the hijacker pilot, had difficulty performing basic controls on a small Cessna at a flight school where he rented, and that perhaps not even an experienced pilot could have maneuvered the reflex angle of turn at the airspeed and altitude at which the aircraft approached without going into a high speed stall. Mention is also given to three cameras on nearby buildings that allegedly caught the entire incident at the Pentagon on film, which the government confiscated and has refused to release in full.

The next section focuses on the destruction of the World Trade Center itself. The film comes out in favor of the controlled demolition theory of the destruction of World Trade Centers 1, 2 and 7. Cited as evidence are eyewitness reports from a janitor, firemen, and other people near the buildings who heard bangs, many of them describing them as explosions, as well as videotapes showing windows far below the burning floors blow out during the collapse and seismograph results recorded during the collapse compared to the collapse of other similar buildings. The film claims that WTC 1, 2 and 7 were the first steel frame buildings in history to collapse due to fire. Another allegation centers on an audio recording in which it is claimed two distinct explosions can be heard at the time of the impact. Also, the film posits that the official story of the collapse violates the laws of physics.

In particular, the video alleges that the fires inside the twin towers were not hot enough to bring the buildings down. An audio tape is presented in which the Captain of Ladder 7 claims that the fires can be brought under control by two lines, and it is mentioned that building 7 had taken only minor damage before its own collapse. These allegations follow a listing of buildings that burned with more intense fires than the Twin Towers and did not fall.

For Flight 93, the video ignores the more mainstream theory of the plane being shot down to instead allege it was landed safely at Cleveland Hopkins Airport where it was evacuated by government personnel into an unused NASA research center. Evidence cited included photographs and eyewitness reports of the crash site as evidence, a corresponding evacuation at Cleveland Hopkins Airport due to another hijacked plane and the corresponding reports, oddities in the transcripts of cell-phone calls supposedly placed from the plane during the hijacking, and the sighting of the tail number of Flight 93 on an aircraft in use at a later date.

This is then followed by a more miscellaneous listing of allegations. It is claimed that cellular phone calls could not be made from American Airlines flights at the time of the crash, asking why American Airlines had to install a system in their own airplanes to allow the reception of cellular signals within the planes if they could do this regardless on September 11. It is suggested that the calls from passengers and crew were faked using sophisticated voice-morphing technology developed by the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico and that the December 13, 2001 video of Osama Bin Laden claiming responsibility for the attacks was also faked, which was claimed to be achieved by editing a former video of Osama Bin Laden with a bogus confession tape of what appeared to be an overweight lookalike version of Bin Laden. Finally, it is alleged that, of the list of hijackers initially released by the government, many were not in the planes and were alive after September 11, 2001 and may even still be alive.

In the end, the film gives out motives for people who would have benefited from launching the attacks themselves. Mention is first given to financial motives, including those of Larry Silverstein, who stood to receive a substantial insurance payout after the attacks due to a specific anti-terrorism clause (although not enough to cover his losses), as well as other allegations of insider trading and Halliburton's benefiting from the subsequent launch of America's "War on Terror". Most of the blame, however, is placed on the aforementioned Project for the New American Century think tank and the Rebuilding America's Defenses report.

Legal problems

On May 26, 2006 a certified letter was sent to Dylan Avery regarding copyright and trademark infringement resulting from the use of footage from French film makers, the Naudet brothers. The letter states that Avery used, "copyrighted images from the 9/11 Film," and also states the images violate, "the Federal Lanham Trademark Act by suggesting that the Naudet brothers or Mr. Hanlon have endorsed or sponsored the controversial views in your film." The letter concludes: "Accordingly, we hereby demand that you confirm to us within three (3) business days of the receipt of this letter that you have removed all footage taken from our clients' 9/11 Film from your Loose Change Film, including from the version of your film that can be downloaded on the Internet, the DVD version of your film, and anywhere else you have used or are using our clients' footage." In July of 2006 Dylan Avery announced that the recut version of the film would omit "some" of the infringing material.

Criticism

Three different point-by-point critiques were prepared by 911research.wtc7.net, Internet Detectives and Mark Roberts. Two commentators run a blog called Screw Loose Change. Mark Iradian prepared an edited version of Loose Change under the SLC moniker, subtitled with criticisms drawing on work by Roberts, Screw Loose Change (which also gives credit to the video), and his own efforts. Mark Roberts also compiled a lengthy selection of interview quotes in which the Loose Change creators elaborate on the claims made in the film.

Many of the critiques argue that Loose Change uses unreliable sources, oversimplified arguments and selective facts to claim that there are serious problems with official accounts of the events of September 11.

Loose Change suggests a missile hit the Pentagon, yet only briefly acknowledges the eyewitnesses at the scene who reported seeing a large commercial jet. The lack of readily visible airplane debris and bodies in the Pentagon and Pennsylvania crashes is focused on by Loose Change and it uses other airline disasters as evidence there should be larger debris found. However, according to 911 Review.com, those crashes were accidents where pilots were trying to save their aircraft over terrain; rather than deliberately crashing them into the ground or buildings. A fighter jet crashing into a concrete barrier and other jetliner crashes provide precedents for comparison. Substantial amounts of debris and body parts were recovered from both crash sites as the recovery operations began.

While some of the calls from Flight 93 were made with Airfones, the documentary asserts that other calls made with cell phones could not have happened from cruising altitudes; and that new cell phone systems being tested in airplanes support this point. In the recent book Debunking 9/11 Myths by Popular Mechanics, the editors reply that Flight 93's altitude was lower and it was frequently over rural areas with powerful cell towers. Commercial airlines are testing new cell phone systems as it is a cost effective replacement to the unpopular Airfone being phased out. Reception is also improved (cell calls were dropped on Flight 93), works over the ocean, decreases avionics interference and flight crews can disable the phones.

Loose Change compares the Collapse of the World Trade Center to other notable high rise fires, but the National Institute of Standards and Technology clarifies there are differences in building design and size, structural damage and compromised fireproofing. Popular Mechanics points out in many conspiracy theories there is no exploration on the effect of fire on unprotected structural steel, which "loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F." Kevin Ryan, the "expert" source from Underwriters Laboratories, is actually a non-expert from a subsidiary for water testing, Underwriters Laboratories does not certify structural steel, and ASTM E119 certification involves intact fireproofing as conducted by Underwriters Laboratories for the NIST in 2004. The NIST could find no record of any previous certification tests ever being conducted on the novel WTC floor system. The NIST demonstrated the fireproofing was not intact by firing shotguns on fireproofed steel; conspiracy advocates find this unconvincing.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology, a government agency has released a point-by-point rebuttal of many common alternative theories of the WTC collapse, including theories which Loose Change used. On September 11, 2006, Democracy Now! conducted an exclusive discussion with Loose Change's creators and Popular Mechanics editors, where they debate various aspects of the documentary.

Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone has written that the 9/11 truth movement: "gives supporters of Bush an excuse to dismiss critics of this administration. I have no doubt that every time one of those Loose Change dickwads opens his mouth, a Republican somewhere picks up five votes." Critics also point out the documentary quote mines sources, uses unreliable or out of date sources and cherry-picks interview footage. It quotes Danielle O'Brien commenting on how air traffic controllers thought Flight 77 was a military plane based on its maneuverability; but it leaves out the end of the statement, "... you don't fly a 757 in that manner. It's unsafe." Loose Change quotes the coroner, Wally Miller, as seeing no bodies or blood the day of Flight 93's crash; over the next several weeks Miller goes on to identify 12 passengers "using mostly dental records." There is an interview of chief flight instructor Marcel Bernard focusing on the weaknesses of Hani Hanjour's flying skills when he took lessons at Freeway Airport; it fails to clarify Bernard's expert opinion on Hanjour's ability to hit the Pentagon. "There's no doubt in my mind that once that got going, he could have pointed that plane at a building and hit it."

In addition, many within the 9-11 research community point out the film's focus upon the Pentagon crash as a weakness. Chris Farrell, the Director of Investigations & Research at Judicial Watch, warned in an interview that his organization "could be the water carriers for a honey pot operation, in which the government attracts overwhelming attention to the Pentagon issue, making it the cornerstone of the 9/11 truth movement, and then blowing it out of the water by releasing clear footage of Flight 77." He stated, "Let's just call it a baited trap, it draws somebody into a situation in which they're compromised."

In a debate against Mark Roberts, creator of the "Loose Change 2nd Edition Viewers Guide" and Ronald Wieck, contributor to the American Thinker, on Hardfire, a local NYC cable program, Dylan Avery stated that:

I would be the first to admit that our film definitely contained errors, it still does contain some dubious claims, and it does come to some conclusions that are not 100% backed up by the facts.

Corrections

The original release of Loose Change Second Edition had factual inaccuracies; some of these have been corrected (or removed) in the recut Second Edition. The most notable are:

• New York's Empire State Building was not hit by a B-52 in 1945, but rather a B-25 Mitchell which is less than one-third the size of a B-52. (the first prototype B-52 would not fly for another seven years)
• The suggestion that $167 billion in gold was stored in vaults beneath the World Trade Center was removed as it exceeded the entire amount of U.S. gold reserves by approximately $67 billion. The "$230 million in precious metals" stored at the WTC complex were in fact recovered.
• Loose Change implies 757's only have Pratt & Whitney engines made of steel and titanium alloy, when in fact the engines used in Flight 77 are Rolls-Royce engines. Bollyn, an American Free Press reporter whom Loose Change references got the incorrect information from a factory in Indiana which makes engines for smaller aircraft; rather than the companies in Quebec and Derby that overhaul the 757 engines.
• He refers to a 757 as a Jumbo Jet, yet it is a medium haul commercial airliner.

Airings

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2007) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

BNN (Bart News Network) Nederland 3 and Portuguese public TV Station RTP aired Loose Change on September 10th, 2006 in prime time hours. RTP aired it again on 2: for September 17 2006. On September 11th 2006, Australian Pay TV Channel, The History Channel, showed it during prime time hours; it also aired on Israeli Science Channel (Channel 8) and the Pakistani channel Geo TV — dubbed into Urdu. Al-Arabiya TV, an affiliate of MCB, aired it on September 11, 2006- dubbed into Arabic.

In other media

• George Monbiot, political activist and columnist for the Guardian, wrote an article on the improbability of the conspiracies cited in Loose Change, and then wrote a follow-up article in response to negative comments from some of his readers.
• Vanity Fair wrote an article about Loose Change and its creators.
• Democracy Now! hosted a debate between the authors of Loose Change and the editors of Popular Mechanics.
• Dutch Vara television channel's program Zembla, investigated claims made in the documentary.
• FreeLooseChange.com is an initiative in Berlin, Germany. 100 shops, galleries, theatres and a daily newspaper office so far distributed 20,000 free DVDs featuring the documentaries Loose Change and Terrorstorm by Alex Jones in German language versions. A homeless newspaper and a skater magazine promoted the DVD with free full page ads.
• The History Channel aired a two hour episode on August 20th 2007 entitled "The 9/11 Conspiracies: Fact or Fiction?" featuring interviews with the creators of Loose Change.

Parody

Several individuals have lampooned Loose Change with parody movies such web satirist Maddox (as an April Fool's Joke) attempting to prove a conspiracy involving RMS Titanic in Unfastened Coins. They launched the newly formed "R.M.S. Titanic Truth Movement," which alleges that the R.M.S. Olympic was actually sunk in the Titanic's place as an insurance fraud. Another such parody is Jared M. Gordon's Moose Change, alleging that the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated by alien moose.

See also

• 9/11: Press for Truth
• Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center

References

1. NY FOX affiliate airs alternative 9/11 theory, "Loose Change"
2. Guardian.co.uk: A 9/11 conspiracy virus is sweeping the world, but it has no basis in fact by George Monbiot
3. Salon.com: Ask the pilot by Patrick Smith
4. LooseChangeGuide.com
5. internetdetectives.biz
6. DemocracyNow.org – Loose Change Filmmakers vs. Popular Mechanics Editors of "Debunking 9/11 Myths"
7. Scholars for 911 Truth website homepage
8. Scholars for 911 Truth and Justice website homepage
9. Loose Change Blog
10. Google Video - Loose Change Extra Footage
11. "Click Here for Conspiracy", Vanity Fair article, by Nancy Jo Sales, August 2006
12. "Loose Change 2nd Edition". Retrieved 2006-05-17.
13. "Loose Change 2nd Edition". Google Video. Retrieved 2006-05-17.
14. "Broadcast website's article excerpt from search for loose change". Retrieved 2006-05-30.
15. "UKFilm.org". Retrieved 2006-05-30.
16. loosechange911.blogspot.com Producer's website blog
17. archive.org
18. ^ DemocracyNow.org – 9/11 Debate: Loose Change Filmmakers vs. Popular Mechanics Editors of "Debunking 9/11 Myths"
19. Web movie takes flight
20. "Interview in The John Ziegler Show (KFI AM 640, Los Angeles, CA)". Segment begins at approximately 18:10. 2006-06-23. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
21. "Movie Minutiae: Loose Change (2005)". ABC News. 2006-09-15. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
22. Movie creator charged.
23. Kentucky Based Soldier Arrested
24. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,290942,00.html
25. http://www.thedailystar.com/news/stories/2007/07/27/jprowe0727.html
26. http://www.thedailystar.com/news/stories/2007/07/31/jprowe07306.html
27. LooseChange911.com
28. LooseChangeGuide.com
29. "9/11 conspiracy movie taken off the web - Copyright infringement alleged". The Independent. Retrieved 2006-06-09.
30. Loose Change Blog - First quarter. Houston by five.
31. Loose Change Creators Speak (PDF file)
32. Pentagon Eyewitness Analysis
33. 911review.com – ERROR: 'Aircraft Crashes Always Leave Large Debris'
34. 911research.wtc7.net – Jetliner Crash Debris
35. 911myths.com – 757 Wreckage
36. The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press – Moussaoui trial exhibits and documents
37. Cite error: The named reference Curiel was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
38. PCWorld.com – In-Flight Cell Phone Systems Gain Altitude
39. ConsumerAffairs.com – In-Flight Cell Phone System Survives Test Flight
40. ^ wtc.nist.gov – Point by point rebuttal
41. Popular Mechanics – 9/11: Debunking The Myths
42. ^ ScienceDaily.com – NIST Tests Provide Fire Resistance Data On World Trade Center Floor Systems
43. 911research.wtc7.net – Insulation Failures
44. Taibbi, Matt (2006). "The Low Post: I, Left Gatekeeper". Politics. Rolling Stone. Retrieved 2006-09-29.
45. 911review.com – Location of Pentagon Strike
46. PostGazette.com – Latest Somerset crash site findings may yield added IDs
47. Tracing Trail Of Hijackers
48. Judicial Watch Says More Pentagon Tapes To Come
49. http://www.debunk911myths.org/?cat=40
50. Hardfire, program aired December 26, 2006 and can be viewed online:
51. Google Video – Loose Change 2nd Edition Recut
52. Rediff.com – Buried WTC gold returns to futures trade
53. 9-11 Loose Change Second Edition Viewer Guide
54. monbiot.com
55. http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=13037
56. tvguide.com

External links

• LooseChange911.com – Official website
• LooseChangeForums.com – Official Forums
• Loose Change 2nd Edition Online Version (Google Video)
• Beyond The Ordinary – Interviews with Loose Change director and producer
• View Loose Change online in many different languages

Criticism

• Subtitled critical version of Loose Change
• 9-11 Loose Change Second Edition Viewer Guide – Point-by-point criticism
• The 9-11Research Companion to "Loose Change 2nd Edition – An interactive and detailed point-by-point critique of the film using an illustrated transcript
• "Loose Change" An analysis - By Michael B. Green, Ph. D
• Debunking Loose Change - By Internet Detectives

Media Coverage

• Democracy Now! Exclusive 9/11 Debate: Loose Change Filmmakers vs. Popular Mechanics Editors of "Debunking 9/11 Myths" Broadcast on September 11 2006
• 9/11 conspiracy movie taken off the web - June 5 2006 - Naudet brothers allege infringement
• BBC story about Loose Change and the released Pentagon video
• CBC Interview with Dylan Avery "The Hour: 9/11 Conspiracy Theory" May 17 2006
• Loose Change Review: "Goofball Shockumentary"
• Popular Mechanics on 9/11: Debunking The Myths
• Scientific American: Fahrenheit 2777
• Salon Article "Ask the Pilot" – A pilot takes on the 9/11 conspiracy theorists
• A 9/11 conspiracy virus is sweeping the world, but it has no basis in fact by George Monbiot
• That makes 10,000 sworn to 9/11 silence by Gwynne Dyer

v t e 9/11 conspiracy theories
Key topics	Advance-knowledge conspiracy theories Opinion polls 9/11 truth movement World Trade Center controlled demolition conspiracy theories
Groups	Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Million Muslim March
Film and TV	911: In Plane Site A Few Days in September Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura Loose Change "Mystery of the Urinal Deuce" Zeitgeist
Books	9/11: The Big Lie American Conspiracies Among the Truthers Debunking 9/11 Myths The CIA and September 11 The New Pearl Harbor The Terror Timeline
Category

• 2005 films
• Alternative theories of September 11, 2001 attacks
• Conspiracy theories
• Internet documentaries
• Films based on the September 11, 2001 attacks
• Documentaries about the September 11, 2001 attacks
• Pseudohistory