Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/User names - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Chill doubt (talk | contribs) at 13:11, 15 October 2007 (TheUNOFFICIALvandalpolice: disallow). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 13:11, 15 October 2007 by Chill doubt (talk | contribs) (TheUNOFFICIALvandalpolice: disallow)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This miscellaneous page is being considered for deletion in accordance with Misplaced Pages's deletion policy.
Please discuss the matter at this page's entry on the Miscellany for Deletion page.
You are welcome to edit this page, but please do not blank, merge, or move this page (without knowing exactly what you are doing), or remove this notice, while the discussion is in progress. For more information, read the Guide to Deletion.

Maintenance use only: {{subst:mfd}}/{{subst:mfdx|2nd}} {{subst:md2|pg=Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User names|text=...}} {{subst:md3|pg=Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User names}} log


Shortcuts
Navigation: ArchivesInstructions for closing administratorsPurge page cache

This page is for bringing attention to usernames which may be in violation of Misplaced Pages's username policy. Before listing a username here, consider if it should be more appropriately reported elsewhere, or if it needs to be reported at all:

Do NOT post here if:

Before adding a name here you MUST ensure that the user in question:

  • has been warned about their username (with e.g. {{subst:uw-username}}) and has been allowed time to address the concern on their user talk page.
  • has disagreed with the concern, refused to change their username and/or continued to edit without replying to the warning.
  • is not already blocked.

If, after having followed all the steps above, you still believe the username violates Misplaced Pages's username policy, you may list it here with an explanation of which part of the username policy you think has been violated. After posting, please alert the user of the discussion (with e.g. {{subst:UsernameDiscussion}}). You may also invite others who have expressed concern about the username to comment on the discussion by use of this template.

Add new requests below, using the syntax {{subst:rfcn1|username|2=reason ~~~~}}.

Tools: Special:ListUsers, Special:BlockList


Reports

Please remember that this is not a vote, rather, it is a place where admins or other users can go when they are unsure what to do with a username, to get a few outside opinions (hence it's named "requests for comment"). Bolded recommendations are not necessary.

TheUNOFFICIALvandalpolice

TheUNOFFICIALvandalpolice (talk · contribs)

The username implies an official role on wikipedia even with the term "unofficial" in it, it also glamourises vandalism where we should deny it. Another major problem with the username is that every time it edits, people are going to see the word vandal and immediately check through the users contributions, wasting time. I've attempted to discuss this with the user, but he hasn't been interested. Ryan Postlethwaite 12:52, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

AnarcistPig

The following discussion is an archived debate of the username below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment/User names). No further edits should be made to this section.

Allow - enough discussion has occurred. -- Anonymous Dissident 06:40, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

AnarcistPig (talk · contribs)

Spelling error notwithstanding, this name appears to be a slur upon a group. It's certainly not appropriate for an editor intent upon contributing to an encyclopedia. I've blocked the user temporarily for abuse, but I'll be happy to unblock to enable a user name change. Rklawton 17:53, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
FenianSwine was allowed, as a self-deprecating jokey name; it's grand-fathered in but that name is far more offensive than this one. This is similar; the user identifies as an anarchist, and is thus calling themself an anarchist pig. Dan Beale-Cocks 23:02, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Sounds like a pun on "capitalist pig" if you ask me. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 23:13, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
The name seems OK to me. I don't believe the name is likely to cause offense to anarchists though the image on his user page might cause offense to pigs. However his personal attacks on your talk page and response to your notification of this issue are completely unacceptable and deserve a civility warning if nothing else. Euryalus 00:39, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
I think that enough discussion has occurred here for any admin to make a decision regarding this name. I choose not to block considering the consensus interpretation of policy and the name, another admin may choose differently. I suggest someone uninvolved close this. 1 != 2 16:33, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the entries talk page). No further edits should be made to this page.

Greengreg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the username below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment/User names). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result was allow – clearly no violation and not a disruptive username, concerns about the user's behaviour may be taken to ANI, WQA etc. Closed a little early per WP:SNOW. Melsaran (talk) 16:26, 12 October 2007 (UTC)


Greengreg (talk · contribs)

I feel his user name is too similar to my own, and he seemed to create it only after he saw mine at State Farm Insurance. It's the only place he's edited. I left a note for him, but no reply, and he's made a few edits since. GreenJoe 03:45, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

allow Although he was inspired by your name, I think they are significantly different. Greg and Joe are two completely different names. Shipjangseng 04:01, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

It is if it's related to the intent of the user and their purpose, as this case is. Rlevse 14:47, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
I agree, the users edits should weigh on their purpose here. That would be a good discussion for ANI for trolling, disruption, etc. I would just strongly suggest to only look at the relevance of the users name here. It is too easy to get side tracked and make a decision on the username, based off of information that has nothing to do with the users name. In this case the name should be allowed. However, if the name is used for trolling it should be discussed at ANI, warned if necessary, blocked if appropriate, indef if no alternative (IMO). But generally I do agree with your logic, Rlevse. 68.143.88.2 14:51, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the entries talk page). No further edits should be made to this page.

Road to a Quintillion usernames

The following discussion is an archived debate of the username below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment/User names). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result was: Disallow - unanimous since discovering similarity to a known sock/vandal. Rlevse 01:06, 12 October 2007 (UTC)


Road to a Quintillion usernames (talk · contribs)

I just want to ensure this username doesn't violate user name policy per length before I start editing. I figure the best way to assume good faith would be to let the people decide! Road to a Quintillion usernames 03:36, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
I just want to make sure my username is appropriate. I've racked up many hours on Misplaced Pages reading articles and policies, and figure if I register a name that I fancy, that happens to be long, I'd make sure it isn't too long. Road to a Quintillion usernames 03:55, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

*It is not offensive and longer than average, but nowhere near the length where people would object based on length. It's also comprehensible. Rlevse 12:02, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

comment So if you have a name that is "similar" to a vandal's, per policy that is a blockable offense? Thats news to me. 68.143.88.2 15:03, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the entries talk page). No further edits should be made to this page.

God doesn't exist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the username below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment/User names). No further edits should be made to this section.


Disallowed. (1) This is clearly inflammatory and provocative, and (2) RFCN is not an appropriate venue for appealing blocks. Take it up with Rlevse, or at WP:ANI if that fails. (closed by Mangojuice)


God doesn't exist (talk · contribs)

User:Rlevse blocked this user name on sight. Unforturnately, both the blocker and blocked participated the following discussion - GodDelusion which involves debating atheist statement violates RFCN. The blocking of this account by the said user might violate WP:POINT and WP:AGF. Procedural placement on RFCN. I'm neutral on this. SYSS Mouse 22:39, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the entries talk page). No further edits should be made to this page.