Misplaced Pages

User talk:A Nobody

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by A Nobody (talk | contribs) at 04:10, 17 October 2007 (reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 04:10, 17 October 2007 by A Nobody (talk | contribs) (reply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:A_Nobody.

Welcome to my talk page! Please be sure to make all posts civil and constructive, as I'll revert anything I deem to be vandalism. Also, let us try to keep two-way conversations readable. If you post to my talk page, I will just reply here. If I posted recently to another talk page, including your talk page, then that means I have it on my watchlist and will just read responses there. I may refactor discussions to your talk page for the same reason. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles My Talk Archives: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

re:Welcome

No thanks. I'm already an editor, I am using my ip to avoid backlash while commenting on User:Prester John, whom is an editor which I do not want harassing my real account.--71.141.106.98 17:24, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Okay, take care. --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 17:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Hey. I'm just popping in to say thanks for your use of "Best", "Sincerely" and the like. Not only is that simply polite, it's the little touches that remind us of the easily forgotten but vital fact that there are humans on the other end of the network cable, and such little touches often have large results. In addition, the endings remind people that the written word is the written word, not a deficient substitute for the spoken word as it's commonly used as online. Thank you. --Kizor 00:16, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Dear Kizor, you are welcome and thank you for the kind note as well. I greatly appreciate reading such a positive and thoughtful message! Editors like yourself who take the time to write such kind messages really help to make the project worthwhile. I hope you are having a wonderful week!  :) Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 00:19, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Bearian'sBooties

Hi and thanks for the welcome. I'm User:Bearian's legal sock-puppet. Bearian'sBooties 02:37, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome! All the best! --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 06:23, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Refs and links

For Godzilla, please enter books and book chapters and journal articles as references to specific parts of the article, rather than as external links. If they're general, do it to the lede paragraph. I moved the first of them as an example of format. DGG (talk) 07:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Dear DGG, Thank you for the suggestion! I may be a bit busy this week, though, as I have a couple lectures and a significant meeting. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 07:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

My User: Subpages

re: this question. Yes, definitely, edit away at anything you see there. Might be a good idea to add comments of your own to the table at User:AndyJones/Deleted trivia if the status of a page chages for the better. AndyJones 12:27, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Cool, thanks for the reply. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 16:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

The Herbert Dingle article and vandalism

Thanks for your message. I do actually have a problem. I'm trying to write a factual article about Herbert Dingle and a vandal called DVdm keeps removing the important ingredients. Can you please look at my latest reversion. That is the way that I believe it should be. It is clear, interesting, and doesn't advocate either a pro- or anti POV as regards the controversy.

DVdm on the other hand wants to replace it with a less coherent version which states that Dingle was wrong and which waters down the details of the controversy. I'd be grateful if you would keep an eye on the article. (Brigadier Armstrong 16:27, 10 October 2007 (UTC))

Sure, I'll look it over. One thing to keep in mind is to always be sure you have reliable references provided so that no one can justifiably challenge your edits as biased or unfounded. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 16:30, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

OK, I've seen now what you've done. You've put a reference beside the relevant phrase on the introduction line. Thank you very much indeed.(Brigadier Armstrong 16:46, 10 October 2007 (UTC))

You're welcome! :) Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 16:47, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Somebody has reverted it already. It will surely be DVdm using an anonymous IP server. (Brigadier Armstrong 16:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC))

Try to discuss the reverts civily with DVdm or the anonymous IP. If that doesn't work then perhaps consider first, a third opinion and second a request for comment: Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment as a means of resolving the dispute. Please read the instructions on those pages carefully to determine the appropriate option and the right way to make the request. Always, be sure to remain civil. Again, good luck! Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 16:57, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello from User:MurderWatcher1

I see that you have edited a page that I have created, one for Jennifer Moore. I decided to do a quick check of your user page and I'm pleased that you're concerned when an editor's work is about to be deleted. This is currently occurring on ] where you will see my UserName and the discussions of the pages that I have created. I would appreciate a positive comment from you on that page, of course, when you've seen what I have tried to do with the Imette St. Guillen, Jennifer Moore, Ramona Moore and Chanel Petro-Nixon references. While I didn't create Imette's page, I did become involved in her case, as you will see from my userpage. Thank you for any help that you can provide to me.User:MurderWatcher1 (Manually time stamping at 5:35 p.m. EST as the toolbar isn't working for me for some reason). —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 21:36, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello and thank you for your message; I'll look through your articles and check over at the discussion. Have a nice night! Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 00:40, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your input on the Administrators' Page. It is greatly appreciated. It is interesting that they will delete my work and yet, there is a page being mentioned on that same discussion reference on the History of Pedophilia! They have this up there and they want to delete my work? 'Let's have some sanity on this forum' is my argument. Again, thank you. Your comment means much to me.--MurderWatcher1 16:44, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
You're welcome! Have a wonderful weekend! Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 16:48, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

My recent RfA

Thank you for supporting my RfA, which unfortunately didn't succeed. The majority of the opposes stated that I needed more experience in the main namespace and Misplaced Pages namespace, so that is what I will do. I will go for another RfA in two month's time and I hope you will be able to support me then as well. If you have any other comments for me or wish to be notified when I go for another RfA, please leave them on my talk page. If you wish to nominate me for my next RfA, please wait until it has been two months. Thanks again for participating in my RfA! -- Cobi 01:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Dear Cobi, you are welcome and I am sorry it did not work out. Good luck next time around and have a wonderful weekend! Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 01:57, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Yeoman editor

This editor is a
Yeoman Editor
and is entitled to display this Service Badge.

Cheers, Durova 14:20, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 15:30, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Drat, that was exactly what I came here to do. Congratulations, Roi. I'm glad you've been with us for - all things considered - a very successful and productive year. Well done!--chaser - t 23:04, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you and I hope you are having a wonderful weekend! Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 23:10, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Hey, there!

Hey, Le Grand Roi, ya there? Well, can you please help me with Visual Basic 2005, please? I need help with a calculator program.--The source of the cosmos... 11:42, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello! I am not familiar with that program. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 17:35, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Ghosttown

Your opinion is needed at Ghosttown, Oakland, California. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 20:58, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi! I added a suggestion on the talk page. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 00:27, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

We are taking a vote at Ghosttown now. IT looks like everyone is voting to delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talkcontribs) 16:06, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello! I posted my thoughts. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 16:18, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

AFD Comments

Several times I've seen you urge us to keep articles simply because the article "looks good" or "is really well put together". It would be much more helpful if you would actually consider our requirements for deletion/inclusion, and actually comment on those points. The aesthetics of an article have no relevance. Thanks. /Blaxthos 22:04, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the suggestions. Have a nice night! Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 00:25, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
GRC--please take this seriously--such are not convincing arguments, except as counter when someone is arguing for deletion of a list or something a being unmaintainable, or hopeless poorly done or intrinsically impossible to write properly. DGG (talk) 04:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Okay, take care! Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 04:10, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

RfA Thanks

Dear A Nobody, 
 ______  __                       __                               __     
/\__  _\/\ \                     /\ \                             /\ \    
\/_/\ \/\ \ \___      __      ___\ \ \/'\   __  __    ___   __  __\ \ \   
   \ \ \ \ \  _ `\  /'__`\  /' _ `\ \ , <  /\ \/\ \  / __`\/\ \/\ \\ \ \  
    \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \/\ \_\.\_/\ \/\ \ \ \\`\\ \ \_\ \/\ \_\ \ \ \_\ \\ \_\ 
     \ \_\ \ \_\ \_\ \__/.\_\ \_\ \_\ \_\ \_\/`____ \ \____/\ \____/ \/\_\
      \/_/  \/_/\/_/\/__/\/_/\/_/\/_/\/_/\/_/`/___/> \/___/  \/___/   \/_/
                                                /\___/                    
                                                \/__/                     
For your contribution to My RfA, which passed with 8000 Supports, 2 Neutrals and no opposes.    

The standards and dedication of the English Wikipeidan Administrators is excellent and I am privileged to stand among them. Thankyou for putting you trust in me, I'll not see it abused. And now, I will dance naked around a fire. Party at my place! Cheers! Dfrg.msc 09:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Expand for picture....
You're welcome and congratulations! :) Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 15:46, 16 October 2007 (UTC)