This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Into The Fray (talk | contribs) at 23:05, 24 October 2007 (→Civility: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:05, 24 October 2007 by Into The Fray (talk | contribs) (→Civility: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog. The same goes for WP. I am a committed canine exopedian, and I am extrememly uninterested in interacting with other users here or on other talk pages, except for those projects that I choose to involve myself in, like CFD. Therefore, if you must leave a message, please be aware that I probably won't respond. In fact, I can't respond. I'm a dog, remember, and dogs can't speak, much less type. What are you doing trying to talk with a dog anyway? Pass the snausages and happy editing (but just not here, please), –Snocrates. |
|
An article which you started, or significantly expanded, George J. Adams, was selected for DYK!
|
On October 16, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article George J. Adams, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 (talk) 03:22, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
United Church of Christ a "National Church"?
In what sense is the United Church of Christ a "national church"? Emerymat 02:23, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- I assume because it claims pastoral jurisdiction over all the United States. I merely placed those listed in National church into the pre-existing category. If you don't agree that it belongs you should remove it from category and list in article. Snocrates 04:25, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank You
Thank you for adding the article about the General Assembly: Church of the Firstborn! 137.240.136.82 11:09, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Civility
Hi there, Snocrates. As I'm sure you're aware, calling folks 'dimwits' in edit summaries ()isn't in accordance with WP:CIVIL. In any event, probably best to avoid comments like that. I do agree with the removal of the section, though. Cheers, Into The Fray /C 23:05, 24 October 2007 (UTC)