This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Alice (talk | contribs) at 05:12, 27 October 2007 (*'''Redirect''' to Iggy Arbuckle ''per'' User:Otto4711 and because of the probable difficulty of locating multiple authoritative independent sources for citation.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:12, 27 October 2007 by Alice (talk | contribs) (*'''Redirect''' to Iggy Arbuckle ''per'' User:Otto4711 and because of the probable difficulty of locating multiple authoritative independent sources for citation.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)The Things We Do for Mud//How Much Wood Can a Wood Pecker Peck?
- The Things We Do for Mud//How Much Wood Can a Wood Pecker Peck? (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This is a trivial episode that fails WP:EPISODE's criteria to build a good episode, and it shows no way to improve. By failing that, it fails WP:N, WP:V, and WP:RS, as it has no sources to assert and establish notability. It also fails WP:NOT#PLOT for being mostly comprised of plot. TTN 17:59, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete—no assertion of notability, no real-world context. Pagrashtak 18:27, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect to Iggy Arbuckle. No indication that the episode is independently notable. A few sentences in the main article will suffice to cover the subject. Otto4711 19:33, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete — Not-notable and not likely ever to be. (But I love the extra slash.) --Jack Merridew 10:42, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- (I've moved it to single-slash title) --Jack Merridew 10:56, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. Mindraker 12:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect to Iggy Arbuckle per User:Otto4711 and because of the probable difficulty of locating multiple authoritative independent sources for citation. Alice.S 05:12, 27 October 2007 (UTC)