This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bobby1011 (talk | contribs) at 02:54, 6 November 2007 (→Warcraft character's AfDs: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:54, 6 November 2007 by Bobby1011 (talk | contribs) (→Warcraft character's AfDs: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome
Hello, DarthSidious, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 05:13, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
ASUE
Hello, DarthSidious and thank you for your contributions on articles related to A Series of Unfortunate Events. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject A Series of Unfortunate Events, a WikiProject aiming to improve coverage of A Series of Unfortunate Events and related articles on Misplaced Pages.
If you would like to help out and participate, please visit the project page for more information. Thanks! <3Clamster 01:03, 15 January 2007 (UTC) |
Edits to Finding Nemo
Please see Misplaced Pages's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
Specifically, please see the definition of widower. It is the male form of "widow," and the verb form applies to both sexes. --Snicker° 15:46, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Kent Hovind
I've reverted some changes you made to the above-referenced article. Please discuss on the talk page if you wish to see them restored. Cheers, ObiterDicta ( pleadings • errata • appeals ) 05:00, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- You seem to have a history with that article. Why not try a dose of WP:TIGERS? ObiterDicta ( pleadings • errata • appeals ) 05:02, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Misleading edit summaries
Please see WP:VANDAL for what constitutes vandalism. Your edit here was not a removal of vandalism and should not have been classified this way. Please make sure your edit summaries actually reflect the edits you make. Seraphimblade 05:02, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Vandalism is defined as anything which intentionally lowers the integrity of the article. Somebody writing "... would have to prove that the universe was not crafted by a race of space aliens" was clearly written to do just that.
Yoda921 04:43, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Yoda
Cross-space redirects
Please don't create cross-space redirects such as Candidates for Speedy deletion. Thanks, NawlinWiki 12:31, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ok ~ I understand this "rule" now. Thanks
Yoda921 12:44, 29 April 2007 (UTC)Yoda
Beyond intelligent design
Your summary comment here borders on a personal attack. I think Filll is well aware of neutral POV on articles. In fact, I found some of your edits to have violate NPOV, although I chose to not get into an edit war with you. Orangemarlin 05:03, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
I wouldn't really consider it to be a "personal attack" per se; do you think that "Mulder repeats the same creationist critiques of evolution that have been dismissed by science for decades. " (unsourced) qualifies as a NPOV statement, even if it was repeated on another website?
DarthSidious 09:53, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Yoda
The Case for Faith
I removed the link you added to The Case for Faith. I do not believe it was an appropriate link as per WP:EL. If you disagree, please leave a message for me on my talk page and we can discuss the issue. Note, though, that linking to non-official commercial sites such as this is almost never permitted. See also WP:SPAM. --Yamla 16:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
It doesn't really matter - although calling it "Spam" was probably going a bit far.
DarthSidious 08:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC)DarthSidious
Request for mediation
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Kent Hovind, and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Misplaced Pages, please refer to Misplaced Pages:Mediation. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation. Thanks, Daniel 13:18, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- I was actually quite concerned when I saw the title of this post. ;)
DarthSidious 15:09, 12 October 2007 (UTC)DarthSidious
Talk: Stormbreaker (novel)
Hi Darth. You may want to look at this page. Akiyama 17:42, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Request for Mediation
A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the case subpage, Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Kent Hovind.
|
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.
Michael Behe
Please don't revert war at Michael Behe. Adam Cuerden 17:19, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Warcraft character's AfDs
When posting responses to deletion canditates on their AfDs, please keep in mind the suggestions on WP:AADD. In particular you have been dismissing the need to give a reasoned argument in favor of simply stating your opinion with no reasons given as to why the articles have merit. The policy guidelines are available for users to decide whether or not any entry is within the scope of the wikipedia project. Bobby1011 02:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC)