This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WAS 4.250 (talk | contribs) at 06:44, 16 November 2007 (:I have seen trusted admins screw-up and say as a penalty they will do such and such that everyone agrees is good for creating an encyclopedia. You would prove a lot if you would undertake to unambi). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:44, 16 November 2007 by WAS 4.250 (talk | contribs) (:I have seen trusted admins screw-up and say as a penalty they will do such and such that everyone agrees is good for creating an encyclopedia. You would prove a lot if you would undertake to unambi)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Feel free to leave a comment or start a discussion below - thanks for dropping by;
- Sounds good to me, this user account is expressive but not disruptive. Thanks, SqueakBox 02:23, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks Squeak, we've not been around each other too much, but yours is a voice I respect - Privatemusings 02:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Welcome back... don't do anything I wouldn't do! :-) *Dan T.* 02:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
It's doing things you would do that got me into this mess! - thanks for the note though... Privatemusings 02:58, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- I have seen trusted admins screw-up and say as a penalty they will do such and such that everyone agrees is good for creating an encyclopedia. You would prove a lot if you would undertake to unambiguously act to improve the encyclopedia. Ask others for what such acts might be if you have doubts. Hint: red links. WAS 4.250 06:44, 16 November 2007 (UTC)