Misplaced Pages

User talk:TStolper1W

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Deepfriedokra (talk | contribs) at 21:39, 3 December 2007 (Not sure this isn't a content dispute.: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:39, 3 December 2007 by Deepfriedokra (talk | contribs) (Not sure this isn't a content dispute.: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Your recent edits

Welcome to Misplaced Pages, and thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, your edits show a mis-understanding of WP:NPOV, and so they have been reverted. It is not a violation of NPOV to note that Randell Mills' work is generally considered pseudoscience - it is required by NPOV that that information be present. Similarly, it is required by NPOV to note that evaluators have accused Mills of plagiarism - regardless of Mills' response to the accusation. Please review and understand WP:NPOV before making any additional edits.

Also, I must issue you a conditional warning: if you have previously edited Misplaced Pages under another account, please be aware of WP:SOCK. Editors are not permitted to use multiple accounts for the same types of edits. If you have not previously edited Misplaced Pages, but have been asked to make particular types of edits by someone who has, that is considered the same. If your edits are strictly of your own volition, I apologize for issuing this warning, but it is necessary due to past activity relating to Mills. Michaelbusch 19:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from pages on Misplaced Pages without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. The justifications you have been giving do not apply. Thank you. Michaelbusch 20:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, you will be blocked from editing. For the last time: NPOV requires mention of criticism. Michaelbusch 21:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content from Misplaced Pages, you will be blocked from editing. Michaelbusch 21:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Not sure this isn't a content dispute.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Dlohcierekim