Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Stifle (talk | contribs) at 12:31, 5 December 2007 (→Balkans arbitration remedy: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Correcting terminology...

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Grandy Grandy, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Philip Baird Shearer 10:16, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Bosnian Genocide

Please note you edit ( Bosnian Genocide Revision as of 11:28, 11 October 2007) altered the introduction from:

On February 26, 2007 the International Court of Justice (ICJ), in the Bosnian Genocide Case upheld the ICTY's earlier finding that the Srebrenica massacre constituted genocide, but found that there had been no wider genocide on the territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina during the war, as the Bosnian government had claimed.

to

On February 26, 2007 the International Court of Justice (ICJ), in the Bosnian Genocide Case upheld the ICTY's earlier finding that the Srebrenica massacre constituted genocide.

You wrote on the Bosnian Genocide talk page "PBS, I think you are biased, and that is not good for Misplaced Pages. You are not the God, and this is not your property." I do not think I am God nor do I think the page is my property. Misplaced Pages has a policy of presenting information from a neutral point of view please read that policy and the other content policies of Verifiability and no original research. If you read them I think you will see that I am not trying to do anything on the Bosnian Genocide page that is not within the spirit of those policies. I look forward to working constructively with you on developing this page further or turning it into a redirect to the if that is what the consensus is. --Philip Baird Shearer 10:16, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Bosnian Genocide request for mediation

Please see Misplaced Pages:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-11-23 Bosnian Genocide --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 19:31, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Bosniaks

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bosniaks. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. --Ronz (talk) 20:12, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

--Ronz (talk) 22:02, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Introduction

I have read your introduction, but I don't understand why you excluded sentences about massacres in Prijedor, Foča, Sarajevo etc.? It is all confirmed by ICJ and defined as crime against humanity. The Dragon of Bosnia (talk) 23:35, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Ivan Kricancic case

Please just take a look here - if you know anything about that feel free to tell me. The Dragon of Bosnia (talk) 21:19, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Ok, but Later...Grandy Grandy (talk) 22:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Balkans arbitration remedy

In a recently-closed arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose sanctions on any user working on articles concerning the Balkans. Before any such sanctions are imposed, editors are to be put on notice of the decision. This notice is not to be taken as implying any inappropriate behaviour on your part, merely to warn you of the Arbitration Committee's decision. Stifle (talk) 12:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)