This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Charles (talk | contribs) at 04:03, 26 December 2007 (→Piotrus 2). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:03, 26 December 2007 by Charles (talk | contribs) (→Piotrus 2)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)> Misplaced Pages talk:Administrators open to recall
Piotrus 1
Admin: Piotrus (talk · contribs)
Request: made 23 June 2006; archived here
Result: Unsuccessful; threshold not met.
Merovingian
Admin: Merovingian (talk · contribs)
Request: made 19 July 2006; archived here
Result: Unsuccessful/withdrawn.
Crzrussian
Admin: Crzrussian (talk · contribs)
Request: made 7 August 2006; archived here
Result: Successful; threshold met. Crzrussian chose to resign rather than seek immediate reconfirmation, and was resysopped at RfA two months later.
Bunchofgrapes
Admin: Bunchofgrapes (talk · contribs)
Request: made 21 August 2006; archived here
Result: Unsuccessful; threshold not met.
Friday
Admin: Friday (talk · contribs)
Request: made 23 December 2006; archived here
Result: Unsuccessful; threshold not met.
Piotrus 2
Admin: Piotrus (talk · contribs)
Request: made 21 January 2007 by User:Irpen who saw Piotrus' conduct in the conflict with Ghirlandajo and Dr. Dan as "unethical" and "unbecoming for an admin"; archived here and here
Result: Unsuccessful, as only a single user made the request. Piotrus has specified his criteria (six editors in good standing by his own criteria, on a matter related to admin tools). Piotrus asserted that the matter is not related to the use of admin tools; the discussion ended 1) according to Irpen "after Piotrus repeatedly refused to answer" and 2) according to Piotrus 2) "before it was made clear" whether Irpen meets Piotrus' own criteria for good standing.
- Comment. I will state here clearly for the future record that one of my requirements is "that the user should be neutral towards my person." Irpen is not neutral towards my person, as has been determined by ArbCom. I thought it was obvious then, and I certainly hope it is obvious now. EOT.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 21:55, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I will gladly comment on the next recall for Piotrus as I believe he does act in an unethical, unfair and abusive manner and it is getting to a point where it is is frustrating to go through his routine over and over. Charles 04:02, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Misza13
Admin: Misza13 (talk · contribs)
Request: made 10 May 2007 by User:Nae'blis, because of a bot used to block improper user names; archived here
Result: Unsuccessful. Only a single user made the request, several users disagreed, and the matter of recalling was not responded to any further.
Ryulong 1
Admin: Ryulong (talk · contribs)
Request: made 20 July 2007; over perceived newbie-biting and an overly harsh block; archived here
Result: After some discussion and an apology by Ryulong, the five requesters withdrew their request for a recall.
Ryulong 2
Admin: Ryulong (talk · contribs)
Request: made 24 August 2007; it is unclear from the request what the reason was; archived here
Result: Unsuccessful. Everyking asked what Ryulong's criteria for being recalled were; the response was that he had yet to flesh out those things, but was "unwilling to bend to sudden whims for a lynching".
Durova
Admin: Durova (talk · contribs)
Request: begun 21 November 2007; archives 1 2 3 4 5
Result: Following recall requests made at her talk page, at AN/I, and in an RfC, together with escalation of the root issue to ArbComm, Durova resigned her adminship.
Mercury
Admin: Mercury (talk · contribs)
Request: begun 10 December 2007, based on Misplaced Pages:Deletion_review/Angela_Beesley, the block of !!, and his nonsupport for arbitration committee candidacy; to the relevant discussion.
Result: Recall was brought up on user talk. Mercury removed himself from the category, then later reconsidered and agreed to the recall proceedings. After the recall petition was certified and the recall RFC started, Mercury removed himself from the category again and declared the RFC closed. The next day Mercury requested that his bit be removed.