This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Phirazo (talk | contribs) at 18:48, 6 January 2008 (→Talk:Homeopathy: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:48, 6 January 2008 by Phirazo (talk | contribs) (→Talk:Homeopathy: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)User talk:Smith Jones/My carhive
Talk:Homeopathy
Hello. I saw your comments in the talk. There is a very serious bias in the article now, I agree. I would suggest you make very careful and specific observations in the talk. If you have experience in controversial Misplaced Pages articles, you should expect that it will take time to work out. It will not be helpful to make personal accusations, even if you have private ideas of people's motivations. If you want to discuss it further, I'm happy to do so. —Whig (talk) 06:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- You're brilliant! You should do stand up, you remind me of Mark Thomas. It's a shame Whig didn't get the joke, but sometimes there's no joking with these people. You might want to put a blinking JOKE tag next to your comments in future!! Cheers! --88.172.132.94 (talk) 18:40, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Homeopathy
Why did you move the section I started and change the time stamp? It is generally considered impolite to do so. If it was a mistake, please be more careful next time, or use the section editing feature. Thanks, --Phirazo 18:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)