Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JoshuaZ (talk | contribs) at 00:15, 20 January 2008 (→Marsden: followup). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

— Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

The current local time is: 21:52, 12 January 2025 (GMT)

• .JS
• .CSS
• 1A
• AFC
• DW
• ESP
• ETP
• FAC
• GAC
• MATH
• PC
• PLUSING
• RC
• RM
• TSPACE
• USPACE

Only 52098 articles (0.751%) are featured or good. Make a difference: improve an article!

Centralized TV Episode Discussion

Over the past months, TV episodes have been reverted by (to name a few) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here . --Maniwar (talk) 18:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

For her birthday (what I said in the e-mail...)

Image:Bildtankstelle 1 004.jpg —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  05:39 18 January, 2008 (UTC)

Re: 2007 Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation, Short Form featured topic?

Well, I really have no knowledge of the other articles, but I'll be happy to look at what's been done so far and see what I can do. What would be the lead article, though? David Fuchs 20:18, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I get that, but according to WP:FT?, we need "an introductory and summary lead article" to link the winners together. That's what we're short on. David Fuchs 22:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Prolly the latter (althought I'm not sure what the process for that is.) Either way, I'll work on "The Girl in the Fireplace" to start with ('cause that has the most to work with... I admit it I'm lazy. :) David Fuchs 22:13, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Episodes and characters 2

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Episodes and characters 2/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Episodes and characters 2/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Daniel (talk) 21:47, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Marsden

The DRV is unambiguous. The fact that she keeps harassing us into deleting this content is hardly relevant. It is all well-sourced. If you have a specific complaint with the content other than Marsden not liking the content please explain it. JoshuaZ (talk) 00:00, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

The Hovind similarity should actually be pretty obvious. The difference is one of degree, not of kind. I can see why Sun Media by itself might not be noteworthy enough (and wouldn't object if you only removed that section). The remaining content however I don't see a compelling reason to remove. And for that matter, there's a simple reason that most of the article is controversy- she's a very controversial person. I do intend to add more from the deleted versions that isn't controversy, but if you think a specific item should be removed then please discuss it on the talk page rather than simply revert. JoshuaZ (talk) 00:14, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

The edit you just made for example seems more reasonable than complete removal. JoshuaZ (talk) 00:15, 20 January 2008 (UTC)