Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by El C (talk | contribs) at 23:18, 14 July 2005 (→So you are a Keith Wigdor Fan?: Please cease immediately from editing my talk page (I have no further interest in editing yours, and you are free to delete everything that I have written above).). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Not sure what you're talking about – I remember you from Keith Wigdor, but I'm afraid I can't recall whether you were anti or pro-Wigdor. In case you are the former, sorry, I'm a Wigdor fan and I am entitled to hold that opinion. At any rate, please don't vandalize my talk page again. Thanks, El_C 21:12, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

So you are a Keith Wigdor Fan?

Then explain this,

"Hi, Alai. I want to congratulate you on a job well done at the Keith Wigdor article. You really did all the dirty, difficult work: it was less of a good cop - bad cop than absentee cop - cop. ;) Sorry I had to drop out, some pressing matters in and beyond WP. Surrealist toast !" El_C 05:12, 1 Mar 2005

By the way, I kindly disagree with you about your rude comment, "vandalizing your talk page". All I did was remove a copyright protected image of the great Che. If this really is a public domain image (please prove so) then you are entitled to display it on your talk page, but (please prove me wrong) I am positive that the image of Che is copyright protected. Anyway, I am concerned about your attempts to humiliate the surrealist that you claim to be a fan. I was doing research on Surrealism upon doing a google search on Surrealism and Keith Wigdor's name came up in the google search. Then I did a google search on the name Keith Wigdor and user Alais' archived talk page came up with your statements. Why do you claim to be a fan, when you blantantly admit to your plan to delete a Misplaced Pages article about him that you, yourself, requested an art image for the article, and then you go and make a public statement on Alai's page, that it was a "good cop", "bad cop" plan to humiliate and abuse this surrealist! Oh, please do not delete my statements from your talk page.Classicjupiter2 22:53, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

That image is marked fairuse, please do not modify, or make any additional comments to my talk page. And now that I recollect that passage, I commended Alai for mediating between both pro and anti Wigdor parties. Whether I am a fan or not has no bearing on notability — but at the event, I was one of very few editors who actually voted to KEEP the Wigdor article. Out. El_C 23:01, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

I kindly disagree with you. Whether or not you voted to keep the article, does not make a bit of difference when reading your statement to Alai. This was a plan by the both of you, "good cop" "bad cop" to get a VfD on the article. You even congratulated this user Alai.Classicjupiter2 23:08, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

That is false. I wanted to make the article succeed, but at the time of writing that, it appeared to me that there was a lot of trolling, circularity, and ample verbosity from both sides. Your accusations are false, and I am uninterested in discussing the issue further with you. El_C 23:12, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Please cease immediately from editing my talk page (I have no further interest in editing yours, and you are free to delete everything that I have written above). If you persist, it counts as vandalism which you may be blocked for. El_C 23:18, 14 July 2005 (UTC)