This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RkOrton (talk | contribs) at 00:03, 6 February 2008 (→Zoey 101: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:03, 6 February 2008 by RkOrton (talk | contribs) (→Zoey 101: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)How to use talk pages: (guidelines from Template:User talk top)
- Please continue any conversation where it was started.
- Thus if I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here.
- I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
- If you want to initiate a conversation, please create a new heading here.
- Continue existing conversations under existing headings.
- Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
- Indent your comments when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
- Sign your comments automatically using ~~~~.
Archives: 070625-070920-071102-071231-080131
Vandalism on Alicia Keys Page
Excuse me Sir or Madam,
I noticed that you recently reverted some vandalism on the Alicia Keys page, where someone using an IP address only increased the subject's age by 30 years. Well, this edit has been undone from the same IP address. TelecomNut (talk) 22:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info - taken care of. --NrDg 22:36, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Zoey 101: Clip Show
Thank you for your message. I am aware that people have made many false episodes. "Clip Show" is not one of those episodes. There is a summary on TV.com and a video of it on Stage6.com. I do not know if it is before or after "Goodbye Zoey?" but there is one flashback from that episode, so I assume it is after. However, there is also one flashback from "Fake Roommate" even though the theme is Season 3. Aik Hui (talk) 06:42, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Aik Hui
Edits to the Dylan and Cole Sprouse page
I reverted a sentence in the page (see diff) which was reinserted by User:Zsero . He initiated a discussion abt letting the statement remain while i am against it. The discussion is here. I feel that in absence of reliable secondary source, we shd not include it whereas he feels that unless it is proven false we shd let it remain. I feel that it is libelious if we let that unsourced info remain whereas he feels that it is "harmless gossip" and not at all libelious. I would request u to Pls take a look at the discussion and advice.Thanx Gprince007 (talk) 11:03, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- I looked into it. Added to discussion on talk page. --NrDg 14:48, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Zoey 101
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Zoey 101. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. NimiTize 00:03, 6 February 2008 (UTC)