This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Seminarist (talk | contribs) at 20:59, 15 February 2008 (Comments). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:59, 15 February 2008 by Seminarist (talk | contribs) (Comments)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)NPOV on John Zizioulas page
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to John Zizioulas. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Cebactokpatop (talk) 14:25, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
I have not vandalised the John Zizioulas page. You appear to be retaliating to my removal of vandalism which you placed on the John Zizioulas page by adding a vandalism tag to my talk page. The reason I added a vandalism tag was your picture of Zizioulas sitting beside the Pope which had been labelled 'Picture of the John Zizioulas (black robe) revealing his true face and position.' Please see Misplaced Pages BLP.
Yes you have. You are promoting "pro" Zizioulas view by calling all those who disagree with you "vandals". Your attempt to hide the fact that many people disagree with his work is obvious. What is very low is the way you are tying to do it.
Cebactokpatop (talk) 20:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Being derogatory does not help build consensus.
You are wrong - I am not trying to hide any views. I only want the article to be encyclopedic and NPOV. I would be very glad if you would provide NPOV verifiable descriptions of criticisms of Zizioulas.