This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rmhermen (talk | contribs) at 11:52, 3 September 2002. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:52, 3 September 2002 by Rmhermen (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Will the page be replaced when East Timor has an entry in the CIA World Factbook?
When discussing the event in East Timor (and probably many other places) you can't ignore the effects and influence of the arms trade on the development of those events. The following are just a few of the available sources. http://www.motherjones.com/arms/indonesia.html http://www.worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/reports/indoarms.html http://www.worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/reports/indo101001.htm#weapons2 http://www.wagingpeace.org/articles/armstradecodeofconduct.htm
For British involvement http://www.oneworld.org/ips2/sept99/14_45_070.html Eclecticology 09:57 Sep 3, 2002 (PDT)
From the article:
- Throughout the period 1975-1995 more than a billion dollars worth of American weapons were sold to Indonesia.
- In addition, 80 million dollars of free equipment was provided between 1975 and 1982.
- The sale of arms to any country intending to use them for aggressive purposes is illegal under American law.
It would help the article if someone could document any of the above points. I'd particularly like to see a definition of the word "aggressive" in the 3rd point.
Also, in general it's more helpful (and less provocative) to attribute claims to their proponents, as in The People's Movement for a Free and Independent East Timor said that... or whatever the case may be. Then it doesn't matter so much what the US really did: the article is only reporting what the PMFIET said they did. --Ed Poor
What caused Timor to develop into East and West? Different ethnic groups? Different colonial masters? Rmhermen 11:52 Sep 3, 2002 (PDT)