Misplaced Pages

:Possibly unfree files/2008 February 23 - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Possibly unfree files

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PC78 (talk | contribs) at 01:11, 24 February 2008 (Image:BerniceLiuRedPacket.jpg). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 01:11, 24 February 2008 by PC78 (talk | contribs) (Image:BerniceLiuRedPacket.jpg)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
< February 22 February 24 >

February 23

Image:Anthony-epps-25.jpg

Appears to be an WP:SPA using {{PD-self}} illigetimately to curcumvent the WP:NFCC. — pd_THOR | 07:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Dr Cook BB Western.JPG

The image is tagged public domain but has a comment that the copyright holder gave the uploader permission to post the image on Misplaced Pages. Has the copyright holder in fact released the photo into the public domain? --Una Smith (talk) 07:02, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Robertas_Javtokas.jpg

no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Andrey_Vorontsevich.jpg

no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:19, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Alexey_Shved.jpg

no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:19, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Thomas_Van_Den_Spiegel.jpg

no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Anatoly_Kashirov.jpg

no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Mindaugas_Lukauskis.jpg

no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Kenan_Bajramović.jpg

no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Chuck_Eidson.jpg

no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Marcus_Goree.jpg

no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:FinalFour_2008.jpg

no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Rodina_Stadium.jpg

no evidence of GFDL in the source Rettetast (talk) 09:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Ishida_with_seeleschneider.png

no evidence of GFDL. Image found on google Rettetast (talk) 12:06, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:06MGR 45 chantier vn 19 d'ensemble 2A.jpg

I could not find any evidence of the GFDL on the site the description page says the image came from - therefore I assume it is copyrighted and therefore non-free. Andreworkney (talk) 12:27, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Nicole Lapin WIKI.jpg

See Misplaced Pages:Possibly_unfree_images/2008_February_23#Image:Nicole_Lapin_pic.jpg BlueAzure (talk) 16:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Nicole Lapin WIKI 1.jpg

See Misplaced Pages:Possibly_unfree_images/2008_February_23#Image:Nicole_Lapin_pic.jpg BlueAzure (talk) 16:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Nicole Lapin exposay.jpg

See Misplaced Pages:Possibly_unfree_images/2008_February_23#Image:Nicole_Lapin_pic.jpg BlueAzure (talk) 16:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Nicole Lapin pic.jpg

All of these photos of Nicole Lapin have a statement from the photographer releasing the photo into the public domain. Its pretty clear that these are false. Three SPA's uploaded photos claiming to be Laura Grier: Bobbo1 (talk · contribs) uploaded Image:Nicole Lapin pic.jpg, Newmunch (talk · contribs) uploaded Image:Nicole Lapin WIKI.jpg, and Newzie (talk · contribs) uploaded Image:Nicole Lapin WIKI 1.jpg. Bobbo1 is probably a sockpuppet of Rock100 (talk · contribs). According to Rock100's logs they uploaded a photo of Nicole Lapin claiming to be Laura Grier several days before Bobbo1 and several of the other photos Bobbo1 uploaded had been previously uploaded by Rock100. A few hours after Bobbo1 uploaded Image:Nicole Lapin pic.jpg, a SPA Exposay1 (talk · contribs) uploaded Image:Nicole Lapin exposay.jpg claiming to be David Gabber. BlueAzure (talk) 16:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Anthonygreen.jpg

No evidence that the uploader holds copyright — PC78 (talk) 19:12, 23 February 2008 (UTC).

Image:WIKIHEADSHOT.jpg

No evidence that the uploader is the subject of the image (unlikely), or that the subject has given permission for this image to be used — PC78 (talk) 19:16, 23 February 2008 (UTC).

Image:DCDouglas.jpg

No evidence that the uploader has created this image or holds copyright — PC78 (talk) 19:25, 23 February 2008 (UTC).

Image:Lee_Tergesen_in_2005.jpg

Only remaining image by uploader unproven to be a copyright violation. Appears to be another upload using an illigetimate license to circumvent WP:NFCC#1. — pd_THOR | 20:07, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:BerniceLiuRedPacket.jpg

No evidence that the uploader holds copyright — PC78 (talk) 20:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC).

What kind of evidence do you want? want me to take a picture of the full thing instead of just cutting the top? Dengero (talk) 22:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
With respect, it looks like this is an image taken from a website or scanned from a magazine or somewhere. If that is the case, then you are not the copyright holder. If you are the original photographer (which I doubt), or have been granted permission to use this image on Misplaced Pages, then please provide some evidence that this is the case. PC78 (talk) 01:11, 24 February 2008 (UTC)