This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hipal (talk | contribs) at 21:02, 23 March 2008 (→3 Revert Rule). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:02, 23 March 2008 by Hipal (talk | contribs) (→3 Revert Rule)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Stalking
There is definitely a problem with certain editors stalking Wiki contributors with whom they have personal vendettas against and butchering articles out of malice which they have absolutely zero understanding of. This behavior only diminishes the usefulness of Misplaced Pages and forces readers to seek alternative sources of the information they are looking for.--Editor5435 (talk) 06:03, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Editing Misplaced Pages a waste of time?
Its becoming a complete waste of time to trying to maintain Wiki articles. My time is better spent elsewhere. Anyone considering becoming a Misplaced Pages editor should realize what they can be dragged into. I can see why Google is still the best source of information on the Internet.--Editor5435 (talk) 04:36, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
The discussion page on Misplaced Pages itself states:
"Should there be mention of the fact that because it is so unreliable as a source of citation, WP is banned in most UK Universities?"
I guess I had higher expectations of what this was all about and had no idea about the type of unsavory characters participating in Misplaced Pages before signing up.
Links
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Misplaced Pages. It is considered spamming and Misplaced Pages is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Misplaced Pages uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Misplaced Pages will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. --Ronz (talk) 20:34, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- You are sadly mistaken, you don't have the slightest clue as to what you're talking about, STOP your nonsense!--Editor5435 (talk) 20:41, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- If you truly think so, then find someone that agrees with you rather than attacking other editors. See WP:DR for possible ways of getting others involved. --Ronz (talk) 20:43, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- You have really lost it, STOP destroying the article!--Editor5435 (talk) 20:45, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
3 Revert Rule
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Fractal compression. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.
- 05:18, 23 March 2008
- 17:07, 23 March 2008
- 17:58, 23 March 2008
- 18:24, 23 March 2008
- 20:01, 23 March 2008
- 20:42, 23 March 2008
--Ronz (talk) 20:55, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
You are the guilty one, just STOP!--Editor5435 (talk) 20:56, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
RONZ, you are sick!--Editor5435 (talk) 21:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- Please stop your edit warring
- --Ronz (talk) 21:02, 23 March 2008 (UTC)