This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zalgo (talk | contribs) at 14:06, 1 April 2008 (→Hello!). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:06, 1 April 2008 by Zalgo (talk | contribs) (→Hello!)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
I will usually reply to messages left here on your talk page.
Archives |
Archive 4 • Archive 5 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 6 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Descent 2 - semi protection of D2X-XL chapter rejected
The D2X-XL chapter of the Descent 2 article has been a target for plain vandalism or malevolent changes of its content for over a year. The issue has just started to get heated today, when a few people involved with the Descent community had decided to take this to a new level and mark the chapter as advertisement, restoring the mark whenever I remove it. You may want to take a look at that chapter. If you decide it's an advertisement, I will accept the decision. The people currently at work are however acting out of a deep personal resentment against me, and the Misplaced Pages entry is only a vehicle for their destructivity. FYI: Here is a link to a thread of the biggest English speaking Descent community forum, where the issue is discussed: http://www.descentbb.net/viewforum.php?f=37
Karx11erx (talk) 17:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Karx11erx (talk • contribs) 17:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- You might want to talk to the person who actually declined the protection request, User:Master of Puppets. - Rjd0060 (talk) 17:12, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Ah, ok. I'm pretty much a Misplaced Pages noob, thanks.
Karx11erx (talk) 17:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karx11erx (talk • contribs) 17:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Regarding Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-03-19 National Federation of Republican Assemblies
Regarding the NFRA dispute in the mediation cabal, do I need to be doing anything else to facilitate the dialogue? CorpITGuy (talk) 23:08, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Question
Your response at WP:RFA. Does that mean my talk page is semi-protected or were just saying that one IP was blocked? AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 23:54, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- NM, while writing this I see you posted at RFA. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 23:55, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Freaky
Check the log. How weird is that? Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 22:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Graphology
Pseudo daoist (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) still has troubles understanding what vandalism means: "When the edits are deliberately disruptive, then it is vandalism." 190.51.135.192 (talk) 01:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC) (see his talk page)
- While that statement is true, those edits aren't vandalism, and he fails to assume good faith. - Rjd0060 (talk) 01:13, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Helen Shivers
I see you deleted the article, but you've yet to close the AFD. Cheers, Sarcasticidealist (talk) 09:47, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Re: 21656???!!!
Thanks, dude. I wonder if it was a vandal with some sort of agenda against me...maybe I should point them to WP:21655 is way too smart to be fooled by that sort of trickery. 21655 / ʃign 17:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
SPA
I am only an SPA because Don Murphy has harassed editors in the past when it comes to editing his article. For instance, H left because of this harassment. I explained my goal in editing as a SPA at Talk:Don Murphy/Archive2 as well as at Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Don Murphy and Misplaced Pages talk:Deletion review/Don Murphy. Please try to assume good faith that I am trying to establish Don Murphy's notability without being harassed. RTFA (talk) 17:04, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
WP:ABUSE
I know the policy is to only accept complaints about IPs blocked at least 5 times, but I'm seeing quite a few complaints about IPs with three and four blocks. Should I decline those, or would it be okay to accept them? GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 20:28, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Comment from some guy
Do you see.... I have now got my own account... haha! And I have not vandalised anything.... just shows you that it wasn't me who was doing it!!!!! and I am a member of the Big Brother thing!!! Mikey-is-Lost 13:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikey-is-lost (talk • contribs)
Some GUY!!!!!! I am that person who you kept blocking for no reason what so ever............ remember !!! it wasnt even me who was deleting things.... have you got memory loss or somthin????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikey-is-lost (talk • contribs) 17:32, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- I still have no idea who you are. Want to give me your old username? - Rjd0060 (talk) 17:42, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
I just had an ip address..... how can you not remember me...... my friend like changed that alucard persons comment he left on my talk page.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikey-is-lost (talk • contribs) 18:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
Though it may be because im not using my home computer that I was blocked, I still send my thanks.--Neofcon (talk) 15:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Kitten?
You can has kitten? нмŵוτнτ 15:32, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Big Brother Kids (U.S.)
Look at this. There is an article named Big Brother Kids (U.S.). Nice April Fools joke isn't it. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 11:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello!
Cream (talk) has put a trout your back! The Trout promotes playfulness and hopefully this one has made your day worse. You have no choice but to spread it to other editors! Happy April Fools' Day!
Add this {{subst:AprilFoools}} to their talk page with a friendly fish. 14:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC)