This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rjd0060 (talk | contribs) at 03:03, 6 April 2008 (→Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology: +com). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:03, 6 April 2008 by Rjd0060 (talk | contribs) (→Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology: +com)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
I will usually reply to messages left here on your talk page.
 Archives |
|
Archive 4 • Archive 5 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 6 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Comment from some guy
Do you see.... I have now got my own account... haha! And I have not vandalised anything.... just shows you that it wasn't me who was doing it!!!!! and I am a member of the Big Brother thing!!! Mikey-is-Lost 13:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikey-is-lost (talk • contribs)
Some GUY!!!!!! I am that person who you kept blocking for no reason what so ever............ remember !!! it wasnt even me who was deleting things.... have you got memory loss or somthin????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikey-is-lost (talk • contribs) 17:32, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- I still have no idea who you are. Want to give me your old username? - Rjd0060 (talk) 17:42, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
I just had an ip address..... how can you not remember me...... my friend like changed that alucard persons comment he left on my talk page.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikey-is-lost (talk • contribs) 18:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
Though it may be because im not using my home computer that I was blocked, I still send my thanks.--Neofcon (talk) 15:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Kitten?
You can has kitten? 
нмŵוτнτ 15:32, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Big Brother Kids (U.S.)
Look at this. There is an article named Big Brother Kids (U.S.). Nice April Fools joke isn't it. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 11:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- I figured, someone really loves April Fools :) ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 16:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello!
Cream (talk) has put a trout your back! The Trout promotes playfulness and hopefully this one has made your day worse. You have no choice but to spread it to other editors! Happy April Fools' Day!
Add this {{subst:AprilFoools}} to their talk page with a friendly fish. 14:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Block evasion
A user you blocked for 3RR yesterday, 70.108.82.109, started editing from another IP, 70.108.103.64, before the block was up and is continuing their disruptive editing. I don't like to be a tattletale but sometimes you gotta. —Hello, Control 17:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter - April 2008
| WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter - April 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
- The above newsletter was delivered by an automatic bot because you are registered on the WikiProject Big Brother spamlist. Please feel free to remove yourself if you do not wish to receive these messages anymore.
→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 14:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
User:Birlinn unblock
Could you please be a little more careful? You just unblocked this person so that they could change their name to: the same name (a corporate one) that was blocked in the first place! --Orange Mike | Talk 15:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, excrement eventuates. It turned out well, fortunately. Thanks for trying to help. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:49, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
WP:Lectures on the 6th
Kim is starting the lectures on April 6th around 15:00 UTC (although that is apparently open to discussion). Just a reminder... Xavexgoem (talk) 14:11, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Request
You semi-protected my user page. Thank you. But now, I'd appreciate it if you unprotected. Or should I just undo your edit? Thanks. Me what do u want? Your Hancock Please 00:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
House Calls article finished
I finally have finished the House Calls article. It is detailed and is loaded down with verifiable references. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 20:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- It even has a nice shinny logo as well :) ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 20:46, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
What do you suggest we do to address User:Calton's tagging?
Calton continues, I randomly pulled user out of Calton's many spam warning contributions over the past day and got this one: User_talk:Billseidle - the user has never been blocked, let alone indef blocked. Should I start a separate WP:AN thread to address this issue? What are your recommendations? Calton never responded to your request for an explanation.--Doug. 23:12, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- Have you ever left a note on his talk page, asking him why he does it? . . . (posted at User talk:Doug)
- Most certainly, you will recall this recent post by me at Misplaced Pages:AN#Talk_pages_for_indef_users (which we agreed was slightly off topic) :
- Well, no offense Calton, but I know you commonly tag userpages as spam and then add {{temporary userpage}} to their talk pages. Several admins have addressed this issue with you before, including me, but we apparently have a clear difference of opinion over the proper usage of {{temporary userpage}}. (See User_talk:Calton#Temporary_userpage.3F, User_talk:Calton#Template:temporary_userpage, User_talk:Calton#Tagging_user_pages_of_unblocked_users, User_talk:Calton#Template:temporary_userpage_2). If I notice these I review them. Some of these are in fact indef blocked and don't have an indef block tag, so the {{temporary userpage}} tag is valid. Others have never been blocked, let alone indef blocked. If you look at CAT:TEMP you'll probably find that many, if not most, usertalkpages are due to {{temporary userpage}} on the talk page - though I'm not saying they're all there due to Calton - I have no idea. Alternatively, will give a good starting place if you go through the ones tagged as spam in particular (Calton puts the template in the edit summary so this is pretty easy). --Doug. 23:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- Most certainly, you will recall this recent post by me at Misplaced Pages:AN#Talk_pages_for_indef_users (which we agreed was slightly off topic) :
- There are four notices to Calton there, comprising the concerns of five separate admins, the last one is mine. When Calton replies, it sounds like "Don't complain to me, I just tag them, complain to the admins who are deleting" - that's a paraphrase not a quote. Of course, the complaining parties are the admins. In at least one case, the third one above, Calton appears to convince the admin that he doesn't understand policy and should be deleting these. There is at least one other notice on his page regarding inappropriate use of CSD against user talk pages too. Calton's attitude seems to be that these pages don't belong here so I won't stop tagging them. I'm a new admin and don't really know the best way to handle this, several very experienced admins seem to have given up already. Problem is, from that AN thread we have evidence that some admins have been just cleaning out the queue and maybe not always noticing whether the user was actually indef blocked (of all the tags that I'm aware of that feed CAT:TEMP, {{temporary userpage}} is the only one that is not clearly an indef blocked tag) --Doug. 23:48, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology
I see Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology was deleted, but I was more puzzled to find Hersfold (talk · contribs) removing all incoming links. Hersfold says that he was acting on your request. To be sure, there is little doubt that FASEB is notable, and I'm therefore not convinced that all the links need to be removed. Could you clarify the situation? JFW | T@lk 00:44, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- I agree, this was a really unnecessary action. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology is perfectly valid and important article (also indicated by the number of wikilinks). You should not remove redlinks, and redirects simply because an article was deleted due to copyvio issues. The article was recreated immediately with non-copyvio content. Please take your time to check each case individually! Also, please try to remember all deleted redirects and reinstate them. Thanks, Сасусlе 02:50, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- (cross posted) Sorry to the 3 of you for the confusion. Yes, I deleted the article as a complete copyright violation. The links that were removed by Hersfold, was after I had asked him to do it, as my tool wasn't functioning properly. In this specific case, the links did not have to be removed and it may have in fact been best to leave them, to allow for recreation of the article without copyright violations. My apologies for this error, and thanks for bringing it to my attention. - Rjd0060 (talk) 03:02, 6 April 2008 (UTC)