Talk:SpongeBob SquarePants - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AMK152 (talk | contribs) at 02:33, 14 April 2008 (→Peer Review: update). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 02:33, 14 April 2008 by AMK152 (talk | contribs) (→Peer Review: update)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SpongeBob SquarePants article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Template:WikiProjectSpongeBobSquarePants Template:Wikiproject NickelodeonPlease add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Television High‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Misplaced Pages articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Animation: American

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Top-importance).

Template:Releaseversion

SpongeBob SquarePants received a peer review by Misplaced Pages editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about rants, reviews, or any other forum like topics. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about rants, reviews, or any other forum like topics at the Reference desk.

Talk:SpongeBob SquarePants/Archives

Due to errors in page moving the edit history for this page prior to March 26, 2006 is at .

Peer Review

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.
Per Misplaced Pages:Context and Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
Per Misplaced Pages:Context and Misplaced Pages:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, if January 15, 2006 appeared in the article, link it as January 15, 2006.
There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
- is considered
- might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please ~~strike~~ this comment).
The script has spotted the following contractions: hasn't, won't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Misplaced Pages's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AMK152 02:33, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Comeback?

I'm terribly sorry, but I'm being dead serious. Could we put a title such as "Comeback and Decline". I mean we all know it. It just isn't the same anymore. I, personally, feel that in the beginning the creators knew how to draw well, they just chose a style that was well-liked, but lately (in their "comeback") it's just...different. It's colored differently, it's not that funny anymore, it's oddly predictable, the detail is disappointingly overwhelming, the voices are strange, and its focus went from regular humor to more of a crude humor (unfortunately, because I feel ashamed when I watch something with crude humor). Just a suggestion. 24.3.239.76 (talk) 00:09, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

That's what we call an opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.10.88.69 (talk) 23:21, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

71.10.88.69 is right. You may think about it as one way while others don't. If the ratings dropped at a certain time and can be proven, then yes, that is a decline, but only due to the ratings unless additional details can be sourced. -AMK152 01:51, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

No mention of Pest of the West?

It isn't mentioned anywhere. Kimera Kat (talk) 01:08, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Categories: