Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 216.167.133.159 (talk) at 18:46, 14 April 2008 (→Merger of City and District Articles). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

United States: Texas Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States ??? This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Texas.

Cities Start‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

Merger of City and District Articles

Oppose. Under Texas law, school district boundaries do not necessarily coincide with city or county boundaries. Also, the two are separate legal entities with separately elected officials. 160.147.240.6 (talk) 19:59, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Being separate legal entities with separately elected officials isn't a reason not to merge. The merge was proposed as this is a very small town with a very small school district. The district article will likely remain a stub and if AfDed would end up being merged anyway. Collectonian (talk) 20:23, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Response To Previous Inflamatory Post That Was Removed Quickly, By Collectonian, While The Inflamatory Post Was Allowed To Stand For More Than A Week (Equal Time Is Deserved)

I apologize to anyone that this might offend but, as the baseless and inflamatory post to which I am responding was clearly allowwed to stand for almost two weeks, why should my post (which clearly cites supporting court certified documentation) be removed within three minutes of appearing? Therefore, I'll try this again in this fantasy place that obviously wants you to "say something without saying anything" and to "prove it without presenting any evidence":

All of David Rushing's post (above) would make some kind of sense if only I were the radio station owner - which I'm not.

Try it this way then, since you would prefer to see homoginized facts and form your own opinions: Take a look at the CERTIFIED COURT DOCUMENTS at http://www.shamrockedc.com/you_decide.htm and then form your own opinion.

If, after reading the documents cited there, you still have any doubts, you need more help than I can offer in interpretation of facts. Of course, the next thing you will be reading here is a post from David Rushing insisting that the court records presented there are falsified. I would suggest that you follow up by contacting the court reporter whose contact information and certification is at the bottom of each page for verification purposes.

If you consider this to be a "personal attack" then, I don't know what I can do for you because that is NOT what is intended. Where I'm from "facts are facts" and a person cannot ignore facts simply because "this viewpoint disagrees with the way I want things to be". I'm sorry. The facts are the facts and, some people will feel that these facts deserve to stand as did the previously posted accusations that were presented without any substantiating evidence. hy is it that unsubstantiated claims are always welcome here but, when an opposing view is posted with substantiating evidence, it must be quickly deleted? (I'm waiting to be blocked again because of this question that I fel is very valid. Answers to such questions do not seem to be very abunant here as the questions are generally removed post haste and the account blocked instead of the question being answered.)216.167.133.159 (talk) 18:46, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

• Unassessed United States articles
• Unknown-importance United States articles
• Unassessed United States articles of Unknown-importance
• Unassessed Texas articles
• Unknown-importance Texas articles
• WikiProject Texas articles
• WikiProject United States articles
• Start-Class WikiProject Cities articles
• All WikiProject Cities pages