This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wizardman (talk | contribs) at 20:26, 20 April 2008 (→Situation on RfA/RfB : More functional or politicized?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:26, 20 April 2008 by Wizardman (talk | contribs) (→Situation on RfA/RfB : More functional or politicized?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Situation on RfA/RfB : More functional or politicized?
A common criticism for Requests for Adminship over the years is that the process is overtly politicized; some bring their advocacy on the table, others personal vendettas, and at times things can get pretty nasty on candidates. Over the past year, do you think the process has improved (as it has become more civil and functional), or there is more mudslinging than ever?
Improved
Worse
- Far less civil, more of a popularity contest, too easy to game. Mr.Z-man 20:01, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, it's gotten really bad on this front. Wizardman 20:26, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Still the same
Other
- This question assumes that you thought it was bad in the first place. -- Naerii 20:01, 20 April 2008 (UTC)