This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wizardman (talk | contribs) at 20:32, 20 April 2008 (→Is rollback rights considered a success?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:32, 20 April 2008 by Wizardman (talk | contribs) (→Is rollback rights considered a success?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Is rollback rights considered a success?
Initially there wasn't much community traction to go ahead with it, but it did anyway. Do you consider it to be a success or failure now? Any lesson we can take from it in future policy-making regarding UserRights?
Yes, it is a success
- It works better than I thought it would. J Milburn (talk) 20:08, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- I think I initially opposed it when it was first brought up a couple years ago. But it was set up perfectly, and it's worked great. Grandmasterka 20:10, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- It hasn't turned into a bureacracy, it hasn't seen more than a few isolated incidents of misuse, and it hasn't turned into a clique of trusted users. Mr.Z-man 20:15, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- A complete success, excepting a few drama queens who think Twinkle is the same. As I said above, we should have RfAs like RfR. Majorly (talk) 20:24, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- Successful, but for the 5 rollbacks a minute limit which is too few. EJF (talk) 20:30, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- Has been very good. Wizardman 20:32, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
No, it is a failure
- -- Naerii 20:04, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- Twinkle offers a much better service with no prior registration. ...... Dendodge.Talk 20:15, 20 April 2008 (UTC)