This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RandomXYZb (talk | contribs) at 20:53, 21 April 2008 (→Block notice: r). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:53, 21 April 2008 by RandomXYZb (talk | contribs) (→Block notice: r)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Dogs?Wha. MfD nomination of Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:SandboxMisplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Sandbox, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ziggy Sawdust 19:01, 21 April 2008 (UTC) Speedy deletionRegarding the page Vincent Da Sylva, which you tagged for speedy deletion on the basis of an article about a real person, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content that does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject, I wanted you to know that I have removed the speedy deletion tag. This page does not qualify for speedy deletion under that criterion because the article indicates that he is an international pro basketball player, which is an assertion of notability. If you still want the page to be deleted, please re-tag it under a CSD criterion that applies, consider redirecting the article, or use the proposed deletion or the articles for deletion processes. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 19:51, 21 April 2008 (UTC) Slow downYou've nominated an awful lot of articles for deletion recently, some of which weren't very appropriate candidates for deletion. I appreciate that Twinkle speeds things up quite a bit, but might I suggest you slow down and consider your nominations more carefully for a while? Thanks. Stifle (talk) 19:56, 21 April 2008 (UTC) Some kind of joke?{{db-nocontext}} on a fully-formed stub that links to the major issues? What are you, a bot? Show some discrimination or they'll take Twinkle away. --Relata refero (disp.) 20:12, 21 April 2008 (UTC) WP:AIVI've removed Jsmithith and Pimpmansion - neither of the users have been warned. If people are creating nonsense pages, please use {{uw-create1}}, {{uw-create2}} and so on before reporting them to AIV for blocking - with no warning whatsoever a block would be unwarranted. Thanks. GB 20:38, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
FrankwilkinsHave you ever considered that perhaps the reason he's re-creating the article is because your attempts to destroy without discussion are totally out of line? Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 20:40, 21 April 2008 (UTC) Block noticeYou have been blocked for 30 minutes for disruptive editing using Twinkle. Please explain your edits and respond to the above messages, and when the block expires, please slow down and think about your edits. If you do not, your access to Twinkle may be closed down. Stifle (talk) 20:45, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
|