This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 82.131.210.162 (talk) at 14:27, 23 May 2008 (→Calling a balck spade a kettle?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:27, 23 May 2008 by 82.131.210.162 (talk) (→Calling a balck spade a kettle?: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
Template:Korean requires | |
Cleanup
Grammar could be tightened just a bit. Expansion would be nice, too... - Aerobird 02:38, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- I've cleaned it up considerably. Expansion would still be nice. :-) - Aerobird 03:37, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- How should I further expand it? Thanks (Wikimachine 05:15, 18 May 2006 (UTC))
Grammar
- The aircraft can carry up to two pilots, and the high amount canopy and the tandem seating allow the pilots superior visibility, vital to successfuly locking onto enemy targets.
What exactly is "high amount canopy" supposed to mean? High-mounted canopy? Even that doesn't mean much. I want to clean this up, but as I am unsure of the origianl intent, I am waiting. --BillCJ 19:14, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- It was supposed to be high-mounted canopy. Please go ahead & copy edit as much as you want. (Wikimachine 22:34, 1 October 2006 (UTC))
OK, thanks. That's what I thought it was supposed to be, but wasn't certain. --BillCJ 23:11, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Recent edits
Could I ask anyone why some numbers on the statistics were deleted? (Wikimachine 23:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC))
- Are you referring to this? A range given in feet smells of rat to me, and I wasn't too sure about a climb rate of 27,000 feet per minute...perhaps intial climb rate, but what's the sustained value? - Aerobird 01:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- No idea. I gathered data from 2 ~ 3 sites at the external links (& possibly references) that gave list of stats. (Wikimachine 02:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC))
Calling a balck spade a kettle?
Why do we call this plane a trainer? It has full-blown radar and the same type of single jet engine is found in the swedish Jas-39 Gripen fighter jet, the airframe size is also similar. The use of afterburner makes it a high-cost airplane, which is against any trainer use logic. This plane either makes no sense or it is actually a light fighter-bomber with a trainer excuse! 82.131.210.162 (talk) 14:27, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Category: