This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pastordavid (talk | contribs) at 13:11, 5 June 2008 (del). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:11, 5 June 2008 by Pastordavid (talk | contribs) (del)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)St. Luke Lutheran Church
- St. Luke Lutheran Church (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable church. Katr67 (talk) 19:36, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. —Katr67 (talk) 19:46, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep The article needs to be rewritten, not deleted. Ecoleetage (talk) 02:18, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, does not appear to have any claim of notability. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 03:32, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:ORG. Most individual local churches are non-notable. The church has apparently been mentioned on occasion in independent reliable sources but does not appear to have received significant coverage from them. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:18, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Most individual churches aren't notable. AndyJones (talk) 12:24, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Individual congregations are neither inherently notable nor inherently non-notable. This particular one has no specific claijms to notability: (a) it is not particularly old, (b) it has not had a storied history, (c) it is large, but not in an extra-ordinary way, and (d) it has not been served by any particularly notable pastors. I doubt that this would be notable enough for a mention in the Portland article; there is a small mention in the neighborhood article, which seems appropriate. God is gracious -- Misplaced Pages demands notability. Pastordavid (talk) 13:11, 5 June 2008 (UTC)