This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) at 15:06, 9 June 2008 (Archiving 5 thread(s) (older than 5d) to User talk:Thatcher/Archive20. ). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 15:06, 9 June 2008 by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 5 thread(s) (older than 5d) to User talk:Thatcher/Archive20. )(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| Noticeboards | |
|---|---|
| Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
| General | |
| Articles, content | |
| Page handling | |
| User conduct | |
| Other | |
| Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards | |
| My admin actions |
|---|
| Contribs • Blocks • Protects • Deletions |
| Admin links |
| Noticeboard • Incidents • AIV • 3RR |
| CSD • Prod • AfD |
| Backlog • Images • RFU • Autoblocks |
| Articles |
| GAN • Criteria • Process • Content RFC |
| Checkuser and Oversight |
| Checkuser • Oversight log • Suppression log |
| SUL tool • User rights • All range blocks |
| Tor check • Geolocate • Geolocate • Honey pot |
| RBL lookup • DNSstuff • Abusive Hosts |
| Wikistalk tool • Single IP lookup |
| Other wikis |
| Quote • Meta • Commons |
| Template links |
| Piggybank • Tor list • Links |
| Other |
| Temp • Sandbox1 • Sandbox3 • Sandbox4 |
| • Wikistalk • Wannabe Kate's tool • Prefix index |
| • Contribs by page • Watchlist count |
| Talk archives |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 |
Homeopathy /Evidence
Is there some way to see a scrubbed version of Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Homeopathy/Evidence as a normal user? Should I be asking someone else about this? Thanks, Gnixon (talk) 17:56, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Wow, I didn't see that when it happened. Scrubbing it would have to be a manual job and I don't even know what was allegedly revealed. You might the clerk listed as handling the case if he has the time to make a scrubbed version; otherwise ask arbcom or Dmcdevit I guess. Thatcher 18:19, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, I hadn't noticed there's a listed clerk. Gnixon (talk) 20:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Fuss
Ok, I'll be a good boy. Lampman 23:30, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Recarnation of Azukimonaka?
Hi, Thatcher. Can you check this seemingly sock IP(s) of Azukimonaka (talk · contribs)/KoreanShoriSenyou (talk · contribs) and his multiple gangs? Recently, manhwa article has been (typically) vandalised by very persistent ocn.ne.jp IP user(s) over the same matter just like Azukimonaka did on the manhwa related articles. The ocn anon(s) appeared to blank the same thing at Blade of the Phantom Master which he also did. Thanks. *61.119.138.171 (talk · contribs)
- 211.129.140.247 (talk · contribs)
- 220.104.47.22 (talk · contribs)
- 221.184.41.234 (talk · contribs)
- 124.86.248.112 (talk · contribs)
--Appletrees (talk) 01:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Even if the anon in question is not related to Azukimonaka, another obvious sock Jazz81089 (talk · contribs) seems to be related to him/her. per the long break from 8 months and the timing. Can you look at the sock? Thanks.-Appletrees (talk) 21:00, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking the case, but I can't prevent the disruptive removals and POV pushing by this obviously Azukimonaka-ish ocn. anon and sock account Jazz81089. Besides, if Jazz81089 uses ocn.ne.jp IP, he clearly violated 3RR rules. I talked to the anon/jazz to participate in an open discussion countless times, and even requested RFC, but his disruption does not stop. So typical WP:DR is no use because he has not responded to any of them. In such case, what else can I do? File this at WP:SSP or WP:ANI or just keep reverting his blanking after my limit of 3 time reverts is over? --Appletrees (talk) 03:20, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for protecting the page, but the last edit was by Jazz81089 (talk · contribs). Until he edited, the lead section clearly said about Korean Manhwa and the current protected page only supports the disruptive anon/Jazz81089 (talk · contribs). The work is created by Korean artists and my version is a compromised version, but he does not listen to. Can you revert his edit? Thanks. --Appletrees (talk) 03:27, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- I only semi-protected the article. Anonymous IP editors may not make changes but registered users such as yourself can. Thatcher 11:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
User talk:Amoruso
This user is challenging his 2-month block for sockpuppetry, based on a "likely" finding you gave at Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Amoruso. Can you comment about what you found? He seems to think that the checkuser result identified him as having the same ISP... I don't believe that but it's probably best if you comment. Mangojuice 20:42, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Left comment. Thatcher 02:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
blocking IP range
Greatings, some of the registered user from bosnian Misplaced Pages have complained about blocking their IP addresses see here. Can you resolve the problem please, thanks in advance.--CERminator (talk) 09:01, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- There have been a lot of inappropriate edits there. Certainly I would not want to think that any of the bosnian wikipedia editors were responsble and wanted to edit anonymously to avoid being connected to their home accounts. Anonymous editors are blocked but editors with accounts on enwiki can still edit. I suggest they either create a unified login so they would have a single account on all wikis, or they ask the unblock-L mailing list to create an enwiki account for them. Either way, they would then have an account here and could edit from that range with no problems. Thatcher 11:48, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your reply. We already solved the mistery. Affected user(s) don't have unified account, and I'm afraid she/he cannot do that because affected username is already occupied on en.wikipedia. Anyway, thanks a lot. Best regards--CERminator (talk) 12:54, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Sockpuppet
Hi. I’m directing this message to you because you were the one who confirmed the Wellwater Conspiracy CheckUser request. This is a very difficult case because the guy has been creating numerous accounts to evade blocks. On no.wikipedia, he has come clean, and the community has decided to give him a second chance, but here they all got blocked. Of course he has created another account here, no surprise, User:Alive Would? Sun (confirmed on no:User:Superunknown). I just thought I’d let you know, so you can decide what to do with it. — H92 (t · c · no) 21:31, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. I don't usually make blocking decisions on my own technical findings, the place to ask would be the admins noticeboard. Thatcher 21:34, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for a quick reply. Because the user has been annoying me and loads of other users on no.wikipedia I just asked for a second opinion. I don’t know if the community wants to give him a second chance. I’ll write something on WP:ANI. Thanks! ;) — H92 (t · c · no) 21:42, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Checkuser activity
Would you be able to comment at Misplaced Pages talk:CheckUser#Activity levels of individual Checkusers? Thanks. I also mentioned this (and you by name) at this ANI thread. Apologies if my impressions were mistaken. I think I should have asked you and Raul at your talk pages before mentioning your names at the ANI thread. This is one reason why I would like to see activity logs, as that would confirm impressions and correct mistaken impressions. Carcharoth (talk) 11:51, 8 June 2008 (UTC)