Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Plyhmrp (talk | contribs) at 20:29, 23 June 2008 (→My RFA (plyhmrp)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives

Pre-March March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008

If you leave a message here, I'll reply here. The same applies to you. If I leave a message on your page, I keep it watchlisted and I'll see when you reply.

BLP violations

I have deleted the content you added to User:Enigmaman/Sandbox that was re-deleted per BLP1E, please do not recreate it in the future. MBisanz 07:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

What was the violation? Non Curat Lex (talk) 08:42, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Has to do with this and this. Enigma 14:27, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

What strangeness. Why did you repost it in your sandbox? Non Curat Lex (talk) 23:08, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I didn't realize it was going to be a problem. The talk of the deleted page was where a user was working on a copy to improve it to Misplaced Pages standards. It got deleted due to the "talk page of a deleted page" clause. I thought it was a worthy endeavor to improve the article, as there's no question that the subject has received coverage from reliable sources, thus meeting WP:N. Enigma 23:11, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Award Center Newsletter

Misplaced Pages:AWC/newsletter/archive/4 - Newsletter Bot Talk 02:07, 21 June 2008 (UTC) If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name here.

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		For your improvements to Brian Stewart, I, Sharkface217, hereby award you this barnstar. Thanks for all the hard work with ACCOTF. --Sharkface/C 02:22, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Keep an eye on this one...

Hey E_man. Do me a favour. Keep an eye on uber-edit-warrior User:Johan Rachmaninov. It doesn't matter how many people edit the pages he wants to own he reverts them. I discussed his case with Pat the other day but I decided to AGF him for dozens of 3RR vios. I am not going to AGF anymore. I you catch him reverting anything from anybody on a page that he's reverted on, even once, in the past 2 days... let me know and I'll put him on the chop. Libs (talk) 16:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

WP:LA

Hi - Unless I do something special, 52pickup will be readded to the active list until his (her) last 30 edits are within the last 3 months (mid July I suppose). I suppose it's pretty clear when editors stop editing completely that they're gone but the active/semi-active/inactive algorithm doesn't really take this into account. I think I'd like to keep "inactive" as "no edits in the last three months", but I suppose there could be a "no edit in the last " criteria for semi-active. Any suggestions for n? -- Rick Block (talk) 02:15, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

I agree that there should be a criterion added that would shift an admin from active to semi-active once they haven't edited for n days. I'm no expert, but I would say 30 days for sure, possibly less. Enigma 02:53, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Independent Democratic Confederation of Nepalese Trade Union

I'll take a look and see if I can find any more sources. The article does look a lot better than it did before you cleaned it up nicely. Useight (talk) 18:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

My RFA (plyhmrp)

Why did you take off my RFA and are you a admin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plyhmrp (talk • contribs) 20:17, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm not an admin and I closed it due to WP:NOTNOW and WP:SNOW. It had no chance of passing. I would elaborate, but I'd rather not. Enigma 20:19, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

First off tell me why you edited my userpage in the guidelines section and how can you judge if it will pass. Another policy WP:SNOW is not a policy it says so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plyhmrp (talk • contribs) 20:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

I removed personal attacks from your talk page. They are inappropriate. Please read WP:SNOW and WP:NOTNOW. I am positive your RfA would not have passed. I would not have closed it had I had any doubt. Enigma 20:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

First those "attacks" are on MY userpage so I can do what I wish. Don't take down RFA'S it's not your job.Plyhmrp (talk) 20:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)plyhmrp