This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 190.51.143.131 (talk) at 21:54, 25 June 2008 (Undid revision 221741350 by ClueBot (talk)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:54, 25 June 2008 by 190.51.143.131 (talk) (Undid revision 221741350 by ClueBot (talk))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff){{Talk:Main Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. ·Add§hore· /Cont 10:01, 10 May 2008 (UTC) <><><><><>Ñ{}()§ ªTemplate:Título Template:Cita
ARRIBA ENSENADA PUTITOS!!!!!!!!!
PENE
8==========D --190.160.236.82 03:54 22 jun 2008 (UTC)
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! Imagen:Inciclopedia Vandalizada.JPG Categoría:Autorreferente
OIGAN USTEDES HIJOS DE PUTA JÓDANSEJÓDANSEJÓDANSEJÓDANSEJÓDANSEJÓDANSEJÓDANSEJÓDANSE
]
**ARTICULO** vEAMOS SI USAS fIREfOX PAImagen:Premio_falso.gifRA QUE NO PUEDASEDITAR. MWAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
juegen tibia maracos qliaos, MU es una mierda conchesumadre y la inciclopedia también giles qliaos frikis conchesumadres
- ______________*putos trolls de m erdad hijos de putaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
- ______________*
O_00.0.0.'00.0.O' AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAME ENCANTÓ LA VERIJA DE TU MADRE CUANDO ESTABA CHAQUETEÁNDOLA LUEGO LA COGÍ.AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
El Tibia es una mierda weonNN!! el MU es tu padre weon, yo soy tu papi. MU MU MU !
ESE ES UN IDIIOTA MALNACIDO QUE SÓLO PIENSA EN SEXO ORALTemplate:לשכתב
ונדליזם הינה תורת זן עתיקת יומין שהועברה בטקס פולחן מהמין השימפנזי לבני האדם. כיום הממונים על על התורה העתיקה הם קבוצת חייזרים שמבצעים ניסויים בבני אדם תמימים המכונים גם "מורים". החייזרים ציוו Template:לשכתב
ונדליזם הינה תורת זן עתיקת יומין שהועברה בטקס פולחן מהמין השימפנזי לבני האדם. כיום הממונים על על התורה העתיקה הם קבוצת חייזרים שמבצעים ניסויים בבני אדם תמימים המכונים גם "מורים". החייזרים ציוTemplate:לשכתב
ונדליזם הינה תורת זן עתיקת יומין שהועברה בטקס פולחן מהמין השימפנזי לבני האTemplate:לשכתב
ונדליזם הינה תורת זן עתיקת יומין שהועברה בטקס פולחן מהמין השימפנזי לבני האדם. כיום הממונים על על התורה העתיקה הם קבוצת חייזרים שמבצעים ניסויים בבני אדם תמימים המכונים גם "מורים". החייזרים ציוו על נתיניהם המורים להעביר את עקרונות התורה לתלמידים חסרי הישע, אך ההשערה היא שהמורים התמרדו והענישו כל תלמיד שקיבל את התורה.
לפני כ-169 שנים העלה הגאון עובדיה יוסף השערה חדשה: המורים לא הבינו את החייזרים היטב (המורים ידועים ב"חוכמתם") ופירשו את ה"תורה" הסודית כספר התורה (התנ"ך). מאז המורים מלמדים תנ"ך, אך הגאון עובדיה מבקש להבהיר: כשתתממש הנבואה העתיקה יתחילו המורים ללמד את עקרונות הונדליזם במקום את התנ"ך.
המתנגד הראשון להשערתו של הגאון עובדיה היה הרב כדורי שליט"א! - אשר מיוחסת לו התורה המכונה: "תורת ההיווצרות העל-ביונית הנובעת מהאולטרא-גלקטי-שליט"א!". כדורי חשב שהוא ותורתו ישלטו בעולם לכן הוסיף בסוף שמה (וגם בסוף שמו) את המילה שליטה! בשגיעות כתיב: שליט"א!.
הרב כדורי שליט"א! מביע בתורתו המופלצת את הרעיון הפשוט: הנבואה התממשה. הוא סבור כי בספר התנ"ך יש עדויות לתורת הונדליזם העתיקה. הוא חוזר ומשבח את אהוד בן גרא אשר ניפץ בעזרת נבוט את המזבח הפלישטי. הוא מזכיר שוב ושוב את שמשון הגיבור הבלתי נלאה אשר מוטט את היכל הפלישטים. במקרה האחרון רואה הרב כדורי שליט"א! נבואה לתלמידי העולם שימוטטו את בתי הספר שלהם. דם. כיום הממונים על על התורה העתיקה הם קבוצת חייזרים שמבצעים ניסויים בבני אדם תמימים המכונים גם "מורים". החייזרים ציוו על נתיניהם המורים להעביר את עקרונות התורה לתלמידים חסרי הישע, אך ההשערה היא שהמורים התמרדו והענישו כל תלמיד שקיבל את התורה.
לפני כ-169 שנים העלה הגאון עובדיה יוסף השערה חדשה: המורים לא הבינו את החייזרים היטב (המורים ידועים ב"חוכמתם") ופירשו את ה"תורה" הסודית כספר התורה (התנ"ך). מאז המורים מלמדים תנ"ך, אך הגאון עובדיה מבקש להבהיר: כשתתממש הנבואה העתיקה יתחילו המורים ללמד את עקרונות הונדליזם במקום את התנ"ך.
המתנגד הראשון להשערתו של הגאון עובדיה היה הרב כדורי שליט"א! - אשר מיוחסת לו התורה המכונה: "תורת ההיווצרות העל-ביונית הנובעת מהאולטרא-גלקטי-שליט"א!". כדורי חשב שהוא ותורתו ישלטו בעולם לכן הוסיף בסוף שמה (וגם בסוף שמו) את המילה שליטה! בשגיעות כתיב: שליט"א!.
הרב כדורי שליט"א! מביע בתורתו המופלצת את הרעיון הפשוט: הנבואה התממשה. הוא סבור כי בספר התנ"ך יש עדויות לתורת הונדליזם העתיקה. הוא חוזר ומשבח את אהוד בן גרא אשר ניפץ בעזרת נבוט את המזבח הפלישטי. הוא מזכיר שוב ושוב את שמשון הגיבור הבלתי נלאה אשר מוטט את היכל הפלישטים. במקרה האחרון רואה הרב כדורי שליט"א! נבואה לתלמידי העולם שימוטטו את בתי הספר שלהם. ו על נתיניהם המורים להעביר את עקרונות התורה לתלמידים חסרי הישע, אך ההשערה היא שהמורים התמרדו והענישו כל תלמיד שקיבל את התורה.
לפני כ-169 שנים העלה הגאון עובדיה יוסף השערה חדשה: המורים לא הבינו את החייזרים היטב (המורים ידועים ב"חוכמתם") ופירשו את ה"תורה" הסודית כספר התורה (התנ"ך). מאז המורים מלמדים תנ"ך, אך הגאון עובדיה מבקש להבהיר: כשתתממש הנבואה העתיקה יתחילו המורים ללמד את עקרונות הונדליזם במקום את התנ"ך.
המתנגד הראשון להשערתו של הגאון עובדיה היה הרב כדורי שליט"א! - אשר מיוחסת לו התורה המכונה: "תורת ההיווצרות העל-ביונית הנובעת מהאולטרא-גלקטי-שליט"א!". כדורי חשב שהוא ותורתו ישלטו בעולם לכן הוסיף בסוף שמה (וגם בסוף שמו) את המילה שליטה! בשגיעות כתיב: שליט"א!.
הרב כדורי שליט"א! מביע בתורתו המופלצת את הרעיון הפשוט: הנבואה התממשה. הוא סבור כי בספר התנ"ך יש עדויות לתורת הונדליזם העתיקה. הוא חוזר ומשבח את אהוד בן גרא אשר ניפץ בעזרת נבוט את המזבח הפלישטי. הוא מזכיר שוב ושוב את שמשון הגיבור הבלתי נלאה אשר מוטט את היכל הפלישטים. במקרה האחרון רואה הרב כדורי שליט"א! נבואה לתלמידי העולם שימוטטו את בתי הספר שלהם. על נתיניהם המורים להעביר את עקרונות התורה לתלמידים חסרי הישע, אך ההשערה היא שהמורים התמרדו והענישו כל תלמיד שקיבל את התורה.
לפני כ-169 שנים העלה הגאון עובדיה יוסף השערה חדשה: המורים לא הבינו את החייזרים היטב (המורים ידועים ב"חוכמתם") ופירשו את ה"תורה" הסודית כספר התורה (התנ"ך). מאז המורים מלמדים תנ"ך, אך הגאון עובדיה מבקש להבהיר: כשתתממש הנבואה העתיקה יתחילו המורים ללמד את עקרונות הונדליזם במקום את התנ"ך.
המתנגד הראשון להשערתו של הגאון עובדיה היה הרב כדורי שליט"א! - אשר מיוחסת לו התורה המכונה: "תורת ההיווצרות העל-ביונית הנובעת מהאולטרא-גלקטי-שליט"א!". כדורי חשב שהוא ותורתו ישלטו בעולם לכן הוסיף בסוף שמה (וגם בסוף שמו) את המילה שליטה! בשגיעות כתיב: שליט"א!.
הרב כדורי שליט"א! מביע בתורתו המופלצת את הרעיון הפשוט: הנבואה התממשה. הוא סבור כי בספר התנ"ך יש עדויות לתורת הונדליזם העתיקה. הוא חוזר ומשבח את אהוד בן גרא אשר ניפץ בעזרת נבוט את המזבח הפלישטי. הוא מזכיר שוב ושוב את שמשון הגיבור הבלתי נלאה אשר מוטט את היכל הפלישטים. במקרה האחרון רואה הרב כדורי שליט"א! נבואה לתלמידי העולם שימוטטו את בתי הספר שלהם.
GILES QLIAOS CONCHEDESUMADRES, BUSQUEN TRABAJO Y DEDIQUENSE A OTRA WEA, QUE ANDAN ESCRBIEIDN WEAS!??? LO VEO EN LA CALLE Y ME LOS VIOLO PERRO QLIAOS HIJOS DE LA COMEMOCO!
CAMILA ES UNA PIRUJA
TE AMO MARIZOL KEDATE CONMIGO
GINO COCHINO SACATE EL TAJO MARICON CULIAO FEO!!!!
PENE !!!! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO!!!L!!!!11!!!LLLOLOLOLOLO!L!!!!!
uso firefox y lo pude Imagen:Premio_falso.gifeditar fracasados, MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!
GAYBRIEL CULIAO MATATE FLETO E MIERDAAAA!!!
PUTA LA WEA NO SE PUEDE EDITAR NUNCA ESTA PÁGINA TA MAS VANDALIZA QE MI PAGINA DE USUARIO
no se meta a este enlace porfavor
LOL!=
LOL!? QUE ES LOL? XD
LOL= LOT
OF LAUGHS
UN CHINGO DE RISAS XD !!!!
pd: al retrasado mental que esta destruyendo esta parte de inciclopediaImagen:Yusuke.jpg le pido de la manera mas amable posible, se suicide o se meta un tubo oxidado por el culo!!! hijo de perra
Pinches pendejos no tienen otra cosa que hacer que andar escrbinedo mierda, coño >.<U qu8e ponen purasm mierda...
Giliflauta de caca Imagen:Yusuke.jpg Imagen:Tio1.jpg Imagen:Yusuke.jpg PERROS QLIAOS FLETOS, ME TIENEN CHATO CON SU WEA DE TIO1.jPG madres!!! les gusta la callampa de tio1.jgp
hijos de putaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Chin*&%*$ a su madre
Ustedes son unos PUTIIIIIIILLLOSSSSSSSSSSSSSS, LOS HATE YOU! AAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRGGG Imagen:Premio_falso.gif MUERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAN!!! COMO SEEE ATREVEEEN A BLASFEMIIIAR A UNO DE LOS MAS GRANDES SERES HUMANOS DEL MUNDO
joJJJJJJJJJJOooooooooooooooouUUUUUUUUUUUtttttttttOOOOOSSSSSSSS!!!
¿QUIERES PASIÓN? LLÁMAME PARA QUE TÚ Y YO TENGAMOS PASIÓN A MÁS NO PODER. MI TELÉFONO ES 555-34-36-87. ¡¡¡LLÁMAME URGIDO!!!
SOYS MAS FEOS QUE LOS COJONES DE MICHAEL JACKSONImagen:Yusuke.jpg (jejejeje... a que soy gracioso jejejeje soy el mas gracioso del mundo... deberia suicidarme...)
==HIJOS DE PERRA TODOS LOS MARAKOS WECOS PENE==
ES COMO SI YO AHORA ME CAGARA EN SUS PUTAS MADRES
Tio1.jpg siempre visita www.vandal.net :) gilipollas de mierda que puto problema tienen con el emos sucios mamones de mierda
Deje su mensaje aquí
TONTO IMBECIL DE LA PUTA MARAKAImagen:Yusuke.jpg
Imagen:Yusuke.jpg Imagen:Yusuke.jpg Imagen:Yusuke.jpg Imagen:Yusuke.jpg Imagen:Yusuke.jpg Imagen:Yusuke.jpg Imagen:Yusuke.jpg Imagen:Yusuke.jpg Imagen:Yusuke.jpg Imagen:Yusuke.jpg Imagen:Yusuke.jpg Imagen:Yusuke.jpg Imagen:Yusuke.jpgImagen:Yusuke.jpg
Saludos a Juan ^o^ --Alguien 21:39 22 mar 2007 (UTC)Imagen:Yusuke.jpg me caga la pinche pagina myspafddsaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaffffffffce LOS MYSPACE SON UNA MIERDAAA!! QUE PENDEJOImagen:Premio_falso.gif EL QUE INVENTO ESA CAGADA LLAMADA "myspace" LA PEOR MIERDA DE TOOOOOOODO EL MUNDO ESA MIERDA LLAMADA MYSPACE SOLO LLENA DE BASURA A TODO EL PINCHE MUNDO CAGADO MUAWHAHAHAHA kpas hijos de puta krreeenn que vandalear es diverdidos, por k putamadre no sevandalean la raja giles culiaos ñeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeñeñeñeñeñeñeeñeeeñeeeeeeeeeeeeeñeñeeñeeññeee waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa pookemones y la concha de sus putasmadres
ÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑ
ÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑ ÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑ ÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑImagen:Yusuke.jpgÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑ ÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑ ÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑ ÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑ� ÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑ puta que hay que estar muy dedicado al vandalismo innecesario para estar haciendo semejante hueá... ESTO QUERIDOS LECTORES DE INCICLOPEDIA ES LA MUESTRA DE UN NIÑO RETRASADO MENTAL, ENTRE 13-15 AÑOS, PATETICO, SIN VIDA SOCIAL, ME CAGUE AL DECIR LO ULTIMO ROFLMAO
HASTA NUNCA BABOSOS ME CANSE DE ESTE VANDALISMO Y TODA LA #¿)&% VULGARIDAD QUE HAY AQUI, NO PUEDEN SER UN MALDITO CARAJO HIJOS DE #$%$ CULTOS? ME VOY A PEGAR UN TIRO AHORA MISMO, FRENTE AL TECLADO. 1 - 2 - 3 ,MSADÑ <MFGSD<GDSSATYGFUYDSGFUHB SDHGVBV GHVG VVGVGHFVDGHFV
Podemos apreciar por la inmadurez de sus trazos que en el mundo real es un patetico antisocial, cullos padres no lo dejan salir ni a la esquinanojkjokñ jkp,ñinjlkñ-mkl´ñ-mkl{l´-lyh soy puta.
Chupenme el pito todos!!
CHUPENME EL PITO TODOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A LA VERGAAA!!!!!!!!!! ==
Mierda hijode pe... viva chuck norris
mierda viva chuck norris caca, neopets es un mierda viva chile mierda, lsjaodwhejhihfreidchgisu chuck norris oooooooo sin television y sin cervesa homero pierde la cabeza, vandalismo, star wars, pokemon, drake es un hijo de perra aaaa teletuvis violadores de cabras ohdofsdhfihsdighreiyhgvurfyhdsfds mietda "$&(()(==?)&·$$·" chinga su madre, hijo de perraohnfioedhciherui
Imagen: Chuck-Norris-Photograph.jpg CHUK NORRIS NOS VIOLARA A TODOS!!! Imagen:Yusuke.jpg
mierdaun huevo 23:40 27 abr 2008 (UTC)
(no conseguirán borrarlo)
no señores esto no lo van a borrar hasta que ese tio con extension de jpg me devuelva mi dinero ¿QUE ES MEJOR EL PICHI O LA CACA?
- LA CACA POH WEÓN
Template:Comentario JAJAJA QUE NO TE VAMOS A BORRAR QUEEE PEDAZO DE CACA JAJAJA!! QUE CREES QUE NADIE PUEDE EDITAR ESTO O QUE????
cs:Vandalismus de:Vandalismus en:Vandalism fi:Vandalismi he:ונדליזם id:Vandalisme it:Vandalismo ja:ヴァンダリズム pt:Vandalismo ru:Вандализм
Please stop reposting personal attacks to User talk:66.102.80.212. These were placed by an abusive user as part of a content dispute; your continual reposting of this nonsense is vandalism. --66.102.80.212 (talk) 11:35, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- Don't delete warnings without comment, otherwise people keep on putting them back. Cst17 (talk) 11:40, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Friendly reminder about talk page messages
Hello. As a recent editor to User talk:66.102.80.212, I wanted to leave you a friendly reminder that as per WP:USER, editors may remove messages at will from their own talk page. While we may prefer that messages be archived, policy does not prohibit users -including anonymous users- from deleting comments from their own talk pages. The only talk page messages that may not be removed (as per WP:BLANKING) are declined unblock requests (but only while blocks are still in effect), confirmed sockpuppetry notices, or shared IP header templates (for anonymous editors) ... and these exceptions are just to keep a user from gaming the system. --Kralizec! (talk) 16:58, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for the reminder. Cst17 (talk) 17:49, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
For reverting vandalism to my user pageKillkola (talk) 20:36, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Miami Golf Magazine
I undid your revert. The edit was to remove the Prod tag, this consttiutes as contested prod. Hence it should not be treated as vandal. SYSS Mouse (talk) 18:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Just wanted to say thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page!--Woland (talk) 17:30, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
== Rollback == Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. ·Add§hore· /Cont 10:01, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Please stop reposting personal attacks to User talk:66.102.80.212. These were placed by an abusive user as part of a content dispute; your continual reposting of this nonsense is vandalism. --66.102.80.212 (talk) 11:35, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- Don't delete warnings without comment, otherwise people keep on putting them back. Cst17 (talk) 11:40, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Friendly reminder about talk page messages
Hello. As a recent editor to User talk:66.102.80.212, I wanted to leave you a friendly reminder that as per WP:USER, editors may remove messages at will from their own talk page. While we may prefer that messages be archived, policy does not prohibit users -including anonymous users- from deleting comments from their own talk pages. The only talk page messages that may not be removed (as per WP:BLANKING) are declined unblock requests (but only while blocks are still in effect), confirmed sockpuppetry notices, or shared IP header templates (for anonymous editors) ... and these exceptions are just to keep a user from gaming the system. --Kralizec! (talk) 16:58, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for the reminder. Cst17 (talk) 17:49, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
For reverting vandalism to my user pageKillkola (talk) 20:36, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Miami Golf Magazine
I undid your revert. The edit was to remove the Prod tag, this consttiutes as contested prod. Hence it should not be treated as vandal. SYSS Mouse (talk) 18:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Just wanted to say thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page!--Woland (talk) 17:30, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Rollback
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. ·Add§hore· /Cont 10:01, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Please stop reposting personal attacks to User talk:66.102.80.212. These were placed by an abusive user as part of a content dispute; your continual reposting of this nonsense is vandalism. --66.102.80.212 (talk) 11:35, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- Don't delete warnings without comment, otherwise people keep on putting them back. Cst17 (talk) 11:40, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Friendly reminder about talk page messages
Hello. As a recent editor to User talk:66.102.80.212, I wanted to leave you a friendly reminder that as per WP:USER, editors may remove messages at will from their own talk page. While we may prefer that messages be archived, policy does not prohibit users -including anonymous users- from deleting comments from their own talk pages. The only talk page messages that may not be removed (as per WP:BLANKING) are declined unblock requests (but only while blocks are still in effect), confirmed sockpuppetry notices, or shared IP header templates (for anonymous editors) ... and these exceptions are just to keep a user from gaming the system. --Kralizec! (talk) 16:58, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for the reminder. Cst17 (talk) 17:49, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
For reverting vandalism to my user pageKillkola (talk) 20:36, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Miami Golf Magazine
I undid your revert. The edit was to remove the Prod tag, this consttiutes as contested prod. Hence it should not be treated as vandal. SYSS Mouse (talk) 18:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Just wanted to say thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page!--Woland (talk) 17:30, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Rollback
I have Page granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Misplaced Pages:New admin school/Rollback and Misplaced Pages:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:17, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
John Carroll
Are you associated with Misplaced Pages? I am on the school board at John Carroll and we have been monitoring JCCHS due to the inappropriate postings.Bcassoc (talk) 02:22, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- No I'm not, I am just a recent changes patroller. Cst17 (talk) 07:41, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
I have Page granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Misplaced Pages:New admin school/Rollback and Misplaced Pages:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:17, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
John Carroll
Are you associated with Misplaced Pages? I am on the school board at John Carroll and we have been monitoring JCCHS due to the inappropriate postings.Bcassoc (talk) 02:22, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- No I'm not, I am just a recent changes patroller. Cst17 (talk) 07:41, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
I have Page granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Misplaced Pages:New admin school/Rollback and Misplaced Pages:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:17, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
John Carroll
Are you associated with Misplaced Pages? I am on the school board at John Carroll and we have been monitoring JCCHS due to the inappropriate postings.Bcassoc (talk) 02:22, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- No I'm not, I am just a recent changes patroller. Cst17 (talk) 07:41, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Page/HelpBox}}
Skip to table of contents |
Archives: Sections of this page older than three days are automatically relocated to the newest archive. |
---|
001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 018 019 020 021 022 023 024 025 026 027 028 029 030 031 032 033 034 035 036 037 038 039 040 041 042 043 044 045 046 047 048 049 050 051 052 053 054 055 056 057 058 059 060 061 062 063 064 065 066 067 068 069 070 071 072 073 074 075 076 077 078 079 080 081 082 083 084 085 086 087 088 089 090 091 092 093 094 095 096 097 098 099 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 |
National variations of the English language have been extensively discussed previously:
|
To report an error in content currently or imminently on the Main Page, use the appropriate section below.
Main Page toolbox- Protected pages
- Commons media protection
- Associated
- It is currently 13:21 UTC.
- Purge the Main Page
- Purge this page
- Where is the error? An exact quotation of the text in question helps.
- Offer a correction if possible.
- References are helpful, especially when reporting an obscure factual or grammatical error.
- Time zones. The Main Page runs on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, currently 13:21 on 14 January 2025) and is not adjusted to your local time zone.
- Can you resolve the problem yourself? If the error lies primarily in the content of an article linked from the Main Page, fix the problem there before reporting it here. Text on the Main Page generally defers to the articles with bolded links. Upcoming content on the Main Page is usually only protected from editing beginning 24 hours before its scheduled appearance. Before that period, you can be bold and fix any issues yourself.
- Do not use {{edit fully-protected}} on this page, which will not get a faster response. It is unnecessary, because this page is not protected, and causes display problems. (See the bottom of this revision for an example.)
- No chit-chat. Lengthy discussions should be moved to a suitable location elsewhere, such as the talk page of the relevant article or project.
- Respect other editors. Another user wrote the text you want changed, or reported an issue they see in something you wrote. Everyone's goal should be producing the best Main Page possible. The compressed time frame of the Main Page means sometimes action must be taken before there has been time for everyone to comment. Be civil to fellow users.
- Reports are removed when resolved. Once an error has been addressed or determined not to be an error, or the item has been rotated off the Main Page, the report will be removed from this page. Check the revision history for a record of any discussion or action taken; no archives are kept.
Errors in the summary of the featured article
Please do not remove this invisible timestamp. See WT:ERRORS and WP:SUBSCRIBE. - Dank (push to talk) 01:24, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Today's FA
Tomorrow's FA
Day-after-tomorrow's FA
Errors with "In the news"
Errors in "Did you know ..."
Current DYK
- ... that of the 156 Conestoga wagons (pictured) brought to the Braddock Expedition of the French and Indian War, only one remained intact by the campaign's end? That's not what the article seems to say. "Only a few wagons of the Braddock Expedition ultimately remained, and they were returned to their original owners when the vehicles arrived at Wills Creek in Pennsylvania." and "In total, 156 wagons are thought to have been employed for the disastrous Braddock Expedition, the only wagon to survive intact being that of William Douglas." meaning that only one wagon survives until now, but multiple survived the expedition (or else they couldn't have been sent back to their owners surely). Fram (talk) 09:06, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Also, surely it should be 'employed by' or 'taken on' the expedition 'during' the war, not 'brought to ... of'. Modest Genius 13:17, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- A rewording does not seem to be in the scope of Errors. The definition of "brought" is "take or go with (someone or something) to a place." which seems close enough to "taken on". SL93 (talk) 02:16, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging nominator PrimalMustelid. SL93 (talk) 18:03, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Also, surely it should be 'employed by' or 'taken on' the expedition 'during' the war, not 'brought to ... of'. Modest Genius 13:17, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, but that is not what the source says. It says (I quote):
- The number of Pennsylvania wagons that arrived back at Wills Creek has not been definitely established. For the service of their wagons, 30 owners received payment for a period greater than the 51 days, but of these, only 10 were paid for services beyond what appears to be July 20. Only the wagon of William Douglas, out of 146 wagons involved, seems to have survived the campaign intact. Inasmuch as the other owners were reimbursed for loss of their wagons, it is likely that those few that arrived back at Fort Cumberland were so badly damaged as to render them unserviceable, and therefore not worth driving back to eastern Pennsylvania.
- In short, the writer is talking about the situation at the end of the campaign, where only the one appears to have survived the campaign in serviceable condition, the others being too damaged to be worth retaining.
- Please note that I am about to log off so will not be able to respond further today. Gatoclass (talk) 18:13, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- So am I expected to emend the hook and/or article, or has the situation resolved itself? PrimalMustelid (talk) 18:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Can someone please pull or correct this? What's the purpose of this page? Fram (talk) 09:44, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Per Gatoclass, my read is that several wagons were in some form you could vaguely still call a wagon, not completely smashed to bits but not usable, a la a totaled car. Only one was actually intact. That could very much be clarified in the article, but as long as there's not a hook–source disagreement, I'm not currently seeing a need to pull. If another admin disagrees, they're welcome to hit the button. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 10:03, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- There is no indication that the wagons which were returned to their owners where "not usable". Only of the "those few that arrived back at Fort Cumberland were so badly damaged as to render them unserviceable" do we know that they were so badly damaged, but it seems (from Gatoclass' pst) that there were only 10 kept in use after 10 July anyway, the others either already damaged or sent back to their owners. There is no indication, in the source nor in the article, that all 155 other wagons were not "intact". Fram (talk) 10:13, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not following your logic at all. The source plainly states that Only the wagon of William Douglas, out of 146 wagons involved, seems to have survived the campaign intact. If it's the only one to have survived intact, then none of the others made it back to their owners, otherwise they too would have "survived intact". Gatoclass (talk) 12:20, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for proving my point. You state "none of the others made it back to their owners", but the article states "Only a few wagons of the Braddock Expedition ultimately remained, and they were returned to their original owners when the vehicles arrived at Wills Creek in Pennsylvania. " Like I already said in my opening post. It can't both be true at the same time that "none of the others made it back to their owners" and "a few wagons were returned to their original owners". Fram (talk) 12:33, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, the article contradicts itself by misstating the source. But that can be fixed simply by editing the article to comply with the source, there is no need to pull the hook. Gatoclass (talk) 12:48, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- If only someone had pointed out yesterday that the hook and the article contradict each other, e.g. by stating about the hook "That's not what the article seems to say." with the relevant quotes. What an utter waste of time is this page and some of its responders yet again. Fram (talk) 13:03, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- If only someone had the ability to improve an article... the fifth bullet point at the top of this page might prove instructive. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:07, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for proving my point. You state "none of the others made it back to their owners", but the article states "Only a few wagons of the Braddock Expedition ultimately remained, and they were returned to their original owners when the vehicles arrived at Wills Creek in Pennsylvania. " Like I already said in my opening post. It can't both be true at the same time that "none of the others made it back to their owners" and "a few wagons were returned to their original owners". Fram (talk) 12:33, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not following your logic at all. The source plainly states that Only the wagon of William Douglas, out of 146 wagons involved, seems to have survived the campaign intact. If it's the only one to have survived intact, then none of the others made it back to their owners, otherwise they too would have "survived intact". Gatoclass (talk) 12:20, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- There is no indication that the wagons which were returned to their owners where "not usable". Only of the "those few that arrived back at Fort Cumberland were so badly damaged as to render them unserviceable" do we know that they were so badly damaged, but it seems (from Gatoclass' pst) that there were only 10 kept in use after 10 July anyway, the others either already damaged or sent back to their owners. There is no indication, in the source nor in the article, that all 155 other wagons were not "intact". Fram (talk) 10:13, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Next DYK
Next-but-one DYK
Errors in "On this day"
Today's OTD
Tomorrow's OTD
Day-after-tomorrow's OTD
Errors in the summary of the featured list
Next Monday's FL
(January 20)
"45 men have served in 46 presidencies". That's true now, but that text will still display on inauguration day. The extra presidency refers to President Grover Cleveland, but Trump is about to enter the same status. So the number of men won't change, but the number of presidencies will. Despite Martin Luther King day, 46 will be wrong after noon Eastern Time or 1700 UTC, January 20. Art LaPella (talk) 07:22, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- If someone remembers, this can be amended in real time on the day... — Amakuru (talk) 07:26, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Friday's FL
(January 17)Monday's FL
(January 20)Errors in the summary of the featured picture
Notice to administrators: When fixing POTD errors, please update the corresponding regular version (i.e. without "protected" in the page title) in addition to the Main Page version linked below.Today's POTD
Tomorrow's POTD
General discussion
Age of Empires
Putting an entry about computer-game on the main page demeans the standing of this encyclopedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.103.145 (talk) 19:10, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- Here we go again. JACOPLANE • 2008-06-19 19:48
- Read systemic bias then stop complaining. Computer and video games (note no hyphen) do not demean anything, least of all this encyclopedia. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 20:04, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- It could be said that complaining about the recognition of a well written comprehensively encyclopaedic article belies your lack of effort in improving articles of a non video game-esque nature. 86.139.50.57 (talk) 22:56, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- I don't mean to support the view that video games shouldn't be on the main page but we don't have to bite the newcomer's head off either. Tourskin (talk) 23:06, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- But newbies are delicious... Raul654 (talk) 06:24, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- What newbie? 80.189.103.145 has been around since September 2007! --199.71.174.100 (talk) 07:57, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- But newbies are delicious... Raul654 (talk) 06:24, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- I don't mean to support the view that video games shouldn't be on the main page but we don't have to bite the newcomer's head off either. Tourskin (talk) 23:06, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- You can't tell for sure. IP addresses can be shared, or might change. The person who wrote the message above might not be the same as the person who edited in September. Puchiko (Talk-email) 11:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- Right. Don't assume anons to be anybody. (S)he may be a rogue admin, which is not likely to be delicious. --199.71.174.100 (talk) 22:04, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- You can't tell for sure. IP addresses can be shared, or might change. The person who wrote the message above might not be the same as the person who edited in September. Puchiko (Talk-email) 11:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- Should've went with the no pictures argument. It would've trolled better.--293.xx.xxx.xx (talk) 01:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hopefully concerns like this don't go into picking the articles to hit the front page. Mac Davis (talk) 01:55, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Main page?
What is main about this page? Should it not be called the Front page or Cover page instead?--ProperFraction (talk) 00:37, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Not sure if "Front" and "Cover" are any better. The page is not in front of nor covering anything, besides what's inside your monitor. --199.71.174.100 (talk) 02:04, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- A load of electronic bits I think!--ProperFraction (talk) 16:57, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Front page would cause a lot of disambiguation issues with Frontpage, and wiki is not paper. ffm 19:03, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Maybe "First Page"? --Howard the Duck 09:58, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- Wasn't there some talk of moving it out of the WP:main namespace entirely? I can't find it under perenniel proposals. AlmostReadytoFly (talk) 14:41, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- Its never really been put forward as a serious proposal, but there has been many, many, short discussions on the topic, the three major ones that occured are in archives 87, 89 and 90.
- All this is easily found in the information box at the top of the page btw :) ☯Ferdia O'Brien /(C) 14:51, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Judy Garland
The years in the blurb should be formatted "(1922–1969)" without spaces, and without linksper WP:MOSDATE. indopug (talk) 01:16, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Done. --- RockMFR 01:27, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- For that matter, I cannot remember the last time that an individual's years of birth and death were included on the main page. Should these be included? It doesn't matter eitherway, I'm just curious as to why we have chosen to do it this time. Bobo. 01:42, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- I believe they were added in response to this. Nufy8 (talk) 01:47, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Interesting, thank you very much for directing me to that link, Nufy8. So is this the "done thing" from now on, birthyear (and deathyear if appropriate) included in a main page featured article biography? It would be good to have consistency eitherway, though I have no opinion as to which would be better. Bobo. 01:52, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Looks like Raul (the FA Director) will probably be including DOB and DOD in all future biography blurbs. Nufy8 (talk) 03:27, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Interesting, thank you very much for directing me to that link, Nufy8. So is this the "done thing" from now on, birthyear (and deathyear if appropriate) included in a main page featured article biography? It would be good to have consistency eitherway, though I have no opinion as to which would be better. Bobo. 01:52, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- We had a recent discussion, and it seems Raul has agreed that the dates are a valuable addition Modest Genius 17:43, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- I believe they were added in response to this. Nufy8 (talk) 01:47, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- For that matter, I cannot remember the last time that an individual's years of birth and death were included on the main page. Should these be included? It doesn't matter eitherway, I'm just curious as to why we have chosen to do it this time. Bobo. 01:42, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
RFC at TFA/R
See Misplaced Pages talk:Today's featured article/requests#Facilitating TFA suggestions, request to unprotect the TFA blurbs and let the community choose them. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:15, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- There is also an alternative proposal to keep the blurbs protected, but to open TFA requests to the community in a more structured way... as overseen by a TFA director. Wrad (talk) 22:16, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Ice on Mars presentation in front page
That's not strictly Main Page material but it is related to its presentation. First, it strikes me that it's slightly hard to find which is the main article of the sentence. Is it Mars or is it Phoenix. Since I've been using wikipedia for some time, it's obviously not Mars, that'd be an article on it. Perhaps it needs to be somehow more prominently shown. Secondly, shouldn't the main article about it be about a mission finding ice on Mars? It's an article about a craft. --Leladax (talk) 23:41, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- For ITN, the link in boldface should be the "main" article. That's the "updated" wikipage, per ITN rules. If the bolded link doesn't lead to an article with details of the story highlighted on ITN, please consider posting a complaint at WP:ITN/C or Template talk:In the news. --199.71.174.100 (talk) 01:48, 25 June 2008 (UTC)