This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sindhian (talk | contribs) at 13:58, 1 July 2008 (→Three revert rule on RSS). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:58, 1 July 2008 by Sindhian (talk | contribs) (→Three revert rule on RSS)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)June 2008
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Far left has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Misplaced Pages. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Misplaced Pages. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bblogspot\.com' (link(s): http://nandigramunited.blogspot.com/2008/05/ministers-kin-dead-fresh-cpim-trinamool.html) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Misplaced Pages's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 07:18, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Personal attacks at Talk:Far left
Coming from someone who supports your point of view at that article, please desist with the personal attacks. Talking about other editors' "communist bullying style" is unquestionably a personal attack, and only furthers to worsen a situation. Please don't keep on making the attacks, or I myself will support a block on this account. Please read WP:NPA. The Evil Spartan (talk) 08:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. The Evil Spartan (talk) 08:57, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Notice of discussion
Hello, Sindhian. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic WP:ANI#Adding warning templates to article talk pages. Thank you. — Satori Son 13:55, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
- In regards to the ANI thread... one point of confusion is your addition of user warning templates to article talk pages, as you did here. Those templates are intended to warn specific users, e.g. you would place them, on User talk:The person who did the blanking. Placing them on article talk pages is just confusing to people, and is not the appropriate place.
- I am still looking into the remaining concerns raised at ANI. --Jaysweet (talk) 14:42, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Communist Party of India (Marxist). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Jaysweet (talk) 17:12, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:33, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Declassified documents related to the Sino-Indian war
Hi. This article was deleted under Criteria for Speedy Deletion, as it appeared to be disparaging in nature. If your intention is to provide links to original documents, such as these, you might consider a site like Wikisource, where original documents are posted. Best, UltraExactZZ ~ Evidence 20:07, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Your vandal report
Two things; firstly the paragraph which you posted at WP:AIV is in the wrong place - this page is only for the reporting of specific users accused of vandalism, and a defined formula must be used. WP:AN/I would be more approriate. Secondly, there is no evidence to suggest that you ever had a talk page. Please remember that a page can only be deleted by an admin, and simple page blanking leaves obvious traces, of which there are none on your userpage. --Anthony.bradbury 21:19, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Your report to AIV
I'm sorry, but AIV is not the appropriate venue for the following; == Harrassment and vandalism ==
I am new to Misplaced Pages and am still learning. 'Soman, 'Ism Shism' and other annon users' who seem to be working in tandem to escape the 3R rule are deleting well referenced articles in CPI(M) and far left.
They are ganging up against me and take turns in reverting my edits. They delete the whole section without suggesting alternatives. Kindly look into the history of Soman in CPI(M)and you will see that this game has been played with many other editors in the past making them leave in frustation and compromizing the NPOV of the article. Whole sections which are relevant and well referenced have been deleated I kindly request a detailed investigation to find out that if this gang has been doing this for long time. Please ensure this type of harrasment to editors is not repeated and the articles reflect NPOV. Someone has also deleted my user pageSindhian (talk) 21:04, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
I suggest that you take your complaint to Jaysweet or The Evil Spartan, both experienced editors. There seems to be both a content dispute and accusations of edit warring/socking, which is not what AIV is for. Cheers. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:20, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
- I am about to take off, and may not be on Misplaced Pages very much until Wednesday. However, if I get time I will take a look at CPI(M) and see what I can find. I think you are right that a "controversies" section would be appropriate, but we need to be very careful that we use extremely reliable sources and avoid sensationalism. I'll take a look when I get time, but again, it may not be until Monday. Cheers! --Jaysweet (talk) 21:30, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Readding old material
Hi. When readding old passages of Ghandar_galpa (Hkelkar's sock) from the December 07/January 08 edit war at CPI(M), you might want to go through the archives of the talk page. For example in the development of the discussions, it was discovered that the claim on Harrison's comments on caste were a pure lie (Harrison discussed CPI leadership in Madras, prior to split). Likewise it was discovered that Frossard was misquoted by Ghandar_galpa. --Soman (talk) 09:22, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
why am I blocked
I am shocked to see that I am blocked. In fact I have seen this happening to many authors who had a critical view of CPI(M). When editing CPI(M) website I looked into the history and found some intresting material which was deleted in due cource of time and tried to get it re introduced. That should not qualify me as a sock puppet. Where is it written that reverting someones edit makes you a sockpuppet of that person. Someone even calls it 'patented' in his complain.
|
Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):
Request handled by: Tiptoety 01:13, 1 July 2008 (UTC) |
Three revert rule on RSS
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Dance With The Devil (talk) 07:25, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- I am srprised that you put me a warning when you refuce to debate the issues on the discussion page inspite of numerous requests. From this I understand that you are more interestested in pusing your POVSindhian (talk) 13:58, 1 July 2008 (UTC)