This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 68.248.74.14 (talk) at 04:57, 5 July 2008 (→epic fail: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:57, 5 July 2008 by 68.248.74.14 (talk) (→epic fail: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
User talk:Smith Jones/My archive <---ARCHIVE
Given the level of dysfunction that has come to prevail on Misplaced Pages, the most appropriate course for a principled scientist is to withdraw from the project.
The bureaucracy should either take corrective steps to fix this situation, or else suffer the eventual loss of huge amounts of valuable talent and volunteered resources.
If you agree with this statement, post it to your pages, and pass it on. (discuss this here)
Alan Cabal
Smith Jones: They actually deleted the article. I left a note for User:Stifle who closed the PROD. It's hilarious and unacceptable at the same time. I mean this is actually the sort of content you want in an encyclopedia. Important current writers. But they've decided to annihilate the article for the second time. Anyways, put in a comment or two for the article's return and let's get this done.-Manhattan Samurai (talk) 14:03, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- So it continues here: Misplaced Pages:Deletion_review#Alan_Cabal.-Manhattan Samurai (talk) 17:32, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
FYI
I have created a userbox (User:SheffieldSteel/Pigs). I hope that you do not find it offensive - it is meant in good humour and as a tribute to your effective and dramatic use of words. If you have any problems with it, please let me know and I will delete it immediately. Respectfully, SHEFFIELDSTEEL 19:27, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Deletion_review/Log/2008_July_3#Alan_Cabal
Hi Smith Jones. It appears from your comments that you wish to keep the Alan Cabal article. The procedure in a Deletion Review is to format your comment like this:
- Overturn - followed by your reasons why the decision by the closer was incorrect. Bear in mind this is not a debate about the article, but a debate about the AfD procedure. Arguments about the article itself will carry no weight and will only cloud the issue. Regards SilkTork * 23:05, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
WP:ANI
Sorry, SmithJones, I don't know what you did here but it broke the page & I've reverted it. Do you want to have another go? --Rodhullandemu 00:23, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Archive
Yes Talk:Natural Cures "They" Don't Want You to Know About needed archiving. With a tricky title like this, the obvious way to create the archive is by copy&pasting the title. If you chose the difficult method of retyping it, then for goodness sake, get the spelling and punctuation right! I will make it easy for you: copy this state of the article to Talk:Natural Cures "They" Don't Want You to Know About/Archive 1 and create the necessary link. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 01:55, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Well done. But you don't just blank the talk page, you create a link in it to the archive. See Help:Archiving a talk page. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 02:23, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Bring em on
I removed your prod. I like your style, however. You have tourettes, I have autism. We should keep in touch. I think we might have a lot in common. Stay cool, bro. JeanLatore (talk) 03:37, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Trudeau (disambig)
Hi, thanks for your correction. Salesman was the word I was groping for! --SesquipedalianVerbiage (talk) 07:24, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
epic fail
I sucked cambridge's ballz all night.
Have a good day.--68.248.74.14 (talk) 04:57, 5 July 2008 (UTC)