Talk:Charlie Crist - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Benjiboi (talk | contribs) at 03:24, 20 July 2008 (restoring project tag). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 03:24, 20 July 2008 by Benjiboi (talk | contribs) (restoring project tag)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Florida Mid‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Florida State University Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida State University, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Florida State University on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Florida State UniversityWikipedia:WikiProject Florida State UniversityTemplate:WikiProject Florida State UniversityFlorida State University
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Misplaced Pages. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.
Explanation for inclusion in WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies: Charlie Crist has come within the scope of LGBT studies due to being "dogged by gay rumors" in international media.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Archive 1

Bar Exam Information

Cut from article:

Crist's qualifications to be attorney general were challenged during the 2002 election, when it was revealed that he had failed the state bar exam three times before passing. The attorney general, often described as the state's "top lawyer," is required by the state constitution to have passed the bar.

Shouldn't we say WHO challenged his qualifications? And what's this about "it was revealed"? Had he been hiding his 3 failures or lying about it? The text I cut makes it sound like he had been masquerading as a competent lawyer when (surprise!) we all found out that he really was a failure. A hasty read might even mislead you into thinking that, required to have passed the bar (but revealed to have failed it), he cheated and defrauded the voters!

If that's a POV someone wants described in the article fine, but please source it. I bet this point of view comes from one of his opponents. Anyone got time to google it? --Uncle Ed 13:39, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

The other candidates in the race (one Republican candidate in particular, I recall), challenged his qualifications on this basis. The user wrote that "it was revealed" because bar exam scores are not public knowledge, and when this was reported, it was new information that would not normally be public. The last sentence, about the constitutional requirement to pass the bar, made it relevant to the race and makes it relevant here. I agree, though, that source information would be useful. Someone should find the SPTimes article (or other Florida paper) and reinsert the sentence as it was before, with the sourcing added. Would that satisfy Uncle Ed's objections? 202.156.6.54 11:08, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Deputy Secretary Appointment

There is an odd sentence in the background which indicates that Governor Jeb Bush "appointed" Charlie Crist as Deputy Secretary of a state agency. That does not sound right. I believe Secretaries of agencies appoint deputy secretaries....not governors. It could certainly be true that the Governor ordered one of his Secretaries that serve "at his pleasure" to hire Charlie Crist...or this sentence could be an attempt to show much-sought-after support of Jeb Bush for Charlie Crist. Wouldn't it be organizationally dangerous for an agency secretary not to hire the deputy secretaries working under him or her???

It says "Crist is a signatory to the gay marriage amendment petition in Florida." Is that the amendment supporting gay marriage or the amendment against it ("Defense of Marriage Amendment")? --Pygmalion

Can someone please look at this point? Crist's website says he's against marital benefits for gays but is for legally binding contracts?

2006 Race

Might want to add in that there are currently several outstanding accusations that Crist is/was a long time lover of Bruce Carlton Jordan, a man serving parole until 2011 for fraud/theft. ----

If there are reliable sources for it from a reliable source, which means not a blog, then maybe we can insert it. Captainktainer * Talk 21:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Gay?

Perhaps someone should add something about the allegations that Charlie Crist is gay?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Amanojyaku (talk • contribs)

I added the charges and denial. Arbusto 05:48, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Not quite sure I would call them "charges" -- makes same sex desire sound like a bad thing. 24.250.234.251 23:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Many people think is is a bad thing. But besides that point, it is a charge if he's lying about it not being true. In other words, it's a charge of dishonesty. Personally, I think it's rubbish, and should be removed from the article, however.--216.199.161.66 23:04, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Why should it be removed? A gay governor would certainly be notable. The existence of this controversy is verifiable per reliable sources. Interestingstuffadder 21:16, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

There appears to be only one source in the three references linked. The politics1 link is simply a link to the Broward/Palm Beach New Times piece, and the New York Blade quotes Max Linn, who, like the anonymous source quoted by the New Times, is a former Republican-turned-independent who just happened to be running for Lieutenant Governor as a Reform Party candidate, opposite Charlie Christ and Jeff Kottkamp. (The New Times says the source "is not active in Democratic Party politics", which is technically true, but exceptionally deceitful, if he was in fact Max Linn.) And for what it's worth, the New Times author also outed Mark Foley in 2004, and is on a crusade to out gay Republicans (as he states in the linked piece).

Horologium talk - contrib 03:06, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Is that all you care about "gay people"? Who cares if he's gay. 76.110.82.251 01:51, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, for what it's worth, it pretty much excludes him from being McCain's running mate, which makes it pretty mentionable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.83.161.143 (talk) 16:01, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

He looks the part. But I don't believe we should add that to an encyclopedic article unless he either comes out on his own and/or is "outed". WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 19:48, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

At the very least, it's an urban legend that keeps popping up. Do a Google search and you'll find literally hundreds of articles and blog posts on this. Most aren't particularly substansive, but its existence as an oft-repeated rumour can't be ignored. I'd argue in favor of mentioning it here, since there will probably be plenty of people looking up this article to find out the details about his sexuality. Although it would be best to emphasize that it's little more than a rumour. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.144.130.75 (talk) 19:31, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Granted there are going to be rumors about any good-looking, single male politicians, but the rumors about him being gay might very well cost him the VP nomination. The fact that it is widespread rumor deserves mention at least. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.233.236.143 (talk) 00:24, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

NPOV !??

This article would certainly be a credit to any staff supporting a Crist campaign. However, it is an embarrassing discredit to Misplaced Pages. I hope an editor with more ability to defend himself than I will dispute NPOV on this one. Quickly.

Ryvr 01:43, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

I would like to be more specific with my concerns. I hope others join the discussion on this.

The tone, with language like "During his time in office, Crist has been applauded by civil rights and consumer groups ..." sounds very much like campaign material... "Crist had by that time already won the attorney general's position." again ... "won" not "elected" the word choice in many, many sentences consistently uses a word which "glows" far more than a NPOV-reasonable word would.

"Crist's fundraising activities were not immune to controversy." When the article addresses possible criticism it uses weak language in contrast to the enthusiastic language used to describe what are perceived as his positive qualities.

'Is "pro-life and pro-family," however, he has no plans to change abortion law in the state of Florida ... ' Sounds great, doesn't it?

"Crist's website says Crist strongly supports Florida's Defense of Marriage Act which is generally opposed by gays and lesbians." Uh, and were Jim Crow laws "generally opposed" by African Americans? Opinions on civil rights are not normally limited to the group against which discrimination occurs. I would think "strongly opposes equal marriage rights" would be quite accurate.

"Right to Die: Promote the availability of end of life choices, including living wills and coordination with hospice care." This sounds fishy and sneaky. I think it is only mentioning the very positive interpretation of a political position here. Great for a campaign brochure!

Anyway, I am personally indeed a liberal. Which gives me very careful pause to dispute NPOV here. But I do think my judgment in this case is unclouded by my personal opinions. I want the opinions of others too. Perhaps we can find an article which glows and glows toward a liberal politician and make that fair too.

Please, please discuss!

Ryvr 19:37, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

I have put an NPOV "check" request on specificly for violation of "fairness of tone" NPOV policy. See my comments above for examples.

Ryvr 20:12, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Personal Life section

While I was not the one who removed it, and am a bit troubled by the fact that it was by someone who has never edited here before, I support the deletion. As I pointed out above, there were some sourcing issues with it, and the section about his new girlfriend appeared to be nothing more than a weak attempt at a rebuttal. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Horologium (talk • contribs) 21:59, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

I noticed the insertion of the "new girlfriend" and thought it seemed a bit excessive, but I let it go. I didn't read the previous paragraph...which now seems irrelevant considering his governorship. I think your decision to remove the whole paragraph was a good one. Cary Bass 22:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

It was all over the news the other day, and if we get to talk about him and his male love interests, why can't we talk about him and his female love interests? I'm okay either keeping everything or deleting everything but let's be consistent. Philwelch 17:09, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

I undid the removal because it was removed by someone who never had done any prior editing and without any discussion... that just doesn't sit right with me. While I don't agree or think the section should be in there, i'm not going let it be deleted without a discussion. --Napnet 06:25, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

WP:BLP necessitates that unsourced or unreliably-sourced information of this nature must be "immediately" deleted. JGHowes - 14:59, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote requested: Restore/Keep off - "Controversies while Governor" section

An editor removed the new section below saying in his/her opinion that it was not really a controversy. See June 26, 2007 for how the new section and references appeared in the article (the source code here also contains the references). Please vote below to Restore or Keep off this new section. 5Q5 18:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Controversies while Governor

On May 24, 2007, Governor Crist signed "Senate Bill 1372: Relating to Agriculure & Consumer Services." The new law included a provision that protected the interests of fireworks merchants in the state by prohibiting Florida cities and counties from enacting any new local laws affecting the sale or use of fireworks until a task force study could be completed of the state's fireworks laws in 2008. The governor signed the bill over the objection of the Florida Fire Chiefs' Association, which had wanted to retain the option of local goverments being able to temporarily ban the sale and use of fireworks during emergencies. Said one Fire Chief in whose drought-stricken Florida county a temporary ban was effectively nullified: "We lost the power to do this. We were overruled by the state. The fireworks lobby is more powerful than local governments."

Restore. The Governor took a power away from local governments to protect their citizens and instead he protected big business. At least four counties, Palm Beach, Charlotte, Alachua, and Hernando were affected when they lost their emergency fireworks bans (might be more, did a quick search). I am sure the people in those counties consider this action by the governor controversial and alarming. His signature on the bill affected every city and county in the state. 5Q5 18:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Keep Off I don't think this really has any value for an encyclopedic article which was why i removed it. i tried to move it to the talk section but my mobile phone wasn't cooperating. To me it is similar to the gay issue... also, what law is passed that isn't controversial? are they all going to be added into this section? i just don't think this has garnered enough 'press' to be considered controversial (this was the first and only place i have heard about it and i am in tallahassee). anyways just my opinion. --Napnet 05:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Of course controversies should be included. Misplaced Pages is supposed to be a balanced NPOV source of information, not a censored, sanitized version of a politician's life. The article should be neutral, but include warts and all. We can get the sanitized press release version on the politician's website. Misplaced Pages should be a more complete view. I plan to reintroduce this section, but I welcome any comments before I do so.--MiamiManny (talk) 02:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

There is no reason that criticisms can't be included as long as they cite reliable sources and are not written from a biased perspective. I have removed some content in the past but only because it was uncited.Athene cunicularia (talk) 04:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Convicted Felons

I deleted the section on convicted felon voting rights, as it was a clear violation of NPOV. Use of term 'pander' shows the person who added it had an axe to grind, and also couldn't be bothered to spell Gov. Crist's name correctly. Schoop (talk) 15:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Crist's Connection to Zimmerman Scandal

Al Zimmerman is the recently charged Florida DCF press secretary who offered teenage boys alcohol and money to pose nude for porn videos. In addition to working in the Crist administration, Zimmerman actually listed Crist on his resume as a personal reference. According to the Tallahassee Democrat, "Zimmerman listed Gov. Charlie Crist as a reference when he applied at DCF in 2005. Crist, attorney general at the time, said he knew Zimmerman slightly as a TV reporter in the Tampa Bay area and probably recommended him —as he'd do for almost anyone." Crist's connection to this nationally publicized scandal is deserving of mention. I am rather surprised that the personal life section has been deleted here since the last time I visited. I plan to restore the personal life section as well as Crist's connection to the Zimmerman scandal, but I welcome the comments of others before I do so.--MiamiManny (talk) 02:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

I would definitely support a Personal Life section on Crist, as long as it is neutral, and merely mentions only specific facts in an encyclopedic context. If any allegations about his personal life are capable of being cited, as was asserted above, and those allegations can be summarized in NPOV and without utilizing copyrighted info, then they absolutely should be in here as well, just as for any major public figure, regardless of the specifics. Even positive facts should be eligible for a Personal Life section, provided they meet notability, NPOV, and other guidelines. P.F. Bruns (talk) 07:51, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

He is the first Republican Florida governor to succeed a Republican Florida governor?

I have removed that statement from the opening paragraph, as, according to the following page, it is not true: http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_Governors_of_Florida Mmortal03 (talk) 15:45, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

But it /is/ true that he is the first Republican /elected/ to succeed a Republican (the other cases are Lieutenant governors who succeeded a governor who died in office.) It's noteworthy enough to include a corrected version in the article. --Heath 128.173.146.4 (talk) 18:04, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

name pronounciation

How is his name pronounced? (And obviously it should be added to the lede) Is it like "Christ" or "Crisp"? --brew crewer (yada, yada) 21:43, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Crist's sex life; Misplaced Pages is not a gossip magazine

I deleted references that Crist "has been linked to" a number of women, the names of some of the women, etc. "Has been linked to a number of women" -- pure trashy gossip. This does not belong in Misplaced Pages. Also note that the zeal to insert such material is arbitrary: it's because Crist has been single for a long time. We do not see attempts to list the last four or more lovers of every living person who gets an article in Misplaced Pages. This information is available about Charlie Crist because the mass media have set themselves to reporting it. That mere availability is one reason people insert it into Misplaced Pages. For those who need to be hit with a 2x4 to understand what the issues are: (1) the fact that Charlie Crist has dated rich, famous, powerful women has nothing to do with his notability; (2) sometimes in the last 35 years or so Crist has also dated women who weren't rich, famous, or powerful, but nobody wants to put them in the public glare. About the gay rumors, somebody wrote here that Misplaced Pages has to acknowledge them because they're there. This is a misunderstanding about Misplaced Pages in general, and it is a direct violation of the BLP rules. If you want to know the gossip about somebody, search elsewhere on the Web. Read gossip magazines. The fact that a person becomes the subject of a permanent rumor campaign that they are homosexual is NOT, in itself, notable for Misplaced Pages purposes. Misplaced Pages is not about "everything". On top of that, probably any honest who has looked into the subject of gay rumors can cite cases of false "gay rumors". Hurmata (talk) 06:49, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

His sex-life is actually very important. If he was a star baseball player I might agree that his sex-life is pure gossip that is unfit for an encyclopedia. However, politicians are different. Voters place a huge emphasis on a candidates personal life. Being plain single versus being single while being involved with multiple relationships will make a major difference in votes. Therefore, the lack of information on his multiple relationships is at best a major void in the article and at worst misleading. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 14:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

In prologue, I cite from WP:BLP:

"Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid; it is not our job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives."

One of the consequences of this policy is to REJECT as a criterion for publishing something in a BLP that "voters place huge importance" on it. I also object to your resorting to the notion of "mulitiple relationships". One of my major earlier points is that most people have had mulitiple relationships. Misplaced Pages has decisively rejected the notion that by you being a politician, you give the news media and every Internet entity carte blanche to gossip about your multiple relationships. All that aside, understand that one of the things Misplaced Pages is *not* is a voter information project. Hurmata (talk) 04:46, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

WP:BLP is the correct policy to apply to this situation, however, the focus is placed in the wrong subsection. The applicable subsection of WP:BLP is WP:WELLKNOWN, which refers to well-known public figures, and states:

If an allegation or incident is notable, relevant, and well-documented by reliable published sources, it belongs in the article — even if it's negative....

--brew crewer (yada, yada) 17:28, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Charlie Crist's gayness is undocumented. There is a persistent rumor he is gay. His being gay will NEVER be well documented unless (1) Crist declares it, or (2) the media stalk him 24/365 and catch him in a series of trysts, or (3) documentation is developed of indicators of a long term intimate relationship (purchase property together, spend major holidays together, designate each other as heirs, etc.). Likewise, under the status quo, those who insist on believing the rumor will have room to do so. Reporting persistent rumors is JUST the kind of thing BLP is designed to squelch. Hurmata (talk) 18:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Many people raise the fact that Gov. Crist "has been mentioned as being under consideration as a possible running mate" to the Republican party's presidential nominee. This claim of notability is bogus. Misplaced Pages notability usually EXCLUDES flash in the pan events/developments like being RUMORED to be under consideration as a VP running mate. Recall that presidential nominees do not divulge who's on their list of possibilities. There is virtually NEVER *documentation* as Misplaced Pages defines it that politician X is a VP possibility. What there are is hundreds of lists by pundits or reporters. All they are is gossip accompanied by half hearted disclaimers that "this list is just my thinking, it's an exercise in futility that we pundits all love to repeat in every presidential election", blah blah. Recall also that as soon as the two selections are made, the rumors about every other possibility immediate turn as stale as that loaf of bread you've had in your fridge for two weeks. A politician can't put on their resume, "TWO presidential elections ago, three leading newspapers reported I was RUMORED to be on the VP short list". In sum, being rumored to be a VP running mate possibility is NOT notable for Misplaced Pages. Hurmata (talk) 18:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Please see WP:WELLKNOWN. Rumors, when they have significant coverage in reliable sources, do belong in a politicians bio. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 19:03, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Gay rumours?

There's more to it actually. The Telegraph thought it worth mentioning that his recent marriage has been suggested as a riposte to those who say that he may be gay. Whether he is or not, this is an issue worth mentioning (since it reflects on his political beliefs - the Republicans are against gay marriage, but Crist is not)). The issue is valid. Malick78 (talk) 22:25, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

I agree, and this information was included in the article until recently. See subsection above. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 01:49, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

I do not accept this reasoning. You can get 100 reputable newspapers to repeat gossip -- that doesn't legitimize the insertion the gossip into Misplaced Pages. This new "riposte" is just a ruse to keep the rumor alive. And it incorporates circular reasoning: "He's gay. Oh, well, if he gets married, it's insincere, because he's gay". I suggest that your reasoning turns on several misunderstandings: a misunderstanding of the "valid source" rule, a misunderstanding of the policy stated at WP:BLP, and a misunderstanding of the burden of proof. As to the last, we don't need to substantiate he's *not* gay, we need rather to substantiate that he *is* gay. When discussion departs from specific *acts* a living person may or may not have carried out to address their traits, then it is sometimes *not* sufficient to find a "valid" source that says that *people are saying* claim X is true. No, what Misplaced Pages needs is a valid source that says that *the claim X is true*. To take a similar example: an endless stream of reports that *there are* some people who *want* to believe Tom Cruise is gay *does not substantiate* the claim that "Tom Cruise is gay". Claims of this kind, namely titillating, *objectively* unsubstantiated, and liable to "have legs" for 50 years -- are EXACTLY the kind of claim that WP:BLP is meant to exclude. Bottom line: Misplaced Pages is NOT about everything that the masses want to talk about. Besides, your statement, "it reflects on his political beliefs" has the type of carelessly reasoned statement that needs to be scrubbed from Misplaced Pages articles. It's a superb, fabulous example of that phenomenon, a statement that's totally false, but it's succinct to the point of elegance while any refutation of it takes lots of sentences. Here goes. You seem to be engaging in circular reasoning:

"Crist bucks his party's stance on same sex marriage. *If* Crist were gay, then it would be even more interesting that he's doing so. I want Crist to be a greater source of interest. Therefore I embrace the rumor that he is gay."

Next, we can't tell precisely what you meant because your wording is so ambiguous. It *could* be construed as "whether you are homosexual or heterosexual will likely determine your stance on legalizing "same sex" marriage". But what you (almost certainly) meant is that "whether it is alleged that some prominent Republican is homosexual" "reflects on his political beliefs". EITHER WAY, since there are Republicans of either sexual orientation bucking their party on this, then by logic, one's own sexuality is irrelevant. Hurmata (talk) 04:46, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Please see WP:WELLKNOWN. Rumors, when they have significant coverage in reliable sources, do belong in a politicians bio. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 19:03, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

The link from The Telegraph is acceptable to me. Bob Norman, the author of the piece in the New Times Broward/Palm Beach, has stated that he wants to out gay Republicans, simply because they are gay and Republican, and I'm not sure that he is a reliable source in this case. (The link is to a piece he published in 2006, in which he was pushing the exact same story, the week before Crist was elected. One of his sources in that piece was running against Crist in the governor's race as a minor-party candidate. Another of the "sources" (and I use the term loosely) is known to have a casual relationship with the truth, and another doesn't know Crist personally.) One reporter pushing a fable does not a story make, but the Telegraph piece (which eliminates some of the more overheated rhetoric) is probably enough to adequately cite the rumors. It's not libelous to state that someone is gay, but that doesn't mean that it's okay to report falsehoods as fact. Horologium (talk) 19:01, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Request for Comment (RfC) regarding whether to report rumors about sexual orientation

Template:RFCbio

I am the editor who has issued the RfC. There has been a copious and constructive debate on this matter for close to two days, with no agreement reached. The debate is to be found in the immediately preceding section, Crist's sex life; Misplaced Pages is not a gossip magazine. In particular, does the policy statement given in WP:WELLKNOWN allow the reporting of this type of rumor? Hurmata (talk) 22:48, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

I have looked over a lot of the sources, both the ones presented here and the ones on Google News right now. To me, and granted I could be wrong, but to me it seems like the rumors exist mostly because he fits a few stereotypes that make him convenient fodder for late night talk shows. Most of the sources are either satire or mostly humorous in tone. There's no evidence, it's just basically a "Hey, he's old and not married, he must be gay" sort of thing. I'm not really sure Misplaced Pages should repeat that sort of stuff just because a respectable source or two picked it up. Granted, if hundreds of sources ran with it that would strongly suggest notability... but as it is, it's a bunch of blogs, satire/joke newspapers and a UK-based newspaper. So it's really just a rumor, with very marginal sourcing... from what I can tell so far it doesn't belong. Making jokes about how Christ fits a certain stereotype is fine for some sites, but I think for an encyclopedia, we just shouldn't include a non-notable rumor. If the rumor can be shown to be notable, I'd reconsider. Hope this was helpful and not too rambling. --Rividian (talk) 03:25, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

This is a sticky matter that we deal with at WP:LGBT. I've placed a link to the RfC at the project talk page. If we take a look at two similar issues: Jodie Foster and Larry Craig, our actions in the past have been to tag the articles and cite excellent reliable and verifiable sources that state the person him/herself has stated s/he's gay or lesbian, or that someone else has irrefutable evidence of a same-sex romantic or sexual relationship. Jodie Foster has not said in public to a reliable source that she is a lesbian, although she made some "comments of interest" about "her beautiful Cydney" with whom she has raised two children and lived for 20 years. All we can report, despite the huge amount of speculation in the gay press, is that she said those comments, and the facts known about her relationship. Larry Craig had not admitted he had same sex relationships, but being arrested for it let that cat out of the bag. Rumors to smear a political candidate can come from dubious sources. I would use mainstream news press in Florida, no talk shows, and nothing politically motivated (i.e. Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, or other radio/TV pundit shows). If Crist had the same depth of relationships as Jim McGreevy, I betcha we would have heard a lot more by now, particularly in Florida—a very conservative state. --Moni3 (talk) 13:01, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes, and please bear in mind that unlike WP:WELLKNOWN, which is the Wikipeida policy that supports the inclusion of rumours (whether substantiated or not) that were reported in reliable sources, conclusions reached at the WP:LGBT Wikiproject aren't Misplaced Pages policy. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 20:27, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Moni3 did not say that they did, but the LGBT project has a good deal of experience with this topic, as flashing the gay card seems to be a fast-track to an edit war. ] also notes that material that merits inclusion in an article will have a "multitude of reliable sources", which is not the case with this issue. We have one reliable source (The Daily Telegraph) and a not-so-reliable source (a columnist with an axe to grind), and a swarm of blogs out to smear Crist because he has an "R" after his name. I've already noted above that I am not opposed to including the allegations (using the Telegraph article as a citation), but this probably falls short of the threshold for inclusion under WP:WELLKNOWN. Horologium (talk) 21:19, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

A very real threat to the encyclopedia is spreading rumors that are unsubstantiated. Crist is probably aware of the rumors and since he hasn't addressed them, doesn't really seem to mind them. But Tom Cruise has successfully sued to rescue his reputation. --Moni3 (talk) 21:41, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

(yada, yada) can't stop misapplying WP:WELLKNOWN, whose relevant passage is "If an allegation or incident is notable, relevant, and well-documented by reliable published sources". Some Wikipedians are not distinguishing between an *alleged event* and *media coverage of an allegation*. I think the context imposes the interpretation of the word "allegation" not in the strict sense, but rather as the *incident alleged*. (So let's try to fix the bad choice of wording of "allegation".) Brewcrewer also fails to distinguish between a trait or creed -- which is a general thing -- and specific *acts* or *incidents*. The rumors about Crist do not involve "well documented allegations" of specific acts or events. Only most recently do we have ANY allegations of specific acts or events, namely the reports that *name* two men who claim -- or have it claimed about them that they bragged -- to have had sex with Crist. But these "allegations" are not yet well documented. If they ever become well documented, then those who resort to citing WP:WELLKNOWN will still have to convincingly argue their "notability" and "relevance". Hurmata (talk) 06:38, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Comment. I think, at the very least, linking this issue to the Mark Foley scandal as that's where issues of Crist's sexuality came into more prominence. I would fully support adding "dogged by gay rumors but denies it" or similar.

John McCain's would-be VP Charlie Crist to marry after being dogged by gay rumours, The Daily Telegraph
Crist Denies Trysts: GOP frontrunner: I have never had sex with a man; New Times Broward-Palm Beach - this article shows the connections between Charlie Crist, Bruce Carlton Jordan and Jason Wetherington, both of whom claim to have had sex with Crist.

I'm sure more is available but we should step cautious here. Banjeboi 23:11, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

I am absolutely dead-set against the New Times piece. I have detailed why it is not a suitable source several times on this page. Norman ran the same story twice, in 2006 and again in 2008, after his first run didn't gain any traction. This time, precisely one reliable source nibbled. If there was any real substance to the rumors, I daresay that they would have received wider play by now, since Crist has met with McCain at his home in Arizona, and consistently appears on short lists of likely VP candidates for McCain. Horologium (talk) 23:27, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps some of those detailed explanations have been archived as I only see one detailed above. Regardless, I also don't agree on eliminating this source as being useful. I'm not using it to show Crist as being gay but that he has been accused, and denied those accusations. The piece seems to delve into that these two gay guys claimed to have sex, the claims are unprovable and Crist denies the charges. Is that really that problematic? Banjeboi 23:50, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Some more reliable sources: , .--brew crewer (yada, yada) 23:38, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

As I am not willing to pay for the articles, I cannot assess them (although I agree that the sources are acceptable), and I am 300 miles from home, unable to visit the archive at my library. Only one of the articles mentions the gay allegations in the portion I can read, but I have to point out that your third source (from the Sarasota Herald-Tribune) and the fifth source (from the Star-Banner) are the same article. All of these sources, however, appear to be more reliable than the Bob Norman piece I have been railing against. Horologium (talk) 23:57, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Comment. Here's another source about how the rumors are intensified as he is being considered for a VP spot. NYT Sunday Preview: Those Charlie Crist Rumors .

Opponent outs GOP candidate for Fla. governor: Crist has denied rumors, opposes gay marriage Here's another article which details Crist being outed and then a few instances of being asked by different media if it's true (he denies). It also explains the potential tension being gay would hold in light of his record against some LGBT rights. Banjeboi 23:50, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes, that Washington Blade article was the other one I addressed in last year's discussion. As I mentioned, the source in that article was running against the Crist/Kottcamp ticket (as the Reform Party's Lieutenant Governor candidate), and is not an appropriate source. Horologium (talk) 00:04, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Again I have to disagree with you, if it's an issue that his opponent was outing him then we simply state that - such as "Crist's opponent in the race outed him but Crist has steadfastly denied the claim in several subsequent media interviews." Your concern would seems to be with the original claim not the sourcing or reliability of the reporting. Banjeboi 00:24, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Banjboi should not speak so loosely. We don't yet have "opponent outing Crist", rather "opponent *claiming* to out Crist". In any case, Misplaced Pages is not a forum for outing people. I myself accept the principle of outing people who would prefer to keep their sexual orientation private, under certain conditions; but I also believe with equal intensity that Misplaced Pages is not the place to carry out outings. BTW I have no knowledge about Crist: I've never lived anywhere near Florida, I don't know anybody who knows the man. I personally have no real evidence he's gay -- and I haven't seen any reports that persuade me that anybody else has any real evidence. Hurmata (talk) 06:38, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Actually i was using the exact terminology of the media report - "Opponent outs GOP candidate for Fla. governor: Crist has denied rumors, opposes gay marriage". I understand there are myriad reasons for people remaining closeted about facets of their lives but also see that once someone is more honest then the issue generally goes away by itself. If Crist is gay it's generally his business but if he denies it meanwhile blocking legislation that benefit LGBT people as a way to preserve that closet then I definitely have little patience. I believe in the Netherlands they dismissed a high-ranking official not because he was gay but because he was closeted and concerns were that it would be used against him to influence voting. I share similar concerns. Banjeboi 21:41, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

"If Crist is gay ... while". IF, IF, IF. "I believe such and such happened in some other country -- I don't have enough specifics, but I believe it happened anyway". Laughter's good for the soul, the saying goes, so thanks for the laughs. Besides, what you wrote is total foolishness: you can't "dismiss a high ranking official" for refusing to acknowledge being gay; you can't "dismiss a high ranking official" on the grounds that people might disapprove of them. No; you hold the election, and see whether the people vote against the person. For your claim to make any sense, "they" would have to be the person's party, not the government. Now, I don't know parliamentary systems, but most likely even in a parliamentary system, a party can't dismiss an *elected* official just because he/she is one of them -- the official was elected by the voters at large, not by party members only. Nonsensical, loose talk like yours is *exactly* why Misplaced Pages should keep itself an oasis of sophisticated evidence checking. PS. The media report should have said "Opponents claims to out ... " You can't "out" somebody for being something who is not that something. Hurmata (talk) 00:43, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Glad you are amused. I find homophobia to be rather deadly too often so apologize if my explanations to your response didn't seem to be un-"foolish" enough. You can now also stop correcting me on what "outing" is, I know what it is. I was using it in the same way the media report was so let's move on from here and agree that we need reliable sourcing whatever we report on Crist. Banjeboi 02:11, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Benjobi: Please excuse my semi-harsh tone, but you seem way busy too busy advancing your agenda about closeted gay politicians. Chris Christ is not about closet politicians and this talk page for sure doesn't need the LGBT Wikiproject plastered on the top of the page. At the most, there should be a brief mention in the article about being dogged by gay rumours, and that is the end of the story. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:39, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Brewcrewer, I was the one who suggested "being dogged by gay rumours" and agreed that for now that was probably all that needed being done here. As for "plastering" the LGBT Wikiproject tag it's no more plastered than any other wikiproject tag and simply means the person is of interest to the LBGT project; obviously this BLP is of interest. As for my "agenda"? It was to respond to what I found to be a bit offensive but I simply tried to respond. That I can't remember the name of the closeted politician in my example doesn't mitigate that these scenarios do happen and that closeted politicians certainly have existed before. If you wish to invent some agenda behind that I guess I can't stop you. My agenda remains to improve articles and I intend to stay focussed on that. Banjeboi 03:22, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Comment. I am an RfC responder: I agree that the sexual orientation issue is relevant to the bio, and should be incorporated. Anyone who pays attention to politics has heard them. They are widely published, and they will certainly affect Crist's chances of getting the VP slot.Verklempt (talk) 21:48, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Rolling back edits

I have rolled back a whole series of edits because of the carnage done to the citations. Removing the URL, title of the article, author, and access date is not wikifying, it's rendering useless. Please use the {{cite web}} or {{cite news}} templates if you wish to rework the citations and standardize them. ({{cite book}} can be used for references out of a book.) Standardizing references is a good thing, but stripping them of content is very bad. Horologium (talk) 21:38, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

I have added in a {{cite news}} template for reference #3, the Adam Nagourney article from The New York Times. Feel free to use it as an example for fixing the other references. Horologium (talk) 21:46, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

I have apologized to the editor in question, because he was quite correct and I was wrong. I misread the format he used for notes and citations, and jumped to conclusions. Horologium (talk) 03:19, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Another sources RE: gay rumours?

http://www.browardpalmbeach.com/2008-02-28/news/the-talk-of-the-green-iguana/ Cheers, Conor (talk) 09:21, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

This is the source which was previously listed in the article, and it is problematic. See the discussion (above) regarding this source and its provenance, and (even further up) in this discussion, in which I address some of the issues with the sources used by Bob Norman. An ideological axe-grinder like Norman should not be used as a source for a contentious issue such as asserting a sexual orientation of another person that conflicts with that person's own stated orientation, without evidence to the contrary. Innuendo and insinuations are not justification to make such statements, and Crist has made it clear that he is offended by them. Horologium (talk) 09:50, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Ulferts, Alisa (Sept. 7, 2002). "Passing the Bar a Bear for Some." St. Petersburg Times, pp. 1B.
"Senate 1372: Relating to Agriculture & Consumer Services". Retrieved June 26, 2007.Text and history of the bill at flsenate.gov: "05/24/07 Approved by Governor;"
"House OKs plan to prohibit banning fireworks". Retrieved June 26 2007. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)www.sun-herald.com / Associated Press: "The House passed a wide-ranging agriculture bill that includes a prohibition on new local laws banning fireworks, despite the objections of some lawmakers who said it infringes on the authority of local governments."
{{cite web | url = http://www.ffca.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=4 | title = Florida Fire Chiefs' Association position statement | format = | accessdate = June 26, 2007 }Letter to Gov. Crist: "On behalf of the 2,300 members of the Florida Fire Chiefs’ Association, I respectfully ask that you veto SB 1372. ... The Florida Fire Chiefs are not opposing the bill, or the concept of a task force to study issues surrounding sale and use of fireworks. The most recent amendment adopted by the House Environmental and Natural Resources Council and the Senate General Government Appropriations committee is what the association opposes. ... We are entering into a high wildfire danger season, it is concerning that the legislature has decided by adopting this amendment to strip all local governments of their authority to enact any ordinances, rules, or regulations to protect their citizens for the next year or until the task force comes back with a report to the legislature and the legislature takes action on the report."
Charlotte lifting fireworks ban. Port Charlotte, Florida: Charlotte Herald-Tribune. June 23, 2007. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)CS1 maint: year (link)Section B "Charlotte" pages 1B, 8B: CHARLOTTE COUNTY - Trumped by a state law, Charlotte County is preparing to lift a ban on the sale of fireworks despite persistent drought conditions. "We lost the power to do this," said Charlotte County Fire Chief Dennis Dido. "We were overruled by the state." Charlotte officials enacted the temporary ban last month as wildfires raged across the state. ... Drought conditions have not improved in Southwest Florida despite recent rains, but an attachment on an agriculture bill signed by Gov. Charlie Crist prevents communities from banning the sale of fireworks until the work of a statewide talk force on fireworks is completed in 2008. ... "The fireworks lobby is more powerful than local governments," Dido said.

Categories: