Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Willy turner (talk | contribs) at 16:25, 24 July 2008. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

	This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Misplaced Pages. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

There are way too many stadiums in the USA listed here, where there are much larger stadium from other countries that are ignored -- 86.13.155.120 08:52, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Part of this is due to the fact that the US simply has a lot of large stadiums. If there are some large stadiums from other countries that you feel should listed, feel free to add them!Patken4 21:03, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Links in headings??

Same query as for indoor arenas: links are contrary to Manual of Style Robin Patterson 00:49, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)

And, the same response ... I think there's a fairly sound basis for an exception as far as lists that are divided by geographic boundaries (and particularly those that, like this one, seem to go on forever). --DMG413 00:24, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Splitting list?

New intro predicts a split of this page:

List of stadiums in Africa List of stadiums in Asia etc.

Why so? Do we have to maintain two lists? Please do not. I will add links #internal to this page, hope that will do.

-DePiep 15:23, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

We might need to re-visit this issue. The article currently is at 105K. While the guide is that articles should be 32K, the list is getting very long. Anyone agree? Patken4 02:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Edits by user:Alanmak

Re " Justisfy why a subnational entity could be separated out from the country that it belongs to and make a new entry. This wastes space, create confusion and is silly. " - I've yet to see any valid argument that applies only to Hong Kong and Macao, but not Åland Islands, Greenland and the Faroe Islands, for instance. User:Alanmak has been arguing Hong Kong and Macao are part of the People's Republic of China. This is a fact that no body can deny, as stated in each of the basic laws " inalienable part of the People's Republic of China ". The key issue is that whether these territories should be separately listed, as they do in real-life practices and conventions. — Instantnood 06:07, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

• All unassessed articles
• Unassessed List articles
• Unknown-importance List articles
• WikiProject Lists articles