Misplaced Pages

User talk:Janeyryan

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cla68 (talk | contribs) at 07:24, 4 November 2008 (Last time I'll say this: please don't personalize disagreements). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 07:24, 4 November 2008 by Cla68 (talk | contribs) (Last time I'll say this: please don't personalize disagreements)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Last time I'll say this

I'm sorry, I only mean "trolling" in the sense that you're trying to provoke a reaction. That's what it seemed like at the time:

We are in agreement that this sort of dialog does not belong on the talk page. At the time, this dialog did seem like trolling. I'm sorry, but I will say for the last time that I sincerely think this proposal is a good idea, and I would continue to believe it if a pack of editors with the reverse of your POV showed up. It's a good idea because it permanently removes the incentives to violate the ArbCom probation.

I've agreed with many of your edits in the past, so I would appreciate if you not continually cast aspersions on my motives.

As for my COI, a look at the Mantanmoreland case should tell you what it is. That is the entirety of my conflict of interest. It's inappropriate to write about a real person after being instrumental in events that presumably got them banned from the forum. Cool Hand Luke 06:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

But you are trying to topic ban editors that have been a burr under your saddle. We have had major issues in the past, with you accusing me, in effect, of being a banned editor, and I see now that you have crossed swords with JohhnyB256 too in the past. Under the circumstances, assumption of good faith is difficult if not impossible.
Again, I ask you to take your beef with me and JohnnyB to the appropriate forum,as it is disruptive in Talk:Naked Short Selling.--Janeyryan (talk) 07:14, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
I don't have a beef with you. I think this is a good proposal for reasons unrelated to your POV. I don't know how many times I can say this: I don't have a dog in the ring here. I'm no POV warrior. Here I reverted to JohnnyB's version because I thought it was better than Macken79's. Here I removed some pro-lawsuit SYN that doesn't belong in the article. I would appreciate it if you can assume good faith. Cool Hand Luke 07:22, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Janeyryan, please don't personalize disagreements. Cla68 (talk) 07:24, 4 November 2008 (UTC)