Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nepaheshgar (talk | contribs) at 05:15, 6 November 2008. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives

1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

How-to make and delete a page

• Try to remember how you created User:Tundrabuggy/ Yom Tov Samia! I go to my user page, add /summick to the URL in the browser's address box and hit Enter! Why delete? You might want to go back. I have this permanent sandbox which I simply blank after each session. But if you must delete, just tag it {{db-author}}. — RHaworth (Talk

Content Dispute

You might be interested in here: --Nepaheshgar (talk) 00:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Nahum Goldmann

please look at the correct pages next time....Tundrabuggy you unfortunately incorrectly noted the page numbers as 22-23 whereas the number I gave (look in history of article) was 22 and 31-33,....The statement was neither inaccurate nor misleading....Ashley kennedy3 (talk) 07:35, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

The quote did not say 22-23,....it gave 22 and 31-33.. check the history of the quote to confirm....as you misread you failed to look in the right place....please next time double check....Ashley kennedy3 (talk) 15:01, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

My quote was pgs22-23 because those were the pages that would either confirm, or not confirm, your edit. Your pages 31-33 did not confirm your edit. Your edit was apparently your interpretation of those pages. The earlier pages demonstrate that the edit is wrong, as their was indeed a campaign by noted Zionists in relation to the quota system...further, as I have said in the talk page, your edit implies that there were no European Jews allowed into US and that is simply incorrect. Please let's keep this on the talk page and refrain from a revert war. Tundrabuggy (talk) 15:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Hezbollah

I've left a note on the talk page which mentions one of your edits. I don't see how the article is benefiting from a lot of what's going on there at the moment. --Nickhh (talk) 09:23, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Need help

Hi after seeing WW1 erupt over the Battle of Opis, I DO NOT want to see that over a disputed translation, of a battle in February 539 BC. That user ChrisO denies dispite my commentary and evidence to the subject, he lacks common sense and ignores all the evidence, its like a child asks you to give candy to him, and when you give candy to the child, the child rejects it. This is how ChrisO is. As you already know for some reason they do not become neutral, and he has recruited Aknillies, I now I spelled it wrong but it is the user who is uncivil, and loves Kurht, the translater that through her writing downplays Cyrus' acheivments. So please go on the talk page of Opis first read all my signed messages then read ChrisO's compare the two writings and see if ChrisO is correct or I am correct. I am tired of ChrisO waisting my time over this issue, ever since the first Opis dispute I barely got time to edit articles, if you could do this task I greatly appreciate it.--Ariobarza (talk) 11:34, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk

Tundrab they want to erase the memory of the Battle of the Tigris from the histories, please help me out, Xerxes hordes are closing in on my position!--Ariobarza (talk) 04:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk

Wikistalking

I am displeased to see that you have continued your wikistalking of myself following Ariobarza's canvassing above. Your behaviour is unacceptable; I have raised the issue on the administrators' noticeboard at WP:AN/I#Tundrabuggy. Please feel free to contribute to the discussion. -- ChrisO (talk) 20:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Don't be intimidated

Hi you might be interested in the defamation against you here: . Note if someone does a google search, that can easily comeup. I have filed a minor complaint to another admin here:.

There are good sources here that shows the Cylinder and positive character of Cyrus had nothing to do with the Shah: (note many of the sources are before the late Shah). For example Plato praises Cyrus (another item that was deleted from the battle of Opis archive). Plato(A Greek who at the time were rivals of Persians):Under Cyrus the Persians liberated themselves and became master of others, but allowed some freedom to subjects, even allowed them to be equals; so soldiers were loyal and wise counselors could be found and there was a spirit of freedom, friendship and community(Laws). Plato was not a victim of the Shah's propoganda. But on an important note which is for outside of Misplaced Pages. One thing I do want to warn about that the recent propping up of Nabonidus by euro-centric scholars (I do not know what other term to use since Nabonidus enslaved Jews) and belittlement of Cyrus (going against all classical sources and just one contested translation of battle of opis..and recall even in WWII the allies had to bomb euro-centrists like Hitler or else people enslaved by hitler would not be free) is a dangerous issue. The reason is that 1000 years from now, there could be revisionist type scholars doing the same about events in World War II. Oh so: "Nabonidus enslaved Jews..big deal, he was still a good guy". So this is an issue that is more important outside of Misplaced Pages and I hope you can make more people more aware on what the revisionists are trying to accomplish. --Nepaheshgar (talk) 14:36, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Ancient Persian problems

You recently contributed to an AfD discussion on an article about ancient Persian history. I have been reviewing the contributions of the editors who have been involved in these and other related articles, and have found a considerable number of issues - bad writing, original research, lack of sourcing or citations, and POV problems. I have posted the results of my review at User:ChrisO/Ancient Persian problems (it's a work in progress, as I'm still going through the contributions). Please feel free to add to it and leave any comments at User talk:ChrisO/Ancient Persian problems. I would be interested in any feedback that you might have. Thanks in advance. -- ChrisO (talk) 00:07, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

That could work

Hi that is interesting template. I created that template based on other templates such as the template for Turkish literature, Azeri Turkish literature, Persian literature and etc. Note I did not create any of those templates, but seeing those templates, I created one for Kurdish literature.

By the way take a look at the Iranian Nationalists I have listed here: (I will add more and feel free to add more) who were influenced by the last Shah's propoganda and now must be condemned to Iranian nationalism by the "enlightened" unbiased euro-centeric hysterians(I mean historian) who are promoting Nabonidus. --Nepaheshgar (talk) 05:15, 6 November 2008 (UTC)