This is an old revision of this page, as edited by InkSplotch (talk | contribs) at 02:44, 5 January 2009 (An RFC isn't a policy change, and one man's crusade "stalling" isn't part of this policy.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:44, 5 January 2009 by InkSplotch (talk | contribs) (An RFC isn't a policy change, and one man's crusade "stalling" isn't part of this policy.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)There was at one point a proposal here; it is now at /Old proposal.
Arbitration policy is the jurisdiction of Jimbo Wales and the Arbitration Committee; see e.g. the arbitration policy ratification vote, which states that the "Arbitration Policy may be tweaked as the Committee gains experience and learns better ways of doing things". Jimbo Wales has also suggested that Arbitration Policy is not open to amendment by the community.
Several attempts have been made to instigate community interest in amendment of Arbitration policy; see e.g.
- Misplaced Pages:Arbitration policy/Proposed amendment and its failed ratification vote
- Misplaced Pages:Arbitration policy/Proposed amendment revote which, despite its name, was not entirely the same as the original proposed amendment
A restriction of one hundred community votes was implemented in both votes, but not met by either.