This is an old revision of this page, as edited by NrDg (talk | contribs) at 05:58, 17 January 2009 (Protected User talk:Eugene Krabs: Page-move vandalism ( (indefinite))). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:58, 17 January 2009 by NrDg (talk | contribs) (Protected User talk:Eugene Krabs: Page-move vandalism ( (indefinite)))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)User talk:203.45.49.142
Policy does not prohibit users, including both registered and anonymous users, from removing comments from their own talk pages. Unless they're removing declined unblock requests, confirmed sockpuppetry notices, or shared IP header templates...there is no reason for you to restore what they've removed. --Onorem♠Dil 00:32, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- One of the administrators wants it there. - Eugene Krabs (talk) 00:35, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- And? They have no reason to revert the anon either. --Onorem♠Dil 00:36, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Okay... I guess I understand now. - Eugene Krabs (talk) 00:37, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Also note, JBsupreme is not an admin...not that it matters. --Onorem♠Dil 00:38, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- I see. His profile sure makes it look like he is one. XD - Eugene Krabs (talk) 00:39, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Also note, JBsupreme is not an admin...not that it matters. --Onorem♠Dil 00:38, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Full names
Please stop moving articles to the full names of the individuals involved. Articles are placed under the most commonly used name, not the full name.—Kww(talk) 05:26, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- That does make sense. Thanks for the comment. - Eugene Krabs (talk) 05:27, 17 January 2009 (UTC)