Misplaced Pages

talk:Conspiracy theory - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zen-master (talk | contribs) at 22:27, 27 October 2005 (Proposal 2.0 debate). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 22:27, 27 October 2005 by Zen-master (talk | contribs) (Proposal 2.0 debate)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
For a past main page discussion of the issue see /Main Archive1
For a vote on the issue, see Misplaced Pages talk:Conspiracy theory/archive2
For all other discussions on the original proposal see Misplaced Pages talk:Conspiracy theory/archive3

Proposal 2.0 debate

In my interpretation "conspiracy theory" is an unscientific method of presentation when utilized in an article's title, what do other people think? (hopefully people not from the POV gang and/or people that will not resort to disinformation tactics). zen master T 22:27, 27 October 2005 (UTC)