Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ohconfucius (talk | contribs) at 12:24, 14 February 2009 (→Extra! Extra! Read all bout it!). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Werdnabot

This editor is not an administrator and does not wish to be one.

24 December 2024
News and notes: Responsibilities and liabilities as a "Very Large Online Platform" Op-ed: Beeblebrox on Wikipediocracy, the Committee, and everything Opinion: Graham87 on being the first-ever administrator recall subject In the media: Delhi High Court considers Caravan and Ken for evaluating the ANI vs. WMF case From the archives: Where to draw the line in reporting? Recent research: "Misplaced Pages editors are quite prosocial", but those motivated by "social image" may put quantity over quality Humour: Backlash over Santa Claus' Misplaced Pages article intensifies Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols Traffic report: Was a long and dark December
Single page Front page About Subscribe Suggestions Archives

Real-life workload: 9.5

• 1 = no work pressure
• 5 = middling
• > 5 = please don't expect much
• 10 = frenzied

Please note that I don't normally (1) copy-edit articles, or (2) review articles that are not candidates for promotion to featured status.

Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/SS Kroonland

Hi Tony,

Hope things are all right in real life, and that you are not affected by the horrible wildfires. Just pinging you about Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/SS Kroonland, where you commented on the prose. Maralia has completed a copyedit of the article; please revisit when you get a chance.

Thanks, BuddingJournalist 18:50, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed at ArbCom

(Perma-link)

Proposal to end this all

Greg L (talk) 04:31, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

By the way, I enabled my email. I am generally paranoid about giving out any kind of personal information over the Internet. I solved this problem by creating a dedicated wikipedia email. Dabomb87 (talk) 13:40, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Overlinking

Hi Tony. Thanks for your feedback. Please feel free to delink. I'm just trying to work very quickly through the wikification backlog so am likely to make some errors. Itsmejudith (talk) 10:03, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

9.5

Wow, sorry to hear about that. Looking forward to your return after you get out from under it all. Finell (Talk) 03:40, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. It's hard—millions of dollars at stake, and much pressure from a lot of people. Tony (talk) 06:56, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

A counter-proposal

It may interesting to see what the other side has to say about date linking. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:28, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

I can't see how that won't end up like a dog's breakfast (the invitation to add suggestions). Tony (talk) 12:04, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

or a camel (a horse built by a committee), just like their RfC. It'll collect hundreds of kB of examples/wishlists of exceptions, just like the RfC was beginning to do before it closed. Ohconfucius (talk) 12:17, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Extra! Extra! Read all bout it!

Even Rubin and Cole say Tennis expert has lost it. Ohconfucius (talk) 12:24, 14 February 2009 (UTC)