This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Leadpipevigilante (talk | contribs) at 00:19, 2 November 2005. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:19, 2 November 2005 by Leadpipevigilante (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Note: If you're here to try to persuade me to change a vote on something, please reconsider if a) you've already tried before and were unhappy at my response or b) you have nothing new for me to consider.
This will stop us both from wasting each other's time. Thanks. --Jacquelyn Marie 01:57, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Broadcasting notability
I've come up with a proposal for the criteria for including TV and radio stations. Let me know what you think. Thanks -- Kjkolb 13:25, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- I made exceptions in the proposal for college radio stations (at the bottom). I knew those would be popular, so under the criteria the Wooster stations would be kept. Also, radio stations notable for some reason regardless of what class they are in can also be exceptions (also at the bottom). A notorious pirate radio station would be okay with me, but I didn't include anything about them yet. We can make the exceptions more explicit if necessary. I have already changed them a little. I went by class because, except for college stations (almost always class D), it is a pretty good indication of notability. The lower classes of radio stations are typically low power stations with no original content, local traffic information with no music, or only enough power to cover a small neighborhood. Some are only 10 to 100 watts, compared to several hundred or thousands for major stations. You can get some indication of all this if you search for stations in your state at the FCC site (external links section). There's separate searches for AM, FM and TV. I'm going offline in a minute and I'll get back to about any more comments or questions in a day or two. Thanks for your help. -- Kjkolb 14:40, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
post-archive AfD comments
Hi! Just thought I'd leave a note to let you know that I removed your comment from Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jessamyn West (librarian) because it had already been closed and archived by the time you posted. I didn't want you to be surprised about it having disappeared. (In any case, the result was "keep"!) — File:Ontario trillium sig.pngmendel ☎ 01:54, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- heh. Must've closed while I was writing my screed. That's okay. I'm just glad the article is still around. :) --Jacquelyn Marie 05:52, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
Good Job
Thought I would stop by to tell you that I am impressed with some of your work in creating and editing pages. Good job! - Sensor 02:17, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
I am impressed
...by your work on the VFD.
Have this Deletionist's Barnstar.
Take care, Molotov (talk)
21:24, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
Euclid Beach Park
Hello! Thanks for the kind words, and nice job in getting the article started! - EurekaLott 04:53, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
DYK
Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Euclid Beach Park, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
--Scimitar 21:43, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
Hi!
Thanks for the hello and welcome! Glad to help out in the good fight where i can! -Seth Mahoney 22:42, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
Maryville Middle School
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Maryville Middle School appears in danger of being trumped by a conspicuous effort on the part of deletionists. Please review the nomination and vote at your convenience. I recognize you may not feel schools are inherently notable, but you have expressed your respect for precedent.--Nicodemus75 05:19, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
A Wooster senior?
And an English major at that? What's your IS on/who's your advisor? Snowspinner 22:16, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
- Peter is the most fabulous man ever to have lived. And although I e-mailed with him recently, please do tell him that Phil said hi. :) Snowspinner 04:36, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
Re:WP:SIGN
Thanks! I knew that Bachelor's Degree in Journalism would eventually be useful for something ;-) Karmafist 07:03, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
Article Improvement Drive
Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive. This week Discovery Channel was selected to be improved to featured article status. Hope you can help… |
RENTASTRAWBERRY röck 01:39, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
Gay wolf
I have speedied it. It was speediable, no need for afd. -- Francs2000 21:57, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
- Oh. Well, good. But now I have to go clean up Afd. :) Jacqui 21:59, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
- In answer to your question since September 2003 under this username, under a variety of proxy IPs before that date. In other words a long time! -- Francs2000 22:57, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
DYK
Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Jerry White (activist), which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
SNL Characters
Hello, I'm the one that's been extensively updating SNL character articles. I notice that you're doing the same, and I was wondering if you had any thoughts on the problem that's come up with all the stubs that have come from the process. Gay Hitler and Zagat's have been nominated for deletion, and I think we should create categories which can encompass all the characters. Two categories I have in mind are "Characters Appearing on Weekend Update" and "Short-Lived Recurring Characters" (appearing four or fewer times).
My main question is, do you know how to logistically make this happen? I don't know the technical aspects of it, particularly how to link characters to those pages when they're created. Only names with their own pages can be linked like this right? If it was part of a larger article, that kind of link would go nowhere, right? Leadpipevigilante 00:19, 2 November 2005 (UTC)