This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Eruvian (talk | contribs) at 02:38, 1 March 2009 (moved Talk:Secure USB drive to Talk:USB flash drive security: Consensus in recent AfD that ''Secure USB drive'' is unencyclopedic.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:38, 1 March 2009 by Eruvian (talk | contribs) (moved Talk:Secure USB drive to Talk:USB flash drive security: Consensus in recent AfD that ''Secure USB drive'' is unencyclopedic.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This article was nominated for deletion on 23 February 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
Computing Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Cleanup
I placed a similar comment on User Talk:Techdoctor as well. Secure USB flash drives seem to be an interesting topic. However, as someone else already remarked, it reads like an essay or magazine article where the author tries to provide arguments to convince the reader. Maybe these arguments are from publications. There are a number of references, but it is not clear which reference makes what argument, and which arguments are your own opinion. The easiest way to deal with it is to use something like
<ref></ref>
directly after each statement, and
{{reflist}}
at the end of the article. Moreover, the article should start with a short definition of what a secure USB drive is, rather than with an argument, and this short definition can be worked out later in the article. - Han-Kwang (t) 08:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Categories: