This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Freshacconci (talk | contribs) at 18:49, 10 March 2009 (Notification: Speedy deletion nomination of Franco Fornari. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:49, 10 March 2009 by Freshacconci (talk | contribs) (Notification: Speedy deletion nomination of Franco Fornari. (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Les Bienveillantes
You are right about the dead link to Quadrant. I was going to correct it and was in a rush. Sorry. They are organizing their archives and this issue is not online yet. I will watch for it. However, I do think that it is important to have a separate section for Reviews (with links if possible). I feel that we are often writing for different audiences: there will be some who come to the article and want to know how it has been reviewed without having to plow through the footnotes. There will be others who read the whole article. On the whole, I feel that it is useful to have a separate section of references in most articles which lists at least all of the literature that is cited in the the footnotes. --Joel Mc (talk) 11:46, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
I guess we disagree on this.
- in the present case there doesn't seem to be a danger of creating a "giant link section."
- generally I believe that it is rather routine to include notes and references sections, i.e. see recent featured articles: Greece Runestones and Harriet Tubman or for that matter my favorite model: Johannes Kepler
Speedy deletion of Franco Fornari
A tag has been placed on Franco Fornari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. freshacconci talktalk 18:49, 10 March 2009 (UTC)