This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Willisis2 (talk | contribs) at 02:58, 12 April 2009 (→Vandalism: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:58, 12 April 2009 by Willisis2 (talk | contribs) (→Vandalism: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Please feel free to leave a new message. To do so, please click here - I will respond on your talk page as necessary :)-Fastily
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 Archives |
|
Archive 1: Jan 2008 |
The edit to http://en.wikipedia.org/Gaspar_Yanga is intended to update the reference url that is no longer accessible and thus is not of much use to a would be reader. An archived version of the original url was provided as a result. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikesoft (talk • contribs) 21:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
I've re-added the archived url of the original article, the original url does show that it was permanently shutdown on Oct. 31, 2008 as seen here: —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikesoft (talk • contribs) 21:30, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Twilight the musical.jpg
I removed the F7 speedy tag, as the image appears to be a logo, was tagged as such. Disputed fair use {{dfu}} could be used if the FuR is disputed, or send it to Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Thanks Skier Dude (talk) 23:24, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
RFA thanks
| My RFA passed today at 61/5/4. Thanks for participating in my RFA. I appreciate all the comments I received and will endeavor to justify the trust the WP community has placed in me. Have a nice day. :-) AdjustShift (talk) 20:53, 11 April 2009 (UTC) |  |
Vandalism?
I noticed that you reverted this edit and called it vandalism on the user's page. I think that this information was at least added in good faith, and perhaps something that should have stayed in the article. it may have been a bit poorly worded, but I don't think the intent was malicious. KJS77 02:51, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
attempted de-orphaning
So in what way was the attempt at de-orphaning Galactic Odyssey unconstructive? I looked through the wiki pages that were candidates, I googled the book and tried to find other leads, I tried searching for pages mentioning the main character Billy Danger, and came up with nothing. So, in order to let others know that I'd worked on it and couldn't come up with any way of providing more links, I put the att tag in the orphan template, and noted that I'd tried in the edit summary. Where did I go wrong? Agathman (talk) 02:52, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Sending you a message, by clicking the link where you've said "please send me a message", is "unconstructive"?
Hello? Have you set up an automated response so that you respond to any message saying it's "unconstructive?" I'm confused. Oh, sorry, forgot to sign. Agathman (talk) 02:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism
I wouldn't call this edit vandalism. He was doing what I wanted him to do, which would make it acceptable on Misplaced Pages. The edit did not just get rid of the speedy, but fixed the article correctly. He may not have handled it properly. but he is new. Thanks! Ŵïllî§ï$2? (Talk!/Sign) 02:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC)